Kherson counterattack - What's happening? Continuous updates with latest information 1/🧵
Hersonin vastahyökkäys - mitä tapahtuu? Päivittyvä ketju, normaalista poiketen englanniksi. 1/🧵
Background: Over the last few weeks, Ukraine has been shelling the bridges over Dniepr and Inhulets. It has also destroyed many Russian military targets in the rear areas. Despite the difficult logistical situation, Russia has concentrated more troops in the Kherson direction. 2/
There have been rumors about an upcoming Ukrainian counterattack to liberate Kherson. First of all - does liberating Kherson mean liberating the city, the oblast or the area over the Dniepr? I'd say the main objective is to push the Russians to the southern side of the river. 3/
However, Russians are controlling a significant land areas. Liberating all the cities and villages will not be an easy task. Ukraine has conducted smaller counterattacks before, in which they've progressed village by village. No large or decisive offensives have been seen. 4/
Some sources say that Ukraine might not yet have the ability to liberate Kherson. The current attacks could also be hurried because of the political situation - Ukraine may want to show that it can do serious damage to the Russians on the ground too. 5/
At this point we can't yet say, what the exact objectives of this offensive are. Different sources are indicating that Ukraine is attacking at a rather wide front, and Ukrainian officials are indeed confirming that an attack is taking place. 6/
Remember that videos from random single soldiers don't tell very reliable information from the frontlines. For example massive damage on a platoon level may seem catastrophical from his perspective, but he probably does not have a comprehensive picture of the events unfolding. 7/
Explosions in Nova Kakhovka during the day. Not something totally unique, but fits the overall situation. 8/
Ukraine attacking in the Visokopillya direction. Fighting around the town isn't a new thing - that's happened before. There were even rumors about an encirclement some weeks ago, which turned out to be false. Sadly many people fell for the #RUMINT. 9/
Both sides are reporting Ukrainian advance towards the village of Sukhyi Stavok. No geolocated pictures or videos yet, though.
The attack is coming from the Inhulets bridgehead. Ukraine has fought in the area before also, but at that time the Russians pushed Ukraine back. 10/
Adviser to the Head of the Office of Zelenskyy also gives some hints. He seems positive on the outcome. The fog of war makes OSINT difficult, as the Ukrainians have proven to be pretty great at OPSEC, especially at the Southern front.
CNN reports that Ukraine has liberated four towns: Tomyna Balka (1), Pravdyne (2), Nova Dmytrivka (3) and Arkhanhel's'ke (4). Also Sukhyi Stavok (5) has been reported as liberated.
Maybe Tomyna Balka could have been confused with Zolota Balka, which is here.
Anyway, concrete proof is still missing as the fighting is going on - only Sukhyi Stavok has been confirmed by both Ukrainians and Russians. 13/
General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine does not mention any Southern progress in their evening update. Instead it says that the Russians tried to attack Potomkyne, next to Vysokopillia. Usually they're very vague about the South anyway, so this isn't that significant. 14/
Various pro-Russian channels are claiming attacks in these directions around the Mykolaiv-Kherson-highway. According to them, Ukraine got into Pravdyne and Kyselivka, but they were pushed back.
As usual, no proof has been presented (not surprising with pro-Rus channels). 15/
This morning I halted my tweets for some hours, so that any possibility of breaching OPSEC would be eliminated. Everything I'm posting are from open sources.
The day started with sounds of fighting near the city of Kherson. Not only artillery, but also small arms fire. 16/
This video has been going around as proof of Russians running away from their positions in Kherson. In reality, it's a video of Russian troops advancing in Pisky area. There's a lot of possible misinformation going around, as actual material from the counterattack is rare. 17/
After 3 days of fighting, we are seeing the first geolocated material of the results. Ukraine has reached Arkhanhel's'ke, or at least the northern parts of the town. 18/
Our OSINT-team also has reasons to believe that Ukraine may have forced the Russians out of Liubomyrivka and Ternovi Pody. This is, however, unconfirmed at this point. It seems that the Russians have experienced some setbacks, but have been able to hold most of the line. 19/
Interestingly, unconfirmed pro-Russian sources are claiming that Ukraine is widening it's bridgehead and is heading towards Bruskynske. If Bruskynske gets liberated and the road is cut, the logistical situation will get even more difficult for the Russians. 20/
Something you haven't seen before: Here's an assessment of possible Russian defense lines in the Herson area. Not fully accurate, but gives a good overview of the situation. Made by @J_JHelin and @EerikMatero from our OSINT team. 21/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Russia has five active air bases near northern Finland and Norway. In this thread, I will go through the bases and their recent changes in activity and infrastructure, and how the war in Ukraine has affected them.
There have been some surprising developments. 1/
The five air bases are located in Murmansk oblast: Severomorsk-1, -2 and -3, Monchegorsk and Olenya. There are more air bases near Finland further south in Karelia and St. Petersburg, but currently most of the largest and militarily active ones are in the north. 2/
In June 2022 Russia announced plans to repair several of the northern air bases. The work has begun. In Severomorsk-1, fighter shelters on the eastern side of the field were repaired somewhere between 2023-24. However, in Severomorsk-2, there are more surprising changes. 3/
Russia is developing its military infrastructure and conducting organizational reforms near Nato’s northern flank, especially near Finland. News agencies from different countries have asked me about the topic, and in this thread I will share some recent observations. 1/
Firstly, a brief overview of the organisational level. In 2024, Russia reestablished the Leningrad Military District (LMD) as a part of a larger reform of the military districts. The LMD covers the north-western Russia, including Baltic and arctic directions. 2/
At the same time, Russia is expanding its existing brigades into divisions and bringing entirely new troops into Finland's neighboring regions. For example, the 138th Guards Motor Rifle Brigade from Kamenka was recently transformed into the 69th Motor Rifle Division. 3/
Putin declared a temporary ceasefire. What can be expected?
Firstly, Russia only makes such an announcement if it benefits Russia's diplomatic or military goals. Russia isn't suddenly seeking a quick peace, this is most likely a measure related to ongoing negotiations. 1/
Putin says that Russian forces must be ready to repel potential ceasefire violations and provocations.
It's possible Russia will try to accuse Ukraine of breaking the ceasefire, which could then be used as evidence of Ukraine's unwillingness to reach a peace settlement. 2/
Russia may be trying to show the Trump administration that it has some desire for peace. A minimal gesture of goodwill may buy political points from the United States, although its actual impact on the war is likely to be small. 3/
In the Russian-Ukrainian border region, both parties have continued offensive operations since the Ukrainian defense in Kursk collapsed.
While Russia is pushing Ukrainians out of Kursk and its own soldiers into Ukrainian territory in Sumy, Ukraine has again attacked Belgorod. 1/
In Kursk, the Ukrainian-controlled territory had been shrinking for months. It was a slow grind that hit a breaking point in March. The Ukrainian logistical situation had become increasingly difficult, and the Russians conducted a successful operation against the salient. 2/
After a hasty retreat earlier this month, Ukraine is still hanging onto a narrow strip of Russian land in Kursk with 2-3 small villages. This is not a militarily or politically relevant area, but the Russians will likely continue to push Ukrainians back. 3/
Jos Suomi ei voi lähettää edes yhtä pataljoonaa tulitaukoa takaamaan Ukrainaan, en ihan ymmärrä, miksi me olisimme oikeutettuja odottamaan aidosti vaikeita turvallisuuspoliittisiä päätöksiä vaativaa apua keneltäkään kriisitilanteessa.
"Koska Nato" ei ole riittävä argumentti. 1/
Toisekseen, jos Suomen Puolustusvoimat ovat siinä tilassa, ettei edes yhden pataljoonan varustaminen ja lähettäminen onnistu edes silloin, kun koko Euroopan turvallisuusjärjestyksen sorvaaminen on käynnissä, en ihan ymmärrä mihin puolustusbudjettimme oikein uppoaa. 2/
Pataljoona tai kaksi Ukrainaan tulitaukoa takaamaan toisi Suomeen myös arvokasta oppia ja osaamista, josta nimenomaan on kriisitilanteessa hyötyä. Reserviläisiä löytyy kyllä, ei jää vapaaehtoisista kiinni. Tämä olisi investointi, joka tuottaisi turvallisuutta myös Suomeen. 3/
Ukraine has been fighting for three years in increasingly difficult conditions. Today, the Nordic and Baltic countries announced that they will “pledge to provide equipment and training for a scalable brigade-sized unit”. It’s a textbook example of too little, too late. 1/
As far as I understand from this statement, there will be a new Ukrainian brigade based on Nordic & Baltic training and equipment. In theory, this is positive news. This could, at its best, produce a highly capable unit, trained by some of the best militaries in Europe. 2/
But here’s the catch: this brigade is being formed at a time when Ukraine faces a chronic manpower shortage. Simply put, Ukraine doesn’t lack brigades, it lacks men. Depending on its structure, this Nordic-Baltic-trained brigade could be somewhere between 3000-5000 soldiers. 3/