I remember the day I read the #Surgisphere study. I tools like @EricTopol are always available to give the legacy media the quotes they need, but I couldn't fathom the chutzpah it took the publish such nonsense.
Thankfully, I wasn't the only one to a hundred issues in the illusion, though it should be said that EVERYONE who might be called a "qualified expert" should have recognized nonsense. @raoult_didier
I keep thinking, scientists such as these probably don't sleep well at night because they never learned how to take care of their families without pfucking everyone else's. This is the definition of pathetic.
@richardhorton1
I'd like to invite you to my podcast for a discussion on how to run a medical journal and maintain a soul. That may not sound like the most scientific topic, but I'm sure that we can explore various definitions of "soul" before we look for quantification methods.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Update on the military health database story (DMED): the 2021 database snapshot was finally published in the "June" MSMR now in late August. There is a lot to sort out, and I'm working on it along with some helpful researchers.
Those are the graphs of illness rates from the past three MSMRs. Why is the shape of the data changing?
The MSMR folks have said that some telehealth medical data had been inserted into last year's report. However, in this year's report, the 2016-2018 data is brought back down!?
We also see two very interesting things in this latest release of military medical data:
1. There is no evidence of a health crisis in 2020, which had a lower rate of illness than either 2019 or 2021.
2. Illness/Injury did jump more than 10%, which is large.
The #plandemonium has entered a new stage: Gibberish Mode.
At some point, you have to wonder whether or not authorities want you to know how much of the pandemic is total nonsense.
I'm only half kidding. But there are only two possibilities:
1. Authorities want you to know that much or most of the plandemonium is nonsense.
2. Authorities don't want for you to know, but are testing to find the limits to which they can push total absurdities at the broader population while still getting away with it. There are variations of this possibility, and we've seen many variants already.
Recently, the Society of Actuaries published a 56-page data report that will likely be bias confirming to everyone. But I did the work to break this down. For you. Because I love you.
The actuaries made a video saying, "Look, the trend line shows that the excess mortality during the worst quarter was lower where more people were vaccinated," suggesting that the vaccines were at least somewhat effective.
3. But isn't that weird given that we're talking about Q3, which includes months no generally associated with death from respiratory viruses? Did they miss some kind of signal?
I'm going to run an experiment. I'm not even going to hide it. I'm going to add the hash tags in the article to my profile, attract some bots, and see what I can do with them. This could get interesting. #MeToo