1) Also, if you don't know, I have a full curriculum for homeschoolers & other educators, grades 9-12, in US & World History (wildworldofhistory.com)
I have full teacher's guides, student workbooks, tests, a built-in AP track, and ME teaching all chapters in video!
2) In addition, I have a VIP subscription for those history buffs who aren't teachers, includes:
*Five ongoing lessons in video (15 "Reagan: the American President," 11 "The 1620 Default: why the 1619 Project is Wrong," and "Enduring Lessons on Life & Citizenship,"
*ALL of my Wild Wednesday Webcasts, each on a different historical topic going back 2 years (at least 40 video programs)
*A copy of my previous book, "All Thumbs: How Our Obsession with Cell Phones is Damaging our Children" &
*SIX of my best US history classes from the curriculum
The VIP is only $69 a year at the site. I add to the video lessons regularly.
Finally, I am starting the Wild World of Politics side of the site for polling, scuttlebutt, and son not related to the curriculum. That will be free.
3) Oh, and starting in October, we will have "Hypersonic Homeschooling" starting on the site which features a leading homeschool presenter/curriculum from other disciplines. We start with Classical Historian, who does grades 1-9; then Dr. Jay Wiles' chemistry/sciences . . .
3) contd . . . then in December we'll have Monica from the Etiquette Factory. These interviews will all be FREE.
1) Folks, there are few people on Twit who, when they write/tweet, my ears perk up. Baris is one, Barnes is another. Scott Presler @ScottPresler is a third. No American including the useless head of the GOP, McRomBush, has done more for the nation.
2) When he is concerned, I am.
@ScottPresler 3) At the same time--good or bad we must always maintain perspective--in just the last few days we have seen not only good polling out of PA, NY, WA & GA but both Baris & Cahaly have noted trends for Rs that look very good, notably the strong reaction to the student loan scheme.
@ScottPresler 4) Neither has yet captured the backlash against the Fourth Reich speech, which I think will be strong, measurable, & race-tilting.
5) For good or bad, it's Labor Day. Do you remember in 2000, literally the last weekend before the election, DemoKKKRats sprung the DUI on Bush?
1) Watched "13 Lives". Good. B to B- 2) apparently close to real events 3) Pet peeve really passing me off now: constant shooting in dark, made worse by water (same problem with "The Contactor"
A filmmaker must tell a story through PICTURES. If you can't see what is . . .
3) Cont'd. . .happening you aren't telling the story. 4) I constantly fast forwarded through dive scenes, not because they were tense, but because they weren't---cuz you couldn't SEE. 5) Way too long @ 2:10. Chop 45, don't lose anything. 6) Not enough done w the coach who ...
6) Cont'd. . .kept the kids alive for 2 weeks! 7) Amazing response by volunteers. 8) Farmers told that if they built drainage systems to keep water in the cave from rising, it would flood their crops out--said "Will it save the boys?" Told maybe, they all agreed without saying
1) More from @barnes_law on the raid: Because the subpoena was on the ENTITY, and not on Trump PERSONALLY, they deliberately tried to keep Trump from invoking various Constitutional rights.
2) The FBI said they had to keep the info secret, then disclosed it, showing that . . .
@barnes_law 2) contd . . . they all along attempted to fight this in the court of public opinion, NOT in front of a grand jury. (First time they have ever done a photo of supposedly classified docs, which could of itself be a federal crime by the FBI).
3) All due to America's "public. . .
@barnes_law 3) conbted . . . ignorance of the law".
4) "They could always go rogue with the DC system and indict anyway, but legally they have nothing.
5) This "confirms that this is a Deep State raid for Deep State documents (i.e., FISAs)"
1) According to @barnes_law the whole media story about the Raid is a lie.
2) A federal grand jury issued a subpoena to the records custodian of the organization of the Office of Donald Trump for any records "marked" classified. They did not issue a subpoena to Trump.
@barnes_law 3) They wanted to avoid Trump contesting the subpoena on personal privilege grounds, including the 1st Amendment for selective prosecution, the 5th Amendment right not to be a witness against oneself, the Presidential privilege he continues to enjoy after he is no longer POTUS
@barnes_law 4) The custodian who responded provided the documents in the custody of the entity subpoenaed & certified under oath he had done so. Feds raided & seized documents marked classified. (Cover sheets shown, which don’t prove much of anything.)
1) @barnes_law on his podcast again argued that the Raid was intended to be secret; that the FBI never thought Trump would make it public. He gave at least four major reasons Trump should not be in any trouble at all, hence, the Special Master.
@barnes_law 2) There is NOTHING that can "keep Trump off the ballot." This was ruled unconstitutional by states to do so in both the Zero and McTurd cases of challenges to their "foreign birth." He will be on the ballot, period.
@barnes_law 3) A slew of good cases this week, including further smashing away at the whole China Virus ediface. Wa DC has now delayed its vax mandate til Jan, as it was going to lose.
4) Barnes & RFK Jr. have a case going forward out of TX against CDC. Basically, they are using . . .
1) Yes, but it started long before "woke." In the 1990s I was recognized as "the" authority on antebellum banking, particularly in the South. In addition, my article in the Journal of Economic History, with Charles Calomiris, a Finance prof from Columbia
1) contd . . .on the Panic of 1857 was so important that to this date it has not been seriously revised and certainly never refuted. It is cited in almost every article/book on panics, bank runs, depressions, etc.
2) Yet from the 1990s on, I was almost never asked to review . .
2) contd. . . ANY article for the Journal of American History, Pacific Historical Review, or Western Historical Quarterly. I think I did review an article or two for Journal of Southern History.
3) Why? Well, to review articles for the Journal of American History and PHR . . .