One way to think about the role of lease timing in return-to-office plans:
Imagine two peer firms with 10-year large-footprint leases, one that expires in December 2029 and the other in December 2022. Which one would you expect to put more effort behind mandatory in-person work?
Imagine two peer firms with 10-year large-footprint leases, one that expires in December 2029 and the other in December 2022. Which one would you expect to put more effort behind mandatory in-person work?
https://twitter.com/emmabgo/status/1566505111735545857
Relevant background:
—Subleasing would be at a loss, if feasible at all
—Managers & owners reportedly favor in-person work more than employees
—In theory, remote work (still) involves more unknowns than in-office c. 2019*
*No one seems to think 2019-level face time is possible
—Subleasing would be at a loss, if feasible at all
—Managers & owners reportedly favor in-person work more than employees
—In theory, remote work (still) involves more unknowns than in-office c. 2019*
*No one seems to think 2019-level face time is possible
I recently wrote about remote work in the context of Biglaw.
https://twitter.com/greg_shill/status/1479448987950276616
I also have a new paper on remote work (and employee geography generally) in publicly traded software companies, exploiting a new SEC disclosure requirement re: human capital management. #HCM #remotework
https://twitter.com/greg_shill/status/1554174813127806979
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
