You should NEVER pitch as a pair or a team. When fundraising, you've got to pitch.

Always have only ONE person doing this.

It's (barely) OK if multiple people fundraise, especially in the very early days. But you should always let 1 person lead any given relationship.
Don’t co-pitch.

Once the company is off the blocks, one person should then lead ALL fundraising activities.

Two people (or more) pitching means more possibilities for a fuckup.

All an investor needs is a bad feeling about 1 of the co-founders and it’s over.
If you talk over each other, it's also over.

Worse: team pitching makes the whole pitch less clear and precise. The more people in a call, the less time you'll have to make an impression in those precious 15 to 30 minutes you get.
If you are online, team pitches increase the likelihood of shitty connection issues.

The worst part of co-pitching, however, is that it turns a chance for relationship building to a "team meeting": best way to reduce personal connection.
I'm not going to say that team pitching never works but... I don't think I've ever seen it add any value.

This is different from team calls AFTER an investor is already minded to invest.

There you have more time and individual supporting experts can help.
But when it comes to THE pitch: have 1 person do it. With 1 story. And ideally, initially, to 1 investor only and not his entourage.

The latter may be outside of your control. The first is not.
What's your experience with this?

#fundraising #startup #cvc #familyoffice
@UnrollHelper

We need more startups and new VCs funded: If you think this can add value to founders and emerging VCs, reshare the first thread!

You can find me at @francesco_srv

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Francesco Perticarari supports 🇺🇦

Francesco Perticarari supports 🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @francesco_srv

Sep 2
In startup building and venture capital it's key to know you're often wrong and embrace it.

Because you're bound to be wrong.

👇🧵 Image
Socrates famously said he knew he knew nothing.

That was one of his biggest lessons.
Here it's why it's also one you should treasure if you're an entrepreneur or a VC investor: When you think you know it all, you're not going to be any more right than when you have your strong convictions but keep an open mind.
Read 15 tweets
Aug 23
CVCs seem all the rage these day.

And for a good reason.

Corporations who do venture investing right get a LOT value from it. However it's also easy to do it wrong and I've seen many horror stories from founders in my tech community over the years. Image
I was reading a @crunchbase news article the other day on the topic.

I found a couple of interesting gems for companies looking to build their own CVC successfully.
@crunchbase These reflection points for corporate investors or wannabe investors can also help founders understand how CVCs normally work:
Read 16 tweets
Aug 20
Global AI funding sank by 44%+ year over year, from $33. 6 billion to $18. 8 billion according to Pitchbook data shared reported on Emerging Tech Brew (Q2 2022)
This is in contract with the overall global VC funding that declined "only" 25% - from $176 billion to $131.7 billion. The explanation they came up with based on @PitchBook experts was that:
@PitchBook "The bull market in 2021 favored some longer-term sectors, such as autonomous vehicles, that led the vertical in exit accounts, or at least mega-exit count…in 2021...But that mix is shifting in 2022 to focus more on smaller exits for more fundamental and near-term technologies”
Read 7 tweets
Aug 19
Innovative, disruptive, world-leading, exciting: it's all bullshit and it's killing your VC open rate

Stop using adjectives.

If you're adding them to your subject line, it will hide your true secret sauce on mobile screens.
If you're filling up your presentation deck with them, you're cluttering the view and creating useless distraction.

If you're using them in your email or message text, you're wanting precious attention span.
If you have real category defining titles for your company or even your VC, why don't you use these?

"Hardware health-tech company raising a seed round" > "Innovative disruptor in the medical industry looking for investors"
Read 8 tweets
Aug 17
The time of monolithic venture capital is over. The great unbundling has begun. Back in the days, there were VC firms. 👴

There were big institutional LPs who would back those firms. And there were startups who would get money from these VCs. Or not.
👩‍💻 It happened the same to Excel in the SaaS world, where specialist apps took over what people used to "force" excel to "also do".
💸 Similarly in Venture Capital there is now a HUGE opportunity for investors of all types to get involved IN an asset class that used to be hard to access and fairly opaque.
Read 11 tweets
Aug 15
Working with founders in deep tech has taught me this: deep tech has 1 striking similitude with B2C consumer products. You've got to be a great storyteller in your early days.
Most people wrongly assume that launching a deep tech startup is closer to traditional B2B tech businesses because it's mostly B2B in nature.

They fail to capture 1 important difference.

👇
Traditional B2B SaaS apps have a fairly easy unit economics measurement and also a fairly easy-to-estimate market potential.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(