1/ This piece is fine for what it is. What it and others are understating or flat out missing is the link between religious fanaticism and anti-democratic anti-election white supremacism in the school #privatization push nytimes.com/2022/09/01/opi…
2/ To give serious space to people like DeAngelis (a ~30 yo lobbyist-w/PhD) to give “thoughts” is appropriate for what the #vouchers movement is but to quote him intellectually rather than a political actor misses the role rightwing think-tanks have played in election denialism
3/ It’s esp problematic given the only real offset to #DeVos/DeAngelis is Mann himself who’s been dead since 1859 and isn’t even directly quoted at that.
4/ Mostly it’s another example of the mistake treating privatization as a serious intellectual disagreement about the need/purpose for education. Today it’s a political, anti-democracy movement linked directly to Trumpism @BisforBerkshire@Edu_Historian
5/ That the edu-Right is still screaming about #teachers unions is but one main example of this. Whatever else they are, unions are today the last line of defense not just for individual #educators but the full privatization of US schools.
6/ Writing about divergent purposes of education without focus on the edu-Right’s political anti-democratic objectives is like writing a crime novel without naming the culprit or the victim. #edpolicy#edpolitics#vouchers#azed#miched#oklaed#wved#nhed
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 1/ For those who haven’t been neck deep in #schoolchoice debates for two decades let me walk you through the evolution of this argument about outcomes—it was driven by #voucher research.
Early 1990s: #schoolchoice is a rising tide that lifts all academic boats!
2/ 1990s cont’d: #vouchers seem to look pretty cool: Cecilia Rouse’s dissertation finds positive test score effects in Milwaukee’s pilot program and so do Jay Greene and Paul Peterson (well, uh, no shock there 🙄)
3/ 2002-04: Maybe not. Peterson-led work finds + effects of a small privately #voucher program, but then Alan Krueger shows they were highly, ahem, sensitive to model/sample choice. (Who are *you* picking as your starting research QB: Peterson or Krueger?) journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…