Josh Cowen Profile picture
Sep 5 • 9 tweets • 5 min read
🧵
1/ For those who haven’t been neck deep in #schoolchoice debates for two decades let me walk you through the evolution of this argument about outcomes—it was driven by #voucher research.

Early 1990s: #schoolchoice is a rising tide that lifts all academic boats!
2/
1990s cont’d: #vouchers seem to look pretty cool: Cecilia Rouse’s dissertation finds positive test score effects in Milwaukee’s pilot program and so do Jay Greene and Paul Peterson (well, uh, no shock there 🙄)
3/
2002-04: Maybe not. Peterson-led work finds + effects of a small privately #voucher program, but then Alan Krueger shows they were highly, ahem, sensitive to model/sample choice. (Who are *you* picking as your starting research QB: Peterson or Krueger?)
journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
4/
2005-2010: the first legislatively authorized (WI and USED) evaluations of honest-to-God publicly funded #vouchers. Get ready to break out the champagne and show vouchers work once and for all!!! (Narrator: They don’t Test score effects are null in both sites).
5/
2012-2013.
Oh…crap. What the hell is happening in Louisiana? Thanks to Katrina, that state is supposed to be proving school choice works once and for all! But #vouchers there look catastrophic on test scores especially in math.
6/
2013: Quick! Find another outcome to study, and fast. How about…attainment?
7/
2013-2018. Eh, those attainment studies aren’t persuasive enough, because Ohio, DC and Indiana are looking almost as bad on test scores as Louisiana. What do we do?
8/
2018-present
Ahhhh ye olde’ parent satisfaction. Safety. Discipline. Who cares about test scores anyway? As long as parents *think* their kids are getting a good education, no need to verify that right?
9/
2018-present (caveat): we’re still super cool using test scores to close public schools and fail third graders for reading results. Just don’t use them to evaluate #vouchers (or charters, which do much better than vouchers so they make vouchers look even worse)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Josh Cowen

Josh Cowen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joshcowenMSU

Sep 5
1/
This piece is fine for what it is. What it and others are understating or flat out missing is the link between religious fanaticism and anti-democratic anti-election white supremacism in the school #privatization push
nytimes.com/2022/09/01/opi…
2/
To give serious space to people like DeAngelis (a ~30 yo lobbyist-w/PhD) to give “thoughts” is appropriate for what the #vouchers movement is but to quote him intellectually rather than a political actor misses the role rightwing think-tanks have played in election denialism
3/
It’s esp problematic given the only real offset to #DeVos/DeAngelis is Mann himself who’s been dead since 1859 and isn’t even directly quoted at that.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(