Note that #BlackLivesMatter virtue signaling helped her not. She is among a group of people with money for whom support will be emotionally withdrawn from a subset of others (the banks believe), so the banks believe they can confiscate her wealth and then move on. Can they?
Will the #RainbowFriends help her? Will it require in principle that they turn against cancel culture?
Is this the new Divide and Conquer?
Principles that respect autonomy of property never have this political drawback.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The influenze/coronavirus viral interference argument is and always was something like proganda or imaginative science fiction.
I plan to write up a full article at a later date, but I'll frame the argument...
First, there are no examples of such interference in history despite the presence of a gazillion or so viruses. That should be the first Bayesian hurdle, not knowing anything else such as a mechanism for interference.
Second, the mechanism would (99.9%) then be specific to the presence of the spike protein since that is really the only place in the virus with much machinery at all that is unique to SARS-CoV-2.
Has anyone ever explained how this novel protein relates to influenza?
2. Maybe it's the current system that is limited, and what Joe talks about is illusory and he doesn't understand, perhaps even is paid to project an image of, "It's all fine."
3. I haven't seen a good argument why growth is limited. Most arguments assume the status quo system. What's the best argument to limitations?
I remember the day I read the #Surgisphere study. I tools like @EricTopol are always available to give the legacy media the quotes they need, but I couldn't fathom the chutzpah it took the publish such nonsense.
Thankfully, I wasn't the only one to a hundred issues in the illusion, though it should be said that EVERYONE who might be called a "qualified expert" should have recognized nonsense. @raoult_didier
Update on the military health database story (DMED): the 2021 database snapshot was finally published in the "June" MSMR now in late August. There is a lot to sort out, and I'm working on it along with some helpful researchers.
Those are the graphs of illness rates from the past three MSMRs. Why is the shape of the data changing?
The MSMR folks have said that some telehealth medical data had been inserted into last year's report. However, in this year's report, the 2016-2018 data is brought back down!?
We also see two very interesting things in this latest release of military medical data:
1. There is no evidence of a health crisis in 2020, which had a lower rate of illness than either 2019 or 2021.
2. Illness/Injury did jump more than 10%, which is large.
The #plandemonium has entered a new stage: Gibberish Mode.
At some point, you have to wonder whether or not authorities want you to know how much of the pandemic is total nonsense.
I'm only half kidding. But there are only two possibilities:
1. Authorities want you to know that much or most of the plandemonium is nonsense.
2. Authorities don't want for you to know, but are testing to find the limits to which they can push total absurdities at the broader population while still getting away with it. There are variations of this possibility, and we've seen many variants already.
Recently, the Society of Actuaries published a 56-page data report that will likely be bias confirming to everyone. But I did the work to break this down. For you. Because I love you.
The actuaries made a video saying, "Look, the trend line shows that the excess mortality during the worst quarter was lower where more people were vaccinated," suggesting that the vaccines were at least somewhat effective.
3. But isn't that weird given that we're talking about Q3, which includes months no generally associated with death from respiratory viruses? Did they miss some kind of signal?