Heavy content warning for #WorldSuicidePreventionDay .
Part of my being autistic is that I get what are known as "intrusive thoughts". Fairly frequently they will involve thoughts of suicide. They pop out of nowhere and can be gone as quickly as they came. 1/
They used to scare me. I have in my life attempted it twice. The funny thing now is that they are almost "reassuring". I have had those thoughts so often that I know I won't act on them. On neither of the occasions that I did try did the thought just "pop in". 2/
It built up, it festered. I felt I couldn't talk to anyone about it so I let it get worse. I felt guilty at first for the feelings, which pushed me further and further, until I made the decision and at that point I felt calm. 3/
I'm not saying that talking through your problems always solves everything. It doesn't. If the option is taking your life though, yes, talk. Call the @samaritans. Reach out to someone. In the meantime, don't be hard on yourself for having the thoughts in the first place. 4/
It's easy to say "take each day as it comes". When you're in that position of wanting to take your life you don't want to, and don't see how you can. It can be done though. Just little steps every day. Don't push too hard. Don't "force yourself" to be happy. Take little steps. 5/
Personally, I live constantly with these thoughts. They don't mean I'm depressed, or even suicidal, they're just there. I won't lie, yes I said it can be "reassuring", it can also be terrifying. I've had to learn they don't mean I will do it though. You can make it through. 6/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daniel Sohege 🧡

Daniel Sohege 🧡 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stand_for_all

Sep 11
Thread: Rather more disturbing is that the Home Secretary is briefing such obviously concerning ideas that civil servants feel the need to leak them. Also a little disingenuous to claim that those advocating for safer routes are saying they will end all channel crossings. 1/ Image
The only people who talk about "zero small boat crossings" are the government and its supporters. In the real world people recognise that setting up simpler and safer means of access to the UK asylum system will reduce them, but they are always going to be present. 2/
Where safer routes make a huge difference is in tackling criminal gangs, both smugglers and traffickers, by removing people's reliance on them. As we are already seeing an increase in "self-facilitated" crossings you have a better chance of putting those gangs out of business. 3/
Read 8 tweets
Sep 9
"Asylum seekers and migrants with sufficient resources are using human traffickers..." One main reason traffickers can exploit people is because they don't have "sufficient" resources. This is one reason it's so important to differentiate between smugglers and traffickers. 1/
On a purely practical level, you cannot tackle trafficking unless you look at how and why people are trafficked. Exploitation does occur in smuggling, however, it ALWAYS occurs with trafficking. Smuggling and trafficking have commonalities, but are not synonymous. 2/
The cost of paying a smuggler up front may, and do, lead to debt bondage and similar for some people, which can lead to exploitation. Smuggling tends, on the whole though to be transactional. Whereas traffickers exact payment through long term exploitation. 3/
Read 5 tweets
Sep 7
There's a lot of nonesense, as predicted, here from Braverman and her allies, but it does clearly show that the direction of travel for this government is to be even worse than Patel. 1/

thetimes.co.uk/article/a522ce…
The repeated use of the "pull factors" line is pure spin. No-one is seeking asylum in the UK for the pleasure of receiving fewer "benefits" than they can in many other countries, including France. 2/ ImageImage
Yes, smugglers and traffickers lie to people, quelle surprise, nothing about penalising those which they traffic changes that. Does anyone think gangs will stop lying to people just because their victims are being treated horrendously? 3/
Read 6 tweets
Sep 6
This time round might I suggest we, as in the migrants rights sector and supporters, don't jump on every batshit crazy idea the Home Secretary announces? Focus and collaborate with other organisations even more to better utilise resources. 1/
If you are trying to help, I would also really emphasize that personal attacks about the incumbents looks etc do nothing to help counter policies, and actually make it harder to get people to listen to the serious issues. 2/
Don't undermine each other with counterproductive arguments. Make sure you back things up, i.e. none of this "oh they're giving freedom of movement to X or y nationality", when you are talking about visas. It reinforces a "good/bad migrant" narrative which is easily exploited. 3/
Read 11 tweets
Sep 4
A harrowing thread by @lizziedearden, but an important one. The Rwanda scheme isn't just "flawed". Every single part of it causes more harm. There is no evidence it will "reduce channel crossings". There is mountain demonstrating it will increase trafficking and lead to deaths 1/
The last flight failed due to significant human rights concerns. That led to some, including the likely next PM, Liz Truss and the presumptive Home Secretary, Suella Braverman, to call for the UK to remove itself from the European Convention on Human Rights. 2/
When a plan requires you to start removing very basic protections, and in this case we are talking extremely basic protections, such as the right not to be tortured, it tends to demonstrate that it isn't a good plan. 3/ ImageImage
Read 16 tweets
Aug 31
How exactly Patel intends to "tackle organised criminality, illegal migration & target the criminal gangs" by targeting the victims of gangs and handing them over to the authorities of a state they are actively seeking asylum from is never fully explained is it? 1/
Making it harder for, particularly, trafficking survivors to come forward and removing, already limited, confidence to fully disclosing details of need for asylum due to the fear of it being passed back to the very state they are seeking it from. Yeah, that's going to help. 2/
Does anyone think trafficking gangs just say "oh well never mind" if people are returned to Albanian? Of course not, they just re-exploit people, except this time the victims are at even more risk due to fears that gangs may think they have spoken out, and increased debts. 3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(