Thread by @hicksyalex

Why do so many people have faith in the vaccine approval processes when there is clear evidence of fraud in PPE & test kits & cronyism in Test & Trace?

Previous vaccines were approved based on efficacy, these boosters have been approved on tiny trials (Pfizer 610, Moderna 437) based on antibody production only.
No data for Pfizer efficacy has been made available & Moderna appears negative versus the original.

Is it far fetched to believe that @MHRAgovuk came under pressure from the government to approve these vaccines urgently to win the global race for the 1st bivalent boosters?
We have previously seen pressure made by @CMO_England on JCVI for approval of children's vaccines

No Public Assessment Reports have been published for either vaccine.
These were made available immediately for the originals.

The report referrenced for Moderna approval included this statement "SARS-CoV-2 infections, regardless of the presence of symptoms, occurred in 11 (3.2%) and 5 (1.9%) participants in the mRNA-1273.214 and mRNA-1273 groups, respectively"

If I understand this statement correctly this shows negative efficacy (versus the original), all other covid vaccines have been approved based on infection reduction (despite statements by heath authorities they were to reduce hospitalisation).

Instead of calling me an anti-vaxer (I'm not, I have taken every other vaccine as has my son), please can I encourage you to read the approval documents from @MHRAgovuk
👇

Moderna
gov.uk/government/pub…
Moderna trial data
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Pfizer
gov.uk/government/pub…
(No publicly available trial report)

And encourage you to compare & contrast with the original approvals:
Pfizer
gov.uk/government/pub…
Moderna
gov.uk/government/pub…

Also please could I ask that you cross reference these approval documents with messaging from health authorities & compare & contrast.

@threadreaderapp unroll

Use of ‘VIP lane’ to award Covid PPE contracts unlawful, high court rules theguardian.com/politics/2022/…

Civil servants called UK Covid testing scheme ‘unlegit’, court hears theguardian.com/world/2022/may…

Civil servants called UK Covid testing scheme ‘unlegit’, court hears theguardian.com/world/2022/may…

£70 million in fines for pharma firms (including Pfizer) that overcharged NHS gov.uk/government/new…

BREAKING: High Court rules Dido Harding and Mike Coupe appointments were unlawful goodlawproject.org/update/dido-ha… #goodlawproject

Pfizer drug breach ends in biggest US crime fine theguardian.com/business/2009/…

Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science bmj.com/content/371/bm…

This was 7 months ago, funny how this gets so much much attention now.
Even less so than the current concern I was trying to draw attention to.👆👆👆