Match Analysis: Graham Potter’s Chelsea debut vs. Salzburg #CHESAL
Potter set his team up in a 3-diamond-3 formation in-possession, a shape we could observe often at Brighton as well.
Especially in the 1st half, Chelsea was regularly able to progress down the right against Salzburg’s asymmetric 4-diamond-2 press. When Kjaergaard (left 8) moved out, Mount was often free, if Salzbrug didn't adjust. When the pass was played wide, Chelsea had a 2v1 overload wide.
At times, Sucic would leave Jorginho to press Mount, but this obviously allowed Chelsea to easily progress through Jorginho and break the press.
Occasionally, Ulmer moved out on Mount, but that was very risky as it opened a lot of space in behind to exploit and forced the left centre back to move over.
When the ball was on Chelsea’s right side and Kjaergaard moved up, Seiwald could shift over to mark Mount. This was probably the best variation but could still leave Havertz free to receive in between the lines. However, that pass was often difficult to execute.
There were a few more little variations how Salzburg pressed, but what can be summarized is that Chelsea regularly found a way through.
Another important aspect in Chelsea’s offensive play were runs in behind by the 8s in the gap between FB and CB. These movements either dragged their markers away, opening space for someone else or the runners could exploit the space in behind themselves.
However, always making runs in behind would be very predictable and is also not the best solution to a situation every time. Especially Kovacic knew when to make runs in behind and when to stay deeper to give Sterling space for a potential 1v1.
Additionally, Havertz could also regularly make diagonal runs in behind, which were hard to track.
Chelsea’s goal represents their attacking play in that game perfectly: Progressing down the right side, run in behind by Mount to exploit space in between FB and CB, leading to a stretched backline, Aubameyang pins the FB and Sterling eventually scores.
Salzburg improved more and more as the game went on. They looked to compress the centre out of possession, were less aggressive and handed players over more cleanly. Kjaergaard for example moved out less and instead looked to mark Mount.
The Austrians eventually scored the equalizer, which came from a pressing situation. Salzburg brilliantly bypassed the counterpressing from Chelsea through quick combinations and Okafor scored the goal after a cross towards the near post by Adamu.
Conclusion:
Even though the game ended in a draw, Potter’s Chelsea looked promising. The Blues especially dominated the first half and probably should win this game.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Perfect example by ManCity on strategically using backwards passes to attract pressure, unsettling the opponent and switches through short passes.
Switches through short passes have the advantage that the in-possession side can adapt faster to open gaps compared to switches through long balls. Additionally, switches through short passes are faster and the opponent has to react to the change of the ball's position more often
For example at a long diagonal ball, the opponent only has to shift across and usually has enough time to adapt.
“Look for the 3rd man (free man) to be able to turn and face the play.” ~ Lillo
Pure De Zerbi football in the following scene:
Initial 2-4 build-up structure.
RCM dropping deep to help RCB. This dropping movement triggers RB to move up and RM to invert (out of frame), leading to the creation of a 2-3 structure.
RCM can now access the lone 6/free man (initial LCM) through a 3rd man combination.
Liverpool won with the Community Shield their first title of the season against the great rival Manchester City.
There were especially two very similar scenes that stood out to me, which showed how Jürgen Klopp uses his players’ strengths in the final third.
To get a little bit of context in there, Liverpool played in a somewhat asymmetric 2-3-5 when attacking in the final third. Salah and Robertson kept the width, with Henderson and Diaz in the half-spaces higher up. Alexander-Arnold and Thiago stayed deeper in the half-spaces.
Major aims in possession are getting in between the lines of the opponent and in behind. However, that’s what most defensive sides try to restrict by using a compact block with little space in between the lines and or a deep block to make it difficult to get in behind.
Defensive sides are getting better and better and offensive sides continuously fail to crack compact and or deep blocks. One way to access space in between the lines or in behind is by intentionally attracting pressure.
This thread analyses the various ways to lure pressure.
Diagonality is from immense importance in nearly every phase of the game, but still often undervalued.
This thread analyses the importance of diagonality both in and out of possession.
Offensive aspects:
To begin with, let's have a look on passing. There is usually a distinction between three types of passes: horizontal passes, vertical passes, and diagonal passes.
Tottenham started the game pretty well in their basic 3-4-3 shape. ManCity wanted to press them in an aggressive 4-2-3-1. De Bruyne as the 10 marked the ball-near 6 and the ball-far winger tucked in to the ball-far 6.
But this wasn’t always executed well at the beginning. The ball-far winger didn’t tuck in enough at times. Moreover, the pressure on Tottenham’s back line wasn’t high enough. Therefore, Tottenham was able to switch the play and access the open space ball-far.