Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) Profile picture
Sep 17, 2022 6 tweets 6 min read Read on X
[1]
How interesting.
The parts of the env trimer for HlV found in the SARS-CoV-2 genome happen to match the epitopes targeted for vx studies since ~2015.
They target the CD4 binding site.
& DC-SIGN [CD209].
This is what was blocked by Fαuci in Jan 2020
@GigaohmResist @TyCardon ImageImageImage
@GigaohmResist @TyCardon [2]
Fauci knew what these meant, because his VRC had been working on such candidates since at least 2006.
He knew that Furin triggers cancer cell growth, and that HlV is enhanced by/enhances amyloid dev.
The cascade of both would look just like what @EthicalSkeptic has shown us
@GigaohmResist @TyCardon @EthicalSkeptic [3]
This is what has become clear to me after reading 400 studies just looking at the homologous elements between HlV/SARS-CoV-2.
It's the end result of the findings laid out in⬇️
It's what they must hide until after the election
researchgate.net/publication/35…
@GigaohmResist @TyCardon @EthicalSkeptic [4]
All of which was sparked by the pre-print from a group of researchers in India.
They are heroes, who sought to warn the world of what was coming [@asrayagiriraj].
Foul-chi is now blocking research on l0ng C0vid - because he knows it's his fault, after hiding the homology
@GigaohmResist @TyCardon [1.5]
The fusion peptide [FP] of both viruses was already almost identical, which is key for understanding the promise of fusion inhib.
The 1st pic above describes the need for CD4bs + at least 2 other epitopes. 1 is the FP, & another is the V2 loop.
Homologous 'enough'
but wait-
@GigaohmResist @TyCardon [1.6]
The 2 regions identified by Montagnier & @JCPEREZCODEX stretch across the 1st part of the Spike protein, increasing this homology.
Perhaps even allowing for tests with certain primers to detect the presence of certain things

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c)

Charles Rixey, MA MBA (c) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CharlesRixey

Feb 15, 2025
Look at THAT title change on a paper about SARS-CoV-2's "unusual persistence" in "aerosol suspensions" compared to SARS and MERS, from 2020⬇️.

They sought to minimize a key finding - Why?

A🧵...



@chrismartenson @EthicalSkepticpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC74…Image
2/
'Increasing pathogen stability in an environment'

is one of the 7 categories of Gain-of-Function experiments, as stated in US gov policy⬇️

One of the co-authors of the paper linked above is Robert Garry, of the "Proximal Origin" crew.

They describe a 5-fold⬆️ in stability of the SARS-CoV-2 virus particles in air compared with SARS-1
[16 hrs vs 3 hrs]Image
Image
3/
In short, the COVID virus has features that look like the result of GOF work - as pointed out by one of the scientists also arguing that the virus WASN'T manipulated.

Why would Garry know this? He's got a primate lab that can study this at Tulane U. Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 29, 2025
Linked below is an article written by LtCol Joseph Murphy, the person who leaked the DEFUSE proposal to me, which DRASTIC then analyzed and released on September 20th & 21st, 2021.
🧵
brownstone.org/articles/the-b…
2/
The DEFUSE proposal was rejected by DARPA for two main reasons, only the first of which is widely known:

1- it contained obvious gain of function [GOF]

2-the claimed end product was a bat vaccine, a spike/nanoparticle combo that couldn't work, because of "partial epitope coverage."
3/
The latter means, in short, that any vaccine based only on the spike protein ONLY was doomed to fail, as a virus could simply evolve around it.

This was KNOWN IN 2018.

And yet Fauci doubled down on the technology after the Pentagon's best scientists had rejected it.
With devastating consequences
Read 4 tweets
Jun 26, 2023
[1]
To all those who've thanked me,
and supported me,
I want each of you to know that
the honor is ALL
mine.

I wish you could see what I see,
that you are all worth it.
The loved ones you lost,
deserve it.
And we will not stop until you are given the truth.
I swear it...
[2]
Why?
Because they lied to us.

Drs & Nurses wore trash bags and used masks at the start of a pandemic that never should've happened.

Spouses couldn't hold the hands of their loved ones as they died, because scientists chose to protect themselves, not you.
[3]
If not for the courage of Major Murphy, you would not have the proof that my own government lied about the research in China,
& their connections to it.

To the rest of the🌍,
my heart is broken
that so little courage remains
amongst our leaders.
They will never apologize.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 24, 2023
Speaking from a position of some authority on the issue,

The origin of the pandemic has never been terribly complicated.
But it was, and remains,
terrible. Image
@AGHuff [2]
Now, let's compare my Watchmaker conclusions, as of May 1, 2023, with the DNI report on COVID's origins that just released:

@KanekoaTheGreat @Jikkyleaks @ichudov @BretWeinstein @chrismartenson @Kevin_McKernan @drdrew @TexasLindsay_ @KimDotcom

dni.gov/files/ODNI/doc…
@AGHuff @KanekoaTheGreat @Jikkyleaks @ichudov @BretWeinstein @chrismartenson @Kevin_McKernan @drdrew @TexasLindsay_ @KimDotcom [3]
I can save you some time and just summarize my own conclusion:

The DNI report might as well have been written by Xi Xinping himself.

It ignores the 3 scientists' names, the DEFUSE proposal and misrepresents the extant evidence.

I suggest saving time & just reading this: Image
Read 4 tweets
May 18, 2023
[1]
I'd summarize this by saying that it provides even more options for the process that led to the Pradhan et al insertions, expanding beyond just HlV homologies.

BTW, none of the options are "zoonotic."

Further, THE vital repository of glycosylated epitopes in any case… https://t.co/c75Q2ozOrw https://t.co/C0AvbL8JpKtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…

Image
@alykhansatchu @MonaRahalkar @humblesci [2]
Consider, for instance, what Spyros Lytras DIDN'T say here [pic#1]
He forgot to mention that the unprecedentedly long n-loops are exactly Pradhan inserts#1-3 from... HlV v-loops
That's a big miss.
The new article, , adds other possible sources for the… https://t.co/25ZbE2bg61 https://t.co/bo7fuaL2wacovorigin.org/2023/05/15/mys…
twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Image
@alykhansatchu @MonaRahalkar @humblesci @MartinaSisters @VBruttel @tony_vandongen @Parsifaler @Biorealism @lifebiomedguru @quay_dr [3]
A bizarre yet related omission comes from the 30-year creator/admin of the database, Bette Korber - the #1 h-index researcher at LANL overall.

In her landmark article that highlighted the D614G mutation, ,
Korber suggests the mutation affects ACE2… https://t.co/fB2OFq6xP6 https://t.co/H5UVEBS6w0biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Image
Read 4 tweets
May 10, 2023
[1]
3 years have been wasted arguing about raccoon dogs at the Huanan Market.
Aggregated case data from 38 Chinese studies shows ~5,809 more cases than officially reported from the WIV & BSL-4 districts
-& the mkt districts had 4,901 LESS than reported
@chrismartensontwitter.com/i/web/status/1… Image
@chrismartenson @emilyakopp @Engineer2The @quay_dr @AGHuff @WashburneAlex @VBruttel @alykhansatchu @Bryce_Nickels @franciscodeasis @DrJBhattacharya [2]
The data also shows that the entire net gain on the WIV side of the Yangtze River - & the net loss on the mkt side - can be explained by those same districts.

&, ALL 38 data sources come from studies by🇨🇳drs & scientists
-82% from Wuhan itself
& ALL ignored by the CCP's WHO… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… ImageImage
@chrismartenson @emilyakopp @Engineer2The @quay_dr @AGHuff @WashburneAlex @VBruttel @alykhansatchu @Bryce_Nickels @franciscodeasis @DrJBhattacharya [3]
Somehow, neither the CCP nor the "Proximal Origin" authors who pushed the market-origin hyp for 3 years managed to include >1 of those 38 studies in their own publ.
This is disappointing, especially after I urged @MichaelWorobey - publicly & privately - to look at the data. ImageImageImage
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(