1 The Iranian regime’s brutal killing of 22-year-old Mahsa Amini—whose head was reportedly bludgeoned repeatedly against a wall after she was detained for showing too much hair—should permanently alter how foreign officials and reporters interact with Iranian officials #مهساامینی
2 In her recent 60 Minutes interview w/ President Raisi (here questioning the Holocaust), Leslie Stahl said “I was told how to dress, not to sit before he did, and not to interrupt him.” These terms are no longer acceptable; they legitimate discrimination
3 Compulsory hejab is one of the three ideological pillars of Iran's theocracy, along with 'Death to America' and 'Death to Israel'. Mahsa's case was not isolated. Numerous Iranian women are serving double-digit prison sentences for refusing to veil. amnesty.org.uk/actions/iran-w…
4 Compulsory hejab is but one example of Iran's structural gender discrimination. As we witnessed last summer with the return of the Taliban, the first thing Islamists do after taking power is subjugate women in the name of religion/culture:
5 Forced hejab also reflects a warped ideology that men are uncontrollable savages in the presence of unveiled women. To quote @khamenei_ir: “If we want to prevent our society from being plunged into corruption and turmoil, we should keep women in hijab.” english.khamenei.ir/news/1233/The-…
6 Khamenei's answer to #metoo was also compulsory hejab: "By introducing the hijab, Islam has shut the door on a path that would pull women towards such deviation.” This is the same ideology that blames female sexual assault victims for dressing immodestly
7 In his book "On Tyranny", historian Timothy Snyder notes the importance of resisting symbols of intolerance. "You might one day be offered an opportunity to display symbols of loyalty. Make sure that such symbols include your fellow citizens rather than exclude them."
8 Compulsory hejab is not culture, it is the most prominent symbol of the Islamic Republic of Iran's system of gender apartheid, and it is enforced with brutality.
9 Iranian women have been resisting this ideology for decades. Among the slogans of Iran's current protest movement is "Woman, Life, Freedom" (Zan, Zendegi, Azadi), the antithesis of a regime that subjugates women, celebrates martyrdom, and crushes freedom
10 Foreign officials and reporters--including at the UN this week--should cease legitimizing the violent, intolerant ideology of Iran's regime in the name of "respecting culture". Any culture that upholds the systemic abuse of its women deserves to die.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1🧵 My new @ForeignAffairs essay on the ideological clash in the Middle East whose outcome could prove most consequential for the region and the world order, the battle between Saudi Arabia's "Vision 2030" and the Islamic Republic of Iran's "Vision 1979". foreignaffairs.com/middle-east/ne…
2 Vision 2030 appeals to popular aspirations; Vision 1979 exploits popular grievances. Vision 2030 seeks partnership with the U.S. and Israel; Vision 1979 thrives on resisting both. Vision 2030 is driven by social liberalization; Vision 1979 is anchored in social repression.
3 The two visions reflect the distinct personalities of their leaders: 85-year-old Ayatollah Khamenei and 39-year-old Crown Prince MBS, two of the region’s most powerful figures, whose mutual animosity is clear. MBS champions modernity, while Khamenei lionizes martyrdom.
1🧵Brief intro to our new essay with @nicolegrajewski on the Russia-Iran partnership and its centrality to numerous global challenges, including nuclear proliferation, cybersecurity, authoritarianism, disinformation, illicit finance, and energy security. carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/…
2 Russia and Iran are historical geopolitical rivals with competing national interests and centuries of mutual mistrust. Yet, throughout history, they've occasionally united against common adversaries, including the Ottoman Empire, the British Empire, and now the United States.
3 Perceived U.S. efforts to encircle them militarily, and subvert them internally, are one basis for their partnership. Their cooperation in deadly wars in Syria and Ukraine have further deepened their military, economic, and diplomatic ties. nytimes.com/2022/10/17/wor…
1🧵 Iran and Israel are unnatural enemies. They have complimentary national interests (energy/technology), a historic cultural affinity (Persians/Jews), and no bilateral land or resource disputes. Their conflict is best understood through the prism of ideology, not geopolitics.
2 The origins of the Iran-Israel conflict can be traced to Ayatollah Khomeini, the leader of the 1979 revolution that transformed Iran from a US-allied monarchy into an Islamist theocracy. Khomeini's myriad writings reflect his contempt for Israel and his open antisemitism.
3 Ayatollah Khamenei, Khomeini's successor, shares this worldview. He's frequently said Iran “will support and assist any nation or any group anywhere who opposes and fights the Zionist regime." He was the lone world leader to praise Hamas on October 7.
🧵1) Israel's killing of Hassan Nasrallah is hugely consequential for the Middle East. Hezbollah is the crown jewel of the Islamic Republic of Iran-the one effective enterprise Iran’s revolutionaries have built since 1979-and Nasrallah has been crucial to Iran’s power expansion.
2 Arab Hezbollah has been Persian Iran’s bridge to the five failing Arab states-Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, Iraq, and Gaza-that Tehran has been dominating. Iran provides the resources, but it was often Hezbollah, under Nasrallah’s leadership, that set up and trained these proxies.
3 Hezbollah had already experienced more leadership deaths in the last four months than over the last four decades. In a recent piece, @firasmaksad evoked Lenin: “There are decades when nothing happens, and there are weeks when decades happen.” time.com/7023965/lebano…
1. A short thread on the Iran-Saudi normalization agreement brokered by China, reasons why each country was motivated to sign the agreement, and what to look for to determine whether it will have a meaningful and enduring impact. wsj.com/articles/saudi…
2. What’s in it for Beijing? Simply put China wants stability in the Middle East to ensure the free flow of energy from the region. De-escalation between two regional powers and major energy producers is critical to those objectives.
3. What's in it for Tehran? Iran is deeply isolated, humiliated by months of protests, and heavily reliant on China strategically/economically. This deal lessens its isolation, gains legitimacy for the regime, and strengthens China’s regional influence at the expense of the US.
1. Protestors in the city of Piranshahr, Iranian Kurdistan. Their determination is palpable. Video via @SamRasoulpour
2. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards are using combat weapons against a civilian population in Piranshahr mostly armed with rocks.
3. The Islamic Republic has inflicted disproportionate violence against Iran’s Kurdish population since the beginning of the 1979 revolution. It has never earned them support or legitimacy.