Dan Hind Profile picture
Sep 23 6 tweets 2 min read
Remember when a very rich man, humiliated by a leading tabloid newspaper, set about putting it out of business, and in the process we discovered that much of the media were operating as a criminal syndicate, and then it all went away again? Fun times.
We have no means to discuss public business as discursive equals. Every now and then a foreign news outlet - Al Jazeera, the New York Times - will document how hilariously bent our media-political institutions are. But at the moment there’s not much we can do.
This is why it is such a disaster that the trade unions haven’t invested in building their own communicative forms. Working people will have absolutely no chance against the Monster until they can make sense of what is happening on their own terms.
People are pretty shrewd about what is happening in their family and work life. But as soon as they turn to matters outside their direct experience they are at the mercy of paid liars. That is what has to change, if anything at all is to change for the better.
Not everyone involved in systematically important media organisations is a paid liar, to be fair. Quite a few of them are privilege-drunk dunces who can't even be bothered to wonder aloud why they keep being wrong about things they are paid to understand.
Tagging @johnharris1969 and @Anoosh_C and into this, to ask if you plan to discuss the @AJEnglish #labourleaks documentaries on your podcasts next week. If your listeners wrongly believe that Labour under Corbyn was racist and thuggish, you must want to correct the record.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dan Hind

Dan Hind Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @danhind

Aug 7
In 2019 many people were persuaded that a Labour government under Corbyn would be a material disaster or a moral catastrophe, or both. Many more were convinced that he was 'just like the rest of them'. The result was a decline in the Labour vote and a Conservative victory.
We ought to have a conversation about what happened, because it really matters that a political party offering an end to 40 years of neoliberal asset-stripping and spivvery was crushed in the polls by a government committed to more of the same.
We can argue about the mistakes that the Labour leadership made on Brexit, on its relationship with its own bureaucrats, in its comms strategy. No doubt there were mistakes. But the key to understanding what happened lies in the propaganda campaign that kicked in in 2019.
Read 11 tweets
Jul 23
So much politics this week in Westminster that there was no time to mention publication of the Forde Report, much less to debate its findings, including its claim that the elected leadership was as guilty of factionalism as the unelected bureaucrats who undermined them.
At this point everyone who thinks that they are well informed about politics because they read the Guardian and the New Statesman and listen to Radio 4 are as deluded as the most distracted and impressionable Sun or Mail reader.
A lot of people have already died because of the liberal media's refusal to admit that they might have been wrong about the whole End of History thing. Breaking their hold on soft left opinion in the UK is key to any serious effort to address the actual problems we now face.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 21
One of the joys of this platform is that it allows us to compare and contrast the analyses of politics professors at elite universities and anonymous accounts. And, I ask you, which of these two would you go to for political analysis, if your life depended on it?
And it's not that the professionals of speech only come up short in a few one on ones. Elite discourse around politics in the media as well as academia has converged on a set of assumptions that downplay or eradicate the role of communicative power in shaping outcomes.
This is understandable, even predictable, in the context of media institutions governed by state or market logics. The apparent reluctance of some politics academics to crack open a sociology or media studies book once in a while is less easy to account for.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 14
There was a flurry of irritation on the timeline a few days ago about all the lovely money the Trash Future podcast makes every month, and I thought I would use that as hook to hang my regular messaging about the need for a structurally left media system. First off, the stakes.
If the left wants to win, it has to have its own media. If you don't believe me, ask Victor Orban, who told his conservative allies in the US that to win they had to "have their own media." There's no way round this, no objective material conditions, no charismatic leader.
If left-wing political projects aren't able to reach mass audiences regularly and reliably their supporters will be identified, profiled and targeted with tailored messaging that ensures that popular policies are defeated at the polls. Examples are not hard to find.
Read 13 tweets
Jun 2
Fascinating discussion of the Crown and the media in the UK featuring terrific analysis by @Laura__Clancy and comments by @JonnyDymond that are far more enlightening than I had bargained for. bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0…
JM notes the "public-private nature of the story" and says it means the Royals can maintain a "near monopoly on information .... most of the institutional stuff, the state stuff, even the ceremonial stuff is colourful, but it is not itself interesting, it's actually quite dull."
"What's interesting to audiences is the personal stuff." Note how this public=dull/private=interesting dynamic suppresses inquiry in the nature of the constitution and draws attention towards the dramas of a wealthy family that is also somehow 1066 and all that.
Read 7 tweets
May 7
Some scattered thoughts on the recent elections, with the proviso that turnout was very low in the UK, so we can't learn a great deal about national trends, other than that Labour is failing to reproduce the content-free change-excitement of the mid-90s.
The Lib Dems are gaining in ground against the Conservatives in part because a lot of wealthy pro-Remain voters resent the fact that fear of Corbyn and higher taxes made them feel they had to vote for Johnson in 2019, despite his very obvious shortcomings.
(In a low turnout election the affluent and old, who are disproportionately likely to vote, count for even more than in a GE. Many of them want to vote Conservative, but their scruples won't let them, when the stakes are sufficiently low.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(