1/ Pierre Poilievre says he only learned about Diagolon a month ago. Yet, he was in the House of Commons on February 20th when Diagolon was described in debates no less than 3 times as being a possible violent threat. Was PP simply not paying attention or did he lie about never
2/ having heard of them? Which is more dangerous? A leader who doesn’t pay attention to threats facing the country or a leader who doesn’t care?
Remember: the context of that debate was The Emergencies Act, and whether Canada actually faced a violent threat.
At the very least,
Remember: the context of that debate was The Emergencies Act, and whether Canada actually faced a violent threat.
At the very least,
3/3 Pierre should have done his research on Diagolon at that time. If he didn’t, he is incompetent. If he did, and later misled Canadians about it, then he is a liar.
Which is it @PierrePoilievre?
You tell us.
ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer…
#cdnpoli #Diagolon
Which is it @PierrePoilievre?
You tell us.
ourcommons.ca/DocumentViewer…
#cdnpoli #Diagolon
Update: Diagolon was mentioned SIX TIMES over the course of the Commons debate regarding the Emergencies Act. Not only was he present, he actively participated in those debates.
But he wants us to believe he only learned about them recently? #cdnpoli #PierrePoilievreIsLyingToYou
But he wants us to believe he only learned about them recently? #cdnpoli #PierrePoilievreIsLyingToYou
Update #2: I've created a new, more concise thread that introduces even MORE evidence proving that #PierrePoilievre is full of (sh)it. Enjoy.
https://twitter.com/zen_arcadium/status/1575208278820552704
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
