A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has started hearing the issue regarding the extent of powers under Article 142 to grant divorce when one or both parties are not consenting.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Senior Advocate @IJaising begins submissions.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising: I will address the second question first. The first is powers under 142. In my opinion that's a relatively easy question to answer.

But on the question whether irretrievable breakdown divorce can be granted..

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Justice Kaul: But no. of cases are coming up in such scenarios.. There will be different degrees.

Sr Adv Jaising: The second reference is of more significance- the specific question is when there is absence of consent from one side.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising: I'm taking it one step further.. can the trial court also exercise power?

Justice Kaul: The only impediment - despite law commission recommendations, the legislature has been reluctant.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising: The way i have visualised is- it always struck me as very strange that our matrimonial laws tell you capacity to marry, formality and way to exit a marriage.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising: I will refer to case law to show what courts have said how marriage ought to be.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising: There is no specific provision under Hindu Marriage Act for consent of parties to marry.. whereas in other laws, there is some consent.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising: Let us proceed on the assumption that marriage is a voluntary union between two people.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising: Yes, a marriage is definitely a monogamous association in Indian Law but it definitely does not follow that the two persons are one in the eye of law. If that were the case, there would be no doctrine of divorce.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising refers to a Delhi HC judgment: It was a judgment that refused to strike down the restitution of conjugal rights provision.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising: The judge held that introducing constitutional law into the family was the famous phrase, "introducing a bull in the china shop".

With great respect, I don't agree.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising refers to a Supreme Court judgment from 2021 which sought to define marriage.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising: One) It gives a description of what marriage is meant to be.

Two) What happens when the expectation of amity is gone. Can you still continue to call it a marriage?

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising: A decree for divorce is also considered a matter of status. It is a declaration to the world.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising: Why is it a court of law that has to give a decree of divorce? Because it's a matter of status.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising: The court ought to grant a decree for irretrievable breakdown because all the essential factors have disappeared. They no longer exist. The only question is- how to separate amicably?

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising: I'm in strong disagreement with judgments which indicate that marriage is a sacrament and it's the public policy of India that we don't break marriages.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Justice Kaul: Those are two different things: sacramental is how a marriage is made, whether marriage can break or not is not in doubt. Issue is, under Hindu Marriage Act, divorce is based on fault theory. Irretrievable breakdown is ground reality.

#SupremeCourt #Divorce
Justice Kaul: Two very good people may not be good partners.

Sr Adv Jaising: I understand.. it's not such a b&w issue. There is an overlap.. every marriage where a petition for divorce is filed there are allegation and counters.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising: The the question comes, are we looking at fault theory? It is smuggled in through a provision - no person can take advantage of their own wrong. It has a limited role.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Justice Kaul: What is fault? Somebody will say she doesn't wake up in the morning and give my parents tea.. is it fault theory? Lot of them arise from social norms. From there we attribute faults.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising: That is why this court has held that public policy is not frozen in time.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Sr Adv Jaising: Social norms also change.. therefore, arguments such as it's a sacrament therefore we must not agree to the theory of irretrievable breakdown do no make any sense.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
Justice Kaul: Question is in the divorce- must one person be attributed a fault?

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce
The court rises. Will continue hearing this case tomorrow morning.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Divorce

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench - Live Threads

Bar & Bench - Live Threads Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lawbarandbench

Sep 30
The Supreme Court is hearing an appeal against a division bench order of the Madras HC setting aside single-judge order cancelling election of E Palaniswami as AIADMK General Secretary.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia Image
Senior Advocate Ranjit Kumar reads divison bench order.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia
Kumar: The division bench leaves the main issue open.

Justice Shah: That is for trial.. it's not to be decided at this stage, that's what it says.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtOfIndia
Read 13 tweets
Sep 30
The Supreme Court is hearing a plea claiming that the State emblem at Central Vista is violative of the design specified under the Act of 2005.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia Image
Counsel: There is no scope for artistic innovation for a state emblem.

They are not only describing the design, but also giving a picture in the Act.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia
Counsel: Your Lordships have held that this is a symbol of national honour.

Justice Shah: The impression the emblem gives depends on the mind of the person.

Counsel: We are only asking for correction.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia
Read 4 tweets
Sep 30
Bombay High Court is hearing plea by BJP leader Kirit Somaiya seeking quashing of his own FIR on the ground that it was not properly recorded and not at his instance.

@KiritSomaiya @MumbaiPolice #BombayHighCourt Image
Court: You want to quash your own FiR?

Lawyer from Law Counsellors for Somaiya: At the first instance, the information which I gave is not recorded by the police officer.

Court: These entire prayers then will not come before us.

#BombayHighCourt
Court: Quashing of own FIR, transfer to CBI, and then initiate departmental enquiry? What is this?

#BombayHighCourt
Read 22 tweets
Sep 30
The Supreme Court is hearing a plea by former minister Gali Janardhan Reddy to visit and stay in Bellary for four weeks.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia Image
Senior Advocate Meenakshi Arora for Reddy: The mother of the child lives in Bellary. She's with my family there.

Justice MR Shah: Don't raise your voice, Madam. It will not help you.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia
Justice Shah: You never disclosed the baby was not born in Bellary. We have full sympathy.. What they are saying is the discharge took place only after arguments before this court.

#SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtofIndia
Read 7 tweets
Sep 30
Kerala High Court is hearing two petitions challenging the summons issued by the ED to current and former officials of the Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Board (KIIFB) in connection with its financial transactions esp around masala bonds.
@dir_ed Image
The first plea is moved by KIIFB itself cc challenging the repeated issuance of summons to it's office bearers

Read about the last hearing:
barandbench.com/news/ed-singli…
The other plea is moved by Dr. Thomas Issac, former Kerala Finance Minister, challenging the ED summons issued to him in connection with the KIIFB probe.
@dir_ed
@drthomasisaac

Read about previous hearing:
barandbench.com/news/dr-thomas…
Read 7 tweets
Sep 29
#SupremeCourt hearing Gautam Navlakha's plea seeking house arrest after his regular bail plea was denied. Image
Matter to be taken at 3.

Adv Kanu Agarwal: I wasn't aware that my lords had not received the letter (of adjournment). Let me get instructions this matter was listed late.

Adv: Let him out for two weeks atleast he needs a colonoscopy.
Sibal: Has no criminal history.

Justice Joseph: Let him breathe some fresh air. He wasn't even convicted in any small IPC offence earlier.
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(