A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has started hearing the issue regarding the extent of powers under Article 142 to grant divorce when one or both parties are not consenting.
Sr Adv Jaising: The way i have visualised is- it always struck me as very strange that our matrimonial laws tell you capacity to marry, formality and way to exit a marriage.
Sr Adv Jaising: There is no specific provision under Hindu Marriage Act for consent of parties to marry.. whereas in other laws, there is some consent.
Sr Adv Jaising: Yes, a marriage is definitely a monogamous association in Indian Law but it definitely does not follow that the two persons are one in the eye of law. If that were the case, there would be no doctrine of divorce.
Sr Adv Jaising: The court ought to grant a decree for irretrievable breakdown because all the essential factors have disappeared. They no longer exist. The only question is- how to separate amicably?
Sr Adv Jaising: I'm in strong disagreement with judgments which indicate that marriage is a sacrament and it's the public policy of India that we don't break marriages.
Justice Kaul: Those are two different things: sacramental is how a marriage is made, whether marriage can break or not is not in doubt. Issue is, under Hindu Marriage Act, divorce is based on fault theory. Irretrievable breakdown is ground reality.
Justice Kaul: Two very good people may not be good partners.
Sr Adv Jaising: I understand.. it's not such a b&w issue. There is an overlap.. every marriage where a petition for divorce is filed there are allegation and counters.
Sr Adv Jaising: The the question comes, are we looking at fault theory? It is smuggled in through a provision - no person can take advantage of their own wrong. It has a limited role.
Justice Kaul: What is fault? Somebody will say she doesn't wake up in the morning and give my parents tea.. is it fault theory? Lot of them arise from social norms. From there we attribute faults.
Sr Adv Jaising: Social norms also change.. therefore, arguments such as it's a sacrament therefore we must not agree to the theory of irretrievable breakdown do no make any sense.
The Supreme Court is hearing an appeal against a division bench order of the Madras HC setting aside single-judge order cancelling election of E Palaniswami as AIADMK General Secretary.
Bombay High Court is hearing plea by BJP leader Kirit Somaiya seeking quashing of his own FIR on the ground that it was not properly recorded and not at his instance.
Justice Shah: You never disclosed the baby was not born in Bellary. We have full sympathy.. What they are saying is the discharge took place only after arguments before this court.
Kerala High Court is hearing two petitions challenging the summons issued by the ED to current and former officials of the Kerala Infrastructure Investment Fund Board (KIIFB) in connection with its financial transactions esp around masala bonds. @dir_ed
The first plea is moved by KIIFB itself cc challenging the repeated issuance of summons to it's office bearers
The other plea is moved by Dr. Thomas Issac, former Kerala Finance Minister, challenging the ED summons issued to him in connection with the KIIFB probe. @dir_ed @drthomasisaac