1/
The abuse shown in #Panorama is not shocking or surprising to those of us with experience of contemporary #InstitutionalAbuse in mental health services

Sadly, it resonates with ongoing interventions elsewhere in the UK

🧵:Some actions all MH professionals can take right now
2/
Other victims have been consistently describing similar concerns in other areas. We must acknowledge this, and reflect on what it takes for victims' accounts to be taken seriously and acted on

We need to decide whether we are happy continuing to rely on undercover reporters
3/
In our own services, we can't afford to just say, "This couldn't happen here"

Instead we must ask, "What measures do we need to prevent this happening here?"

And, "Would we know how to protect victims if we become aware of abuse either locally or in another area?"
4/
We need to be proud of and promote high quality mental health services

These are separate conversation: the existence of abusive services does not negate high quality, safe MH services, and the existence of high quality, safe MH services does not negate the need to stop abuse
5/
Maintaining positive service cultures free from abuse needs constant work and renewal

We need to engage with all existing measures: PVG/DBS checks, ASP/safeguarding training, external inspection. They may feel burdensome, but they have a purpose.

There is more we need to do
6/
We need to mitigate against normalised deviance and groupthink

Normalised deviance = routine deviation from good practice standards, which becomes so routine it isn't noticed or challenged

Groupthink = prioritising group cohesion over responding openly to concerns
7/
Measures to mitigate against normalised deviance and groupthink:

Externally facilitated reflective practice

Membership of national quality network

Other external networking: conferences, peer groups, mentoring
8/
For prevention of and response to abuse, knowledge and skills are vital. Given the prevalence and risk in institutional settings (including community and acute hospitals), this should be a larger part of training curricula. Until then, we need to study
9/
ASP/safeguarding training tends to emphasise signs in victims. The biggest warning sign that a patient is being abused is them telling you about it

We need to equip ourselves with knowledge of perpetrator characteristics and warning flags, at individual & institutional levels
10/
Knowledge of perpetrator or institutional characteristics allows us to recognise and challenge without waiting for victims' disclosure, and to recognise common patterns when a victim does disclose

Perpetrators may abuse patients in front of others, or may overstep boundaries
11/
Problematic teams may routinely use derogatory language about patients, may have normalised poor practices such as exclusion or victim-blaming, and may ignore or defend overtly abusive colleagues
12/
Problematic institutions may ignore victims' complaints, fail to respond to or withhold information from regulators and inspectors, and prioritise monitoring victims' social media over engaging with Independent Reviews

MH professionals need to know these signs and patterns
13/
We all need to acknowledge that there are patients in our local services who have experienced #InstitutionalAbuse in health or social care

They may not feel safe to disclose details, but you will have met them

We must plan trauma-informed approaches to meet their needs
14/
These are just some thoughts on actions individual MH professionals can take, in response to people saying "What can we do?" It doesn't consider the institutional actions which are needed to develop systems of adult and child protection

Summary:
1 Study
2 Network externally
15/
Books:
Abuse of the doctor-patient relationship 2010 Eds Subotsky,Bewley,Crowe

Institutional abuse: perspectives across the life course 1999 Eds Manthorpe,Penhale,Stanley

Institutional corruption: a study in applied philosophy 2017 Miller

Epistemic Injustice 2007 Fricker
16/
DOI: I have contributed to a book chapter on this topic, currently in press for publication 2023 - but as with much academic publishing I won't get any money from book sales, it was written as a service to the profession in the hope of improving standards and quality of care
17/
If I remember, I will link the book into this thread when it's published, but we're not yet at copy editing so it will be a while.

The first action I'd recommend is to start by reading the CQC report on closed cultures, which lists warning signs well

cqc.org.uk/guidance-provi…
18/18
...And if you think others might find this helpful, please share with your followers by retweeting the tweet at the top of the thread. We have far to go but it is imperative that we take action

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alex T-Ho-Ho-Ho-mson

Alex T-Ho-Ho-Ho-mson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlexBThomson

Jun 26, 2019
A thread:
Given recent news about prosecuting people across the UK for surviving suicide attempts, it's worth considering whether and when (if ever) clinical psychologists, psychiatrists and psychiatric nurses should endorse, encourage or incite prosecution as a clinical decision
Firstly it is worth starting with the codes of ethics & conduct

Clinical psychologists: "Promote & protect the interests of service users & carers"

Psychiatrists: "Make the care of your patient your first concern"

Psychiatric nurses: "Prioritise people"
Next, frame the question. Decisions to charge are made by police. Decisions to prosecute by the Crown Office & Procurator Fiscal Service, the Public Prosecution Service or the Crown Prosecution Service. Psychologists, psychiatrists & nurses can encourage or dissuade prosecution
Read 50 tweets
Feb 28, 2019
Twitter is the ideal medium for short research reports, so get ready for some SCIENCE [thread]

Title: IRN BRU VARIETIES - A DOUBLE-BLIND TASTE EVALUATION

1/
Background:
Despite controversy over the reduced sugar content, Irn Bru now comes in three varieties. Although the majority prefer the regular version, this may be influenced by assumptions or expectations about the taste of sugar-free fizzy drinks.
2/
Furthermore, debate rages as to whether Sugar Free (0.7kcal/100ml) or Xtra (1.0kcal/100ml) is the better 'no sugar' version & whether a 0.3kcal/100ml difference is significant.

Objectives:
To evaluate the taste of all three Irn Bru varieties in blinded, controlled conditions
3/
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(