Ethical Skeptic ☀ Profile picture
Oct 1, 2022 5 tweets 2 min read Read on X
OK, found it.

The set dynamics are complex, but the principle is straightforward.

When a death cert lists Cancer as the UCoD and Covid as MCoD - the UCoD & MCoD are being swapped, and Covid is being listed as the UCoD 100% (425/wk). Image
This results in 20% of all Covid deaths each week, also happening to be persons dying of Cancer - which is egregiously higher than it should be.

This is clear over-attribution = equates to exactly the difference between the Cancer and All Other ICD-10 code lag curves.

Q.E.D.😎 Image
The problem facing the CDC, is therefore twofold:

1. How to hide this now that the CFR is half that of H1N1 (normal cold CFR)

2. What does one do when Covid Mortality is no longer substantial enough to conceal the excess Cancer Mortality? Image
Get the popcorn ready... 🍿 🤓
Clarified/corrected version of chart, 1.1 Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ethical Skeptic ☀

Ethical Skeptic ☀ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EthicalSkeptic

Aug 10
Intendit (Intent is/does)

We have long held that the standard code features a degenerative symmetry. However, once we discover that what we have misinterpreted as degeneracy is actually a highly sophisticated symmetry, elegantly aligned with amino acid nucleon count—merely part of an advanced and concatenated symmetry that existed prior to evolution itself—the playing field changes monumentally and irrevocably. This is no longer an accident.Image
ChatGPT-4o almost gets it right, but it is close enough in plain English summary. This is below the Bridgman Point, but it gets most of the principle across:

"For a long time, scientists believed that the genetic code had a certain "degenerative symmetry," meaning that different DNA sequences (codons) could result in the same amino acid by what seemed like a random, redundant process. However, new findings suggest that this isn't just random or redundant at all. Instead, there's a highly sophisticated and precise pattern where the number of nucleons (protons and neutrons) in amino acids is perfectly aligned with the structure of the genetic code. This intricate pattern seems so advanced that it suggests a level of design that existed before the process of evolution even began. This discovery challenges the idea that this pattern could have happened by accident, fundamentally changing how we understand the origins of life.

This pattern is not just a coincidence; it's a deliberate and complex symmetry that was likely built into life from the very start."
Neither theist nor nihilist atheist will be happy with this observation however. As they are both wrong.

Take note, this code is not about evolution, as it instead concerns abiogenesis. Nor did it occur inside any domain of evolution. This is the standard code, a prerequisite upon which our DNA is based. So it could not have evolved, as there was no such thing as 'evolution' when it was formed.

However, the creator of this standard code was subject to the laws of the universe, just as are we. A very lesser god, as it were - using the tools of chemistry and distributed ledger warfare to conquer the cosmos.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 28
It is amazing how many legal professionals lack critical language and deductive skills - and completely missed the precedent set by this case. This was not a case-specific ruling.

Justice Alito concurs in his dissent:

“What the officials did in this case was more subtle than [ham-handed censorship] ...Officials who read today’s decision ...will get the message. If a coercive campaign is carried out with enough sophistication, it may get by. That is not a message this court should send.”

And the "enough sophistication" bar is very very low in this instance. As we had three parties with clear sets of communication to intend harm to specific parties. Avoiding this litmus is achievable by even the most obtuse of Party Member in the future.
And here is the kicker:

If this case is re-filed so that a clear chain of standing (not simply 'standing' alone) is established, that IS case specific. A victory for the Plaintiffs in Murthy v. Missouri no longer serves to dispel the precedent the Court set here.

Even lawyers involved in the case itself did not comprehend the ethical question being answered here.

We are in trouble.
What the unskilled case presentation has done, is akin to 'overselling' in marketing parlance - by having your first product hyped too much and too far ahead of its skis, thereafter under-delivering, a company creates negative goodwill inside their brand.

This is why we have FaceBook and not MySpace.

The second mouse to the trap gets the cheese. But if the first mouse held the locus of human rights, and self-immolates, we have f---ked up for everyone involved.

This is why a strategy is essential in a critical path of prosecution. Not simply a bundle of correct legal principles.
Read 4 tweets
May 26
If you want to comprehend what the Khufu Pyramid indeed is... refer to my article below.

It is not particularly good news. However, it may be important for us to monitor this entire sequence of events as a species.

theethicalskeptic.com/2024/05/12/exo…

Image
Image
Science advances upon this - a Paradigm Shift:

A white crow or dead body observation forces us to introduce a novel paradigm. Thereafter, does that novel paradigm bear elegance, along with greater explanatory and probative power than did the old one.
Skepticism does not mean 'never undertake the risk of proposing a hypothesis'.

The whole mission of ethical skepticism is to dispel this Mind Trick that skepticism is 'doubting everything' (until you are just a Narrative Sponge). Because they never teach you to doubt the Narrative, only new ideas.

That is not skepticism.
Read 4 tweets
May 18
I was silent in the vehicle on the way back to the hotel in Cairo. My stomach hung like lead. My colleagues with me on that second trip to Giza nudged: "TES, you OK? You're awfully quiet."

Once seen, this cannot be unseen. Image
And perhaps this is the culmination of decades of Officer of the Deck and Captain seamanship, along with having headed a materials research corporation

...nonetheless, it was staring us in the face all this time.
It helps to actually read my hypothesis before commenting...

theethicalskeptic.com/2024/05/12/exo…
Read 4 tweets
Apr 17
They lied to you - Cancer deaths are elevated and rising. Image
They lied to you - Cancer cases and treatment costs are elevated and rising. Image
They lied to you - People are searching for answers for new cancer in their lives. Image
Read 9 tweets
Mar 26
Yep... set & drift analysis suggests loss of main steerage and power while making 13 knots in a crosswind.

Not an act of terror or drunk helmsman.

Back to bed... everyone stand down. Image
This timing matches the extended video showing the beginning of the 'turn' pretty well. Just a touch over 3 minutes of casualty loss in steerage.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(