Tom Nichols Profile picture
Oct 3 5 tweets 2 min read
The war in #Ukraine is not just about Ukraine: Putin has made it clear that he's at war with the entire international order created after 1945. After failing in a stupid gamble on imperial conquest, he's trying to raise the stakes and pit #Russia against the world.

/1
He thinks that by doing so, he's showing resolve. What he's actually doing is admitting that he has screwed up so colossally that his only way out is to challenge the entire global system of cooperation that has thwarted him. /2
His attempts to change borders by force were bad enough. But now he's trying to absorb a neighbor, and he's decided to declare that the real source of his problems is the way the modern system of international security works. This escalation is his doing, and his alone. /3
There are many Russians - and I am certain, many Russian elites - who want Russia to live in peace with the rest of the world. Only Putin and his cronies are the ones saying that they have no such intentions. He's now threatening the world and angry the world isn't caving. /4
He's lost in Ukraine and the failures are going to keep coming. All of this was set in motion by him, and it's within his power to stop it all. But the rest of the world is not to blame for refusing to bend to blackmail. We've seen that movie already. /5x

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tom Nichols

Tom Nichols Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RadioFreeTom

Sep 14
If you read @tzimmer_history's thread, and you'd like to read my explanations at more length about why democracy is under global attack, I wrote an entire book about it.
amazon.com/Our-Own-Worst-…

But a longish (and incomplete) thread on MAGA follows. /1
Prof. Zimmer chafes - understandably - at the "nihilism" argument as too simple. And he has a point that some of the putative leaders of MAGA world do have something a racial and religious fascist ideology. But he's missing something important. /2
The point is that the MAGA rank and file are ideologically incoherent, and imputing to all of them some notion of coherence runs the danger of elevating this movement, in our minds and in public interactions, into something grander and more formidable than it really is. /3
Read 18 tweets
Sep 6
I have a suggestion about better Twittering. This is not about any one subject (because this happens in cycles; the last time was about student loans).

It's about disagreements and long debates. And I mean this as sincerely meant (and constructive) advice. /1
If you don't happen to like my (or anyone's) position on something, that's fine. But check the date of the posts to which you're responding. If you're weighing in four days later *for the first time*, the odds are that the person "keeping it going" is...you.
/2
There are ways to avoid this.

1. By checking the thread and reading back to see if your point has been made and responded to.
2. By Googling the person you're tweeting and seeing if, in fact, I have "ever said anything about Subject X before."

/3
Read 8 tweets
Aug 7
I agree more with @JRubinBlogger here than @pashulman. Rubin says women should think twice about attending schools where women's rights have been curtailed, Shulman argues this would make things worse. But it's not the job of a freshman to improve the political situation. /1
@JRubinBlogger @pashulman It may be true that the institutions had nothing to do with the decisions of the state legislature, but thats' not the point. Going to college isn't some duty to go rescue the institution. If a woman feels uncomfortable coming to your state, that's your problem, not hers. /2
She's not required to think of the campus as a haven from a repressive legislature just to create a more geographically diverse student body. Her first obligation is to her own safety and sense of well-being. She's not there to help the school make a stand against the state. /3
Read 6 tweets
Jul 31
So, tonight's @MeTV Star Trek TOS is "A Taste of Armageddon." I actually require my @HarvardExt students in my Cold War pop culture class to watch this. A thread on Star Trek and the Cold War.

Energize.

/1
@MeTV @HarvardExt This and "A Private Little War" are among the many ST:TOS eps that were Cold War influenced. The Memory Alpha site claims this one was influenced by Vietnam casualties; can't verify that but seems sensible. It's about fighting wars by spreadsheets and computers. /2
In general, the war in "A Taste of Armageddon" looks like what would happen if Robert McNamara had been allowed to run a virtual nuclear war between two planets for 500 years. Everything would be tidy and calculated and the deaths would be in the zillions and go on forever. /3
Read 9 tweets
Jul 25
A lot of you are asking why I think this is a very bad idea. A few notes.

First, I am in *favor* of dumping NATO's tactical inventory. During the Cold War, different story; our strategy was to use them if overrun. Today, no point to them. But this offer is bad. /1
It's an offer that violates some basic diplomatic common sense. Russia attacking UKR should not generate an offer from NATO to denuclearize. That's like being blackmailed and offering stuff the blackmailer didn't even ask for. /2
Also, it's not up to NATO to make deals on Ukraine's behalf. The issue is RUSSIA'S WAR OF AGGRESSION, not NATO's nukes. Why help the Russians change the subject and make it about NATO?! That's just flat out diplomatic idiocy. /3
Read 6 tweets
Jul 15
Yes, and the folks mad at me for saying SNW > TNG? Here's the thing: I *never liked TNG*, with the exception of one episode: "Yesterday's Enterprise." I found TNG touchy-feely, and instantly disliked Wesley, Troi, and Data as stunts. (Don't even start me about Guinan.) /1
TNG was very much a product of the 90s: Let's talk about our feelings! Also, space is really pretty safe most of the time. "Our mission, captain?" "To the 7/11 for beer, Number 1." That's why they had to invent the Borg: Because otherwise, it was just a living room in space. /2
I will grant you that Stewart saved the show; he was an amazing captain, but again, he was running a space-faring day school and therapy session.

And Holodecks. Just no.

/3
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(