Appalling, arrogant, irresponsible behavior by major nuclear-armed states (U.S., Britain, Russia, India, and China) who are questioning Pacific island nations' call for nuclear legacy help at UN Human Rights Council. See: reuters.com/world/major-un… cc @USUN@UnderSecT#nuclearban 1/
@USUN@UnderSecT From 1946 to 1958, the United States government tested 67 high-yield nuclear weapons in the atmosphere and under water in the Marshall Islands. This reckless and dangerous series of nuclear detonations caused incalculable harm to the land and people of the Marshall Islands. 2/
@USUN@UnderSecT As the 2012 report by the UN Special Rapporteur on the impact of the U.S. nuclear testing program on human rights in the Republic of the Marshall Island concluded: “The nuclear testing resulted in both immediate and continuing effects on the human rights of the Marshallese..." 3/
@USUN@UnderSecT "...radiation from the testing resulted in fatalities and in acute and long-term health complications ... [and] near-irreversible environmental contamination, leading to the loss of livelihoods and lands...many people continue to experience indefinite displacement.” 4/
@USUN@UnderSecT It is abundantly clear that the U.S. gov't hasn't fulfilled its obligations to the Marshall Islands w/respect to issues of nuclear justice, and it has a moral and legal responsibility to do so, and before the conclusion of negotiations on the new Compact of Free Association. 5/
@USUN@UnderSecT Those obligations include but are not limited to: payment of all awards of the Nuclear Claims Tribunal; providing appropriate health monitoring and health care for all Marshallese; and environmental remediation necessary to reduce exposure to radiation and other toxins. 6/
@USUN@UnderSecT In addition, the @JoeBiden administration should issue a formal apology from the United States gov't to the people of Marshall Islands for the profound and adverse health and environmental and social consequences of U.S. atmospheric nuclear testing in the Pacific. 7/
@USUN@UnderSecT@JoeBiden And just as the Clinton admin. did in 1994 thru its "Openness Initiative" relating to Cold War-era gov't human radiation experiments and n-testing effects on atomic veterans (see researchgate.net/publication/11… ) immediately declassify all docs related to U.S. testing in the Pacific. 8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's get real Anatoly #Antonov@RusEmbUSA It is @KremlinRussia_E who has issued threats of nuclear weapons use and started a war that raises the risk of nuclear annihilation. Russia cannot have it both ways and claim to be a "responsible" nuclear actor when it is clearly not. 1/
@RusEmbUSA@KremlinRussia_E It is #Putin who has issued nuclear threats to shield Russia's aggression against a nonnuclear, democratic, independent state, raised the alert levels of Russian forces, overseen an ICBM flight tests, and authorized Russian state TV to air simulations of attacks on Europe. 2/
@RusEmbUSA@KremlinRussia_E Fortunately, and so far, Biden and NATO have not matched Russia's nuclear taunts and have taken the threats seriously and have made it clear they do not want U.S. and NATO forces involved in the conflict in Ukraine, but will act to help Ukraine defend its people and territory. 3/
Surprise! Misinfo from @SenTedCruz on benefits of restoring 2015 #IranDeal Yes, the admin. has an assessment, which finds there ARE significant benefits, namely increasing time it would take Iran to produce an SQ of fissile material from 2 wks today to approx. 9 mnths. 1/
@SenTedCruz In addition, restoring compliance with JCPOA would ensure enhanced IAEA inspections, which are essential to provide early warning in the event Iran tries to evade the JCPOA restrictions or violate its safeguards obligations. 2/
@SenTedCruz Trump's decision to exit JCPOA in 2018 not only failed to produce the promised results; it opened the way for Iran to take steps breach the JCPOA’s nuclear limits and accelerate its capacity to produce bomb-grade nuclear material. Pursuing the same failed strategy is lunacy. 3/
Nuclear arms control is a serious business that requires serious ideas and serious diplomacy. Unfortunately @USArmsControl continues to demonstrate that @realDonaldTrump is unserious and lacks a real arms control strategy. Some comments 1/
@USArmsControl@realDonaldTrump First, it should be noted that China’s position has not changed even if Team Trump wants to say it is shifting regarding talks on things nuclear. What @FuCong17 said on July 7
@USArmsControl@realDonaldTrump@FuCong17 Unfortunately, U.S. officials and Chinese officials are talking past one another. Rather than use existing P5 format for engage in necessary discussions on strategic stability and nuclear arms control, U.S. officials continue to insist on separate trilateral talks w/Russia. 3/
What to make of Trump's support for Putin's proposal for summit of the leaders of Perm 5 members of the UNSC on n-arms control and security issues? What does this mean for #NewSTART, #NPT, and further action on disarmament? Some background & analysis. 1/
A P5 leaders summit on nuclear weapons is a potentially important development. There hasn't been such a mtg since Sept. 2009 when Obama convened UNSC for Resolution 1887. See armscontrol.org/pressroom/2009… This time around real progress is going to be difficult. Some background ... 2/
its important to note that the P5 heads of state summit idea is not a Trump initiative; the WH is responding to an invitation from President Putin sent to the leaders of the P5 members of the UNSC in late-January. Putin spoke about his concept in a speech a few days earlier. 3/