Underpinned by Dunlovsky et al., @InspiredLearn_ warns us against being lured by beautiful highlighting as an indicator of effective study #rEDSurrey22
If practice testing and spaced practice are most effective strategies, why are students not using these as often as we might hope? #rEDSurrey22
Distinguishing between learning and performance makes sense of why much of what we see in the classroom is superficial.
Important to consider that much of what we see are temporary fluctuations of knowledge acquisition. ‘Short term performance is a poor proxy for long term learning.’ #rEDSurrey22
BUT learning is not visible, whilst performance is visible. From performance, we infer learning.
Actually, rather than L vs P, one can lead to inferences made about the other. These are not binary terms.
Performance correctly and consistently is more likely to be an indicator of learning. It means we need to think carefully about the design of assessment and that it is fit for purpose. #rEDSurrey22
(As an aside, if you ever get to see @InspiredLearn_ deliver, really recommend. From a PD design aspect, this is a masterclass: how to establish shared language, non examples and examples and drawing out implications for the theory). #rEDSurrey22
Drawing on the words of @Nick_J_Rose , @InspiredLearn_ outlines the importance of allowing pupils to forget (we might avoid doing this, because the performative feels more comforting, but it’s superficial and not sustained) #rEDSurrey22
It is likely no such thing as an optimal gap that would cater for all pupils. We can only really cater for the most and this is a key limitation of distributed practice. Making learning effortful is important, but practically, very difficult to do x30 when prior knowledge is..
Interleaving can aid conceptual understanding. It forces pupils to discriminate and not just apply a method. @InspiredLearn_#rEDSurrey22
Reintroducing old ideas when teaching related new ideas is key here (I have had LOTS of conversations with ECTs about making connections across content with pupils this week. It’s a really underrated tool IMO). #rEDSurrey22
Interleaving is more likely to lead to pupils making mistakes, but this provides pupils with the opp to explain the mistake and the concept that underpins it. #rEDSurrey22 (succinct task design is critical here)
Mixing up between disciplines is best avoided - but really helpful for making out distinction of concepts that pupils mix up. #rEDSurrey22
So why do pupils pick ineffective strategies? (A little controversial: is this the same reason we inadvertently choose ineffective teaching strategies that encourage performance?) #rEDSurrey22
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
First session #rEDSurrey22 is @msybibi drawing really succinct connections between coaching, learning and effective mechanisms of professional development.
An interesting discussion of how we distinguish between coaching and mentoring, how interchangeable the terms have become- and does it matter? #rEDSurrey22
Which makes me consider just how important contracting is to establishing the purpose of the conversation. @msybibi outlines that pure coaching is non directive.
🧵 Lots of talk around workbook design as a way not just to create a shared language at departmental level, but also minimise workload so teachers can focus on the important stuff: tailoring their lessons for their students.
A few materials to help ⬇️
Spending some time in departments discussing how to create a format that supports your subject and builds familiarity and knowledge over time.
Several messages asking for exam marking recommendations. I’ve never outsourced but I know many who have used @ChapterEdu and they come highly recommended. A few things to note when outsourcing marking:
💫 ensure to carry out due diligence to ensure… ⬇️
The company are legitimate and able to trade as such.
💫 Exercise caution around any explicit mention of exam board specialisms. Examiners are breaking terms of appointment if they use their role in a commercial capacity:
💫 Ask questions around the company’s rigour to ensure their data is reliable. If public funds are going to be put to outsourcing marking, it’s crucial that it’s going to result in data that will be at least more reliable than any possible teacher bias that may have occurred..
🧵 I’ve been thinking about collaborative curriculum development and why it’s so important..
💭 the *perfect* English curriculum doesn’t exist, because it needs to attend to context- context of who it will serve, but also who enacts it.
💭 this is why diversity of thought, underpinned by solid frameworks for difficult conversations make for *amazing* subject level debate in departments.
💭 It also means that the *what* is synonymous to the *how* of curriculum. Understanding curriculum as several micro- level implementation processes is a helpful way to begin to consider navigating the process of change.
🧵
I’ve spent the last few months increasingly interested in how we communicate in schools: to develop professional relationships, instigate change, make judgements or decisions, or aid improvement over time. As a great deal of our work in schools is intangible, the discourse..
We choose to engage in is in some part the vehicle through which we identify and drive change. As Annie Dillard states, ‘how we spend our time is how we live our lives,’ as in #StopTalkingAboutWellbeing, I highlighted what a difference conversations can make to..
Having a sense of purpose at work. It’s the reason I am not a fan of an email: