Dramatic waning of effectiveness of vaccines, in a public health strategy that is vaccination only. The herd of elephants in the room for our Covid ‘strategy’. UKHSA data (see link at end). Symptomatic disease first. (Experts welcome to comment!) /1 #auspol#covid19aus
This data suggests it makes little difference if you were boosted, if AZ was your first 2 shots. Effectiveness against symptomatic disease near zero after 20 weeks in both cases. This was also the vaccine given to highest risk, older Australians. /2
Pfizer followed by Pfizer booster seems even worse than no booster. A little better with Moderna booster, but remembering again many Australians are still at 2 doses of any vaccine, thanks to the previous PM’s election campaign. And 20% effectiveness either way i.e. very low. /3
Moderna fares quite a bit better, if boosted. (More on boosters in Australia in a moment.) Symptomatic disease has been consistently minimised as an issue, but significant impacts on workforce absenteeism and LongCovid are bringing attention back to it. Hospitalisations next. /4
Effectiveness against hospitalisation may be marginally better if you’re not boosted, after 6 months (but may reflect vaccination demographics - older people more likely to be boosted). A range from 60-90%, which explains significant ongoing hospitalisation numbers. /5
Even at the upper end of that range, say 90%, with enormous infection numbers/transmission, that still translates into unmanageable numbers of people needing hospital beds. Now to bring the Australian context to this data, the herd of elephants in the room. /6
About 15% of Australians have not had even 2 doses of a vaccine, let alone a booster. Only just over half of Australians have had a booster shot, and only 15% have had 2 boosters. In a National Cabinet strategy of vaccination only, we’re not even doing that. /7
Even more seriously, by October (i.e. now) even boosted people are past the range of efficacy shown in the UKHSA data, which is 20 weeks. Both 2 and 3-dose Australians mostly had their final shots around April. So, what’s the plan? /8
Heading towards Christmas with existing vaccinations - our only real strategy - well past their optimum efficacy date. And many Australians significantly under-vaccinated to boot. The only mention I’ve seen of updating the vaccination strategy is talk of getting boosters…/9
…with our annual flu shots. Up to 6 or more months away. Jane Halton mentioned there’s talk of only buying enough to match how many flu shots are given annually i.e. nothing like even a majority of the population. All of this suggests Australia is about to experience…/10
…what the UK is now experiencing. Significant increases in infection and disease, including severe disease and hospitalisation, caused by waning immunity and absence of other protective measures. The initial hopium of vaccinating our way out of the pandemic could only ever…/11
…last as long as those initial vaccinations lasted. We’ve not only arrived at that point, it’s probably already behind us. /end
Social media is not just where people share information. It’s a replacement for society itself, and intended to be. The decoupling of societies from their foundations.
Now, a literal de-coupling! This fascinating data will get a range of interpretations I’m sure. /1
Initial analysis shows the trend being driven strongly by women, enabled by their use of software via their mobile phones, to ‘leapfrog’ their usual cultural options.
That sounds extremely plausible. Women wanting a better cultural deal. But I think it’s more than that. /2
Because I suspect online life, and particularly social media, doesn’t offer a new deal. It offers you ongoing dependency, to the apps.
It decouples our lives from some basic social and cultural institutional foundations. /3
For 5 years now many of us have come here to express anger and disbelief that basic things like controlling the spread of a pandemic aren’t being done.
A few years ago I realised doing that is part of the problem. Mistaking these platforms for society. /1
These platforms operationalise a view of society. It’s what IT more generally has always done. Technologies embed a view of the world.
They promote and produce a view of society that says ‘the people’ generate society. /2
Anybody who follows me knows I think this is a suicidal belief, for civilisations. Not only do ‘the people’ not run societies (and never have), ‘the people’ is not even a thing.
It’s a retrospective justification for high status individuals and groups, for their actions. /3
The 20th century was a century of revolutions. Russia, China. And we had one too, the 1960s ‘counter-cultural’ revolution.
Like Burke I think all revolutions are disasters for societies. They can be the catastrophes I often say bring the only real change. But…. /1
They’re not good change. They can sweep away existing status hierarchies. But they just replace them with new ones. Orwell’s Animal Farm was about that.
Burke’s reflections on the French Revolution of that time were prescient too. What did that revolution lead to? /2
An even greater ‘authoritarian’ status hierarchy than the one it replaced. Napoleon.
We have a harder time seeing this same dysfunctional pattern in our own Western societies, because our revolution seems more benign. /3
Something that seems one of those classic stories of ‘community’, people apparently making the effort to offer the community (whatever they think that means) something special.
Christmas lights. How’d that work out? /2
It worked out the way all sociality and ‘connection’ works out. Badly. Because we have not the first clue about what connection really means.
Connection creates the battles for status that I call team sports, and Will Storr calls status games. /3