Dramatic waning of effectiveness of vaccines, in a public health strategy that is vaccination only. The herd of elephants in the room for our Covid ‘strategy’. UKHSA data (see link at end). Symptomatic disease first. (Experts welcome to comment!) /1 #auspol#covid19aus
This data suggests it makes little difference if you were boosted, if AZ was your first 2 shots. Effectiveness against symptomatic disease near zero after 20 weeks in both cases. This was also the vaccine given to highest risk, older Australians. /2
Pfizer followed by Pfizer booster seems even worse than no booster. A little better with Moderna booster, but remembering again many Australians are still at 2 doses of any vaccine, thanks to the previous PM’s election campaign. And 20% effectiveness either way i.e. very low. /3
Moderna fares quite a bit better, if boosted. (More on boosters in Australia in a moment.) Symptomatic disease has been consistently minimised as an issue, but significant impacts on workforce absenteeism and LongCovid are bringing attention back to it. Hospitalisations next. /4
Effectiveness against hospitalisation may be marginally better if you’re not boosted, after 6 months (but may reflect vaccination demographics - older people more likely to be boosted). A range from 60-90%, which explains significant ongoing hospitalisation numbers. /5
Even at the upper end of that range, say 90%, with enormous infection numbers/transmission, that still translates into unmanageable numbers of people needing hospital beds. Now to bring the Australian context to this data, the herd of elephants in the room. /6
About 15% of Australians have not had even 2 doses of a vaccine, let alone a booster. Only just over half of Australians have had a booster shot, and only 15% have had 2 boosters. In a National Cabinet strategy of vaccination only, we’re not even doing that. /7
Even more seriously, by October (i.e. now) even boosted people are past the range of efficacy shown in the UKHSA data, which is 20 weeks. Both 2 and 3-dose Australians mostly had their final shots around April. So, what’s the plan? /8
Heading towards Christmas with existing vaccinations - our only real strategy - well past their optimum efficacy date. And many Australians significantly under-vaccinated to boot. The only mention I’ve seen of updating the vaccination strategy is talk of getting boosters…/9
…with our annual flu shots. Up to 6 or more months away. Jane Halton mentioned there’s talk of only buying enough to match how many flu shots are given annually i.e. nothing like even a majority of the population. All of this suggests Australia is about to experience…/10
…what the UK is now experiencing. Significant increases in infection and disease, including severe disease and hospitalisation, caused by waning immunity and absence of other protective measures. The initial hopium of vaccinating our way out of the pandemic could only ever…/11
…last as long as those initial vaccinations lasted. We’ve not only arrived at that point, it’s probably already behind us. /end
AI is transforming our culture in almost every way, in the same way that social media did decades ago.
But much more quickly. And I think on balance in a profoundly curative way.
AI is our only hope of rescuing civilisation from social media. I think it’s that important.
/1
Why such sweeping claims? For two reasons. One because I think the toxicity of social media is almost universally misunderstood and understated.
Social media creates hypersociality. Sociality is violence. Hypersociality is collapse of civilisations. Mass imitative rivalry.
/2
This is wilfully unseen because the most popular assumption in play is the opposite, that mass sociality is the growth of ‘the people’ running societies. It’s ‘democracy’, flourishing.
This is an almost universal belief, shared by users and owners of these platforms.
/3
Dunkelman traces how nation-building institutions now struggle to build anything at all. We can easily list those who obstruct this building work, like the sponsored small government movements that are really about entrenching established power.
But, there’s more…
/1
Dunkelman points out that it’s often progressives who also lead the obstruction, by their longstanding campaigns against centralised power. Their demand that power be held to account.
Combined, this led to the emergence of a ‘vetocracy’. A wonderful concept.
/2
A generalised power of saying ‘no’, to everything. Of veto, from an explosion of interests and groups.
Why this happened is where I think we can go further than Dunkelman. He talks about proceduralism overpowering outcomes.
/3
Vaccination is failing because we’re misdiagnosing anti-vax as the population being more ‘hesitant’ about vaccines. The same myths we wallow in about democracy, that it’s led by ‘the people’.
All change is led. Distrust in vaccination has been led. By a very small number of mostly identifiable people. Human groups of whatever size are NEVER led by the people in the groups themselves.
/1
Societies are always networked, with hubs that represent the various social groupings, a nucleus of ‘influence’ led by leaders/influencers and in rivalry with other hubs.
Just as democracy will fall by targeting entire populations, so will public health, science, and basic decency.
/2
The irony of living in a social media society is that it’s easier than it’s ever been to directly trace the sources of influence. Social media makes social networks highly visible and traceable.
I’ve shared this before here. The majority of anti-vax BS online is traceable back to 12 people. 12!
I often Tweet about the 1970s being a pivotal time in the reversing of the public gains of the we-based society, post-WW2. The period 1950-late-1970s, when ‘the public’ was the dominating principle of governance. Rebuilding broken societies.
Housing no exception.
1/5
Look at how mass home ownership only emerged with massive government-led public housing programs, post-war. And how that ownership rate flatlined and then declined with the progressive removal of public housing programs, replaced by ‘the market’.
2/5
Really just a smokescreen for the resurgence of status as the dominating principle in housing. Look at that price curve, accompanying the flatlined rate of ownership.
The same pattern of reversal of the public good as an organising principle can be found everywhere.