Dramatic waning of effectiveness of vaccines, in a public health strategy that is vaccination only. The herd of elephants in the room for our Covid ‘strategy’. UKHSA data (see link at end). Symptomatic disease first. (Experts welcome to comment!) /1 #auspol#covid19aus
This data suggests it makes little difference if you were boosted, if AZ was your first 2 shots. Effectiveness against symptomatic disease near zero after 20 weeks in both cases. This was also the vaccine given to highest risk, older Australians. /2
Pfizer followed by Pfizer booster seems even worse than no booster. A little better with Moderna booster, but remembering again many Australians are still at 2 doses of any vaccine, thanks to the previous PM’s election campaign. And 20% effectiveness either way i.e. very low. /3
Moderna fares quite a bit better, if boosted. (More on boosters in Australia in a moment.) Symptomatic disease has been consistently minimised as an issue, but significant impacts on workforce absenteeism and LongCovid are bringing attention back to it. Hospitalisations next. /4
Effectiveness against hospitalisation may be marginally better if you’re not boosted, after 6 months (but may reflect vaccination demographics - older people more likely to be boosted). A range from 60-90%, which explains significant ongoing hospitalisation numbers. /5
Even at the upper end of that range, say 90%, with enormous infection numbers/transmission, that still translates into unmanageable numbers of people needing hospital beds. Now to bring the Australian context to this data, the herd of elephants in the room. /6
About 15% of Australians have not had even 2 doses of a vaccine, let alone a booster. Only just over half of Australians have had a booster shot, and only 15% have had 2 boosters. In a National Cabinet strategy of vaccination only, we’re not even doing that. /7
Even more seriously, by October (i.e. now) even boosted people are past the range of efficacy shown in the UKHSA data, which is 20 weeks. Both 2 and 3-dose Australians mostly had their final shots around April. So, what’s the plan? /8
Heading towards Christmas with existing vaccinations - our only real strategy - well past their optimum efficacy date. And many Australians significantly under-vaccinated to boot. The only mention I’ve seen of updating the vaccination strategy is talk of getting boosters…/9
…with our annual flu shots. Up to 6 or more months away. Jane Halton mentioned there’s talk of only buying enough to match how many flu shots are given annually i.e. nothing like even a majority of the population. All of this suggests Australia is about to experience…/10
…what the UK is now experiencing. Significant increases in infection and disease, including severe disease and hospitalisation, caused by waning immunity and absence of other protective measures. The initial hopium of vaccinating our way out of the pandemic could only ever…/11
…last as long as those initial vaccinations lasted. We’ve not only arrived at that point, it’s probably already behind us. /end
This extract from Will Storr's book on status is required reading if you want to understand Covid minimisers.
For 'events', let's use 'anti-lockdown crusades'. /1
"Events like these are often described as moral panics. Whilst this is surely correct in some cases, our investigation suggests an alternative possbility:
that much of their explosive energy can derive not form panic, but desire for acclaim." /2
"They happen when games suddenly find ways of generatingh out-sized volumes of status for their players.
When a rich seam is discovered, more and more individuals are attracted to the game, with a precondition for play being acceptance of its beliefs,..."
/3
“In free governments, the rulers are the servants and the people their superiors and sovereigns.” (Benjamin Franklin)
This is the American political DNA.
It’s also impossible nonsense, that is destroying the world. /1
‘Popular sovereignty’ is the system of government of modern democracies. A system of government where ‘the people’ are sovereign.
The problem with that whole idea is that it’s both a logical and physical impossibility. /2
Groups of people, of whatever size, simply don’t, and can’t, think, act or feel as a single entity. And yet this is the nonsense we hear every day, as ‘democracy’.
The idea that ‘the people’ has replaced the sovereign (King, or whatever), at the centre of societies. /3
One of the things to understand about China is that it plays ‘the long game’. In the West we’re hopelessly glued to meaningless short electoral cycles, which have degenerated into perpetual populist posturing aimed always at the next election.
China thinks much longer term. /1
It’s partly a cultural thing too, to take a long-duration view of the events in our lives.
I saw a demographer argue on the weekend that ‘we’ in the West need to take a more preventative approach to public issues, rather than reactionary. /2
Always that ‘we’ people use. The West doesn’t have a we. It had one between the end of WW2 and the late-1970s, at which point its robber barons swiftly replaced it with ‘the economy’.
The idea that we’re all just individuals interacting in markets. /3
This latest election has reinforced even more strongly for me that societies cannot be saved from election bubbles.
100% of the emotion and analysis has been either elation or despair at the relative success of the two teams, Red and Blue.
Oz is next.
/1
‘It’s the economy, stupid’ was a Bill Clinton phrase. This headline indirectly refers to it.
Has anybody stopped to contemplate what the phrase means? /2
I don’t think the economy is even a thing. But the insight behind Clinton’s phrase is mostly accurate. He was saying that the material conditions of peoples’ lives determine elections.
Under populism, political leaders attribute all election victories to themselves, as do commentators. It's a popularity bubble.
In reality, people vote mostly according to the material conditions of their lives. This is a critical distinction. 1/5
A politician who slaps themselves on the back for winning an election doesn't understand they were voted in to fix the material conditions of peoples' lives.
When they don't do that, retribution is brutal. 2/5
Voters pay almost zero attention to the details of politics, which populists don't understand.
Those details are gossip items between politicians and the people who report on them, mostly. 3/5