Dramatic waning of effectiveness of vaccines, in a public health strategy that is vaccination only. The herd of elephants in the room for our Covid ‘strategy’. UKHSA data (see link at end). Symptomatic disease first. (Experts welcome to comment!) /1 #auspol#covid19aus
This data suggests it makes little difference if you were boosted, if AZ was your first 2 shots. Effectiveness against symptomatic disease near zero after 20 weeks in both cases. This was also the vaccine given to highest risk, older Australians. /2
Pfizer followed by Pfizer booster seems even worse than no booster. A little better with Moderna booster, but remembering again many Australians are still at 2 doses of any vaccine, thanks to the previous PM’s election campaign. And 20% effectiveness either way i.e. very low. /3
Moderna fares quite a bit better, if boosted. (More on boosters in Australia in a moment.) Symptomatic disease has been consistently minimised as an issue, but significant impacts on workforce absenteeism and LongCovid are bringing attention back to it. Hospitalisations next. /4
Effectiveness against hospitalisation may be marginally better if you’re not boosted, after 6 months (but may reflect vaccination demographics - older people more likely to be boosted). A range from 60-90%, which explains significant ongoing hospitalisation numbers. /5
Even at the upper end of that range, say 90%, with enormous infection numbers/transmission, that still translates into unmanageable numbers of people needing hospital beds. Now to bring the Australian context to this data, the herd of elephants in the room. /6
About 15% of Australians have not had even 2 doses of a vaccine, let alone a booster. Only just over half of Australians have had a booster shot, and only 15% have had 2 boosters. In a National Cabinet strategy of vaccination only, we’re not even doing that. /7
Even more seriously, by October (i.e. now) even boosted people are past the range of efficacy shown in the UKHSA data, which is 20 weeks. Both 2 and 3-dose Australians mostly had their final shots around April. So, what’s the plan? /8
Heading towards Christmas with existing vaccinations - our only real strategy - well past their optimum efficacy date. And many Australians significantly under-vaccinated to boot. The only mention I’ve seen of updating the vaccination strategy is talk of getting boosters…/9
…with our annual flu shots. Up to 6 or more months away. Jane Halton mentioned there’s talk of only buying enough to match how many flu shots are given annually i.e. nothing like even a majority of the population. All of this suggests Australia is about to experience…/10
…what the UK is now experiencing. Significant increases in infection and disease, including severe disease and hospitalisation, caused by waning immunity and absence of other protective measures. The initial hopium of vaccinating our way out of the pandemic could only ever…/11
…last as long as those initial vaccinations lasted. We’ve not only arrived at that point, it’s probably already behind us. /end
Vaccination is failing because we’re misdiagnosing anti-vax as the population being more ‘hesitant’ about vaccines. The same myths we wallow in about democracy, that it’s led by ‘the people’.
All change is led. Distrust in vaccination has been led. By a very small number of mostly identifiable people. Human groups of whatever size are NEVER led by the people in the groups themselves.
/1
Societies are always networked, with hubs that represent the various social groupings, a nucleus of ‘influence’ led by leaders/influencers and in rivalry with other hubs.
Just as democracy will fall by targeting entire populations, so will public health, science, and basic decency.
/2
The irony of living in a social media society is that it’s easier than it’s ever been to directly trace the sources of influence. Social media makes social networks highly visible and traceable.
I’ve shared this before here. The majority of anti-vax BS online is traceable back to 12 people. 12!
I often Tweet about the 1970s being a pivotal time in the reversing of the public gains of the we-based society, post-WW2. The period 1950-late-1970s, when ‘the public’ was the dominating principle of governance. Rebuilding broken societies.
Housing no exception.
1/5
Look at how mass home ownership only emerged with massive government-led public housing programs, post-war. And how that ownership rate flatlined and then declined with the progressive removal of public housing programs, replaced by ‘the market’.
2/5
Really just a smokescreen for the resurgence of status as the dominating principle in housing. Look at that price curve, accompanying the flatlined rate of ownership.
The same pattern of reversal of the public good as an organising principle can be found everywhere.
This topic attracts so much interest because of the framing, lost in the noise. The framing that says human-human interaction is ‘natural’ and ‘real’, and human-machine interaction is ‘algorithmic’ and ‘fake’.
That framing falls apart with even small scrutiny.
/2
I’ve spent years here describing how much if not most human activity is actually social. It’s about people negotiating their status, in groups, against other groups.
This should ring all sorts of alarm bells about the idea of ‘natural’ human interaction.
/3
I’ve watched sport over many years, as a window into a culture we’re still not seeing or understanding.
Victory now creates utter euphoria. Defeat has professionals in tears, with crowds either silent or overwhelmed with euphoria themselves.
A culture in plain sight.
/1
Team sports culture. Kidult culture, the now entrenched imitative rivalry of competing groups or teams, not just in sport, but in every part of life.
The culture of the schoolyard. Status battles, for identity.
/2
Long gone are the days where both winner and loser shook hands politely, both smiling, celebrating a ‘good game’. Where crowds applauded both competitors.
Everything, in sport and outside it, is now resolutely ‘partisan’.
/3