Dramatic waning of effectiveness of vaccines, in a public health strategy that is vaccination only. The herd of elephants in the room for our Covid ‘strategy’. UKHSA data (see link at end). Symptomatic disease first. (Experts welcome to comment!) /1 #auspol#covid19aus
This data suggests it makes little difference if you were boosted, if AZ was your first 2 shots. Effectiveness against symptomatic disease near zero after 20 weeks in both cases. This was also the vaccine given to highest risk, older Australians. /2
Pfizer followed by Pfizer booster seems even worse than no booster. A little better with Moderna booster, but remembering again many Australians are still at 2 doses of any vaccine, thanks to the previous PM’s election campaign. And 20% effectiveness either way i.e. very low. /3
Moderna fares quite a bit better, if boosted. (More on boosters in Australia in a moment.) Symptomatic disease has been consistently minimised as an issue, but significant impacts on workforce absenteeism and LongCovid are bringing attention back to it. Hospitalisations next. /4
Effectiveness against hospitalisation may be marginally better if you’re not boosted, after 6 months (but may reflect vaccination demographics - older people more likely to be boosted). A range from 60-90%, which explains significant ongoing hospitalisation numbers. /5
Even at the upper end of that range, say 90%, with enormous infection numbers/transmission, that still translates into unmanageable numbers of people needing hospital beds. Now to bring the Australian context to this data, the herd of elephants in the room. /6
About 15% of Australians have not had even 2 doses of a vaccine, let alone a booster. Only just over half of Australians have had a booster shot, and only 15% have had 2 boosters. In a National Cabinet strategy of vaccination only, we’re not even doing that. /7
Even more seriously, by October (i.e. now) even boosted people are past the range of efficacy shown in the UKHSA data, which is 20 weeks. Both 2 and 3-dose Australians mostly had their final shots around April. So, what’s the plan? /8
Heading towards Christmas with existing vaccinations - our only real strategy - well past their optimum efficacy date. And many Australians significantly under-vaccinated to boot. The only mention I’ve seen of updating the vaccination strategy is talk of getting boosters…/9
…with our annual flu shots. Up to 6 or more months away. Jane Halton mentioned there’s talk of only buying enough to match how many flu shots are given annually i.e. nothing like even a majority of the population. All of this suggests Australia is about to experience…/10
…what the UK is now experiencing. Significant increases in infection and disease, including severe disease and hospitalisation, caused by waning immunity and absence of other protective measures. The initial hopium of vaccinating our way out of the pandemic could only ever…/11
…last as long as those initial vaccinations lasted. We’ve not only arrived at that point, it’s probably already behind us. /end
Something that seems one of those classic stories of ‘community’, people apparently making the effort to offer the community (whatever they think that means) something special.
Christmas lights. How’d that work out? /2
It worked out the way all sociality and ‘connection’ works out. Badly. Because we have not the first clue about what connection really means.
Connection creates the battles for status that I call team sports, and Will Storr calls status games. /3
The basic act of segregating children from adult life in schools caused a violent change to our societies, that we’re still living through (and not understanding).
When you put people together, they form a ‘culture’. That becomes their world.
/1
By segregating childhood off from adult life, we created places where children developed a culture of their own. School culture.
That became their world. When we then universalised schooling, that became all of our world. /2
Because when kids leave school they take their culture with them. What else would they do? It’s all they know.
And then they started transforming the adult world, into that same school culture.
/3
It’s emotionally satisfying to imagine that action against things like climate change and Covid is being blocked by a small cabal of evil [insert chosen baddies] people.
The reality is more banal, and more difficult.
/1
The ‘status quo’ is a beautiful concept, rarely used analytically. It’s a rendition of the actual reason societies hold, or don’t.
They’re a semi-stable equilibrium of competing status hierarchies.
/2
Always shifting, as human desires and their associated status hierarchies shift.
It’s extremely difficult to establish a lasting, stable status hierarchy, because of fluctuating human desires.
/3
Our ‘freedumb’ times. The cultures that have the loosest social restrictions on the planet?
Former communist and Eastern European countries. The countries we would see as ‘authoritarian’, have the lowest amount of social restrictions in play.
What’s it mean? /1
To me it shows what I often say. That societies are 100% social, never political in the way we mean the latter term.
Here’s the paradox libertarians can’t understand. It’s social restriction, that creates freedom. This isn’t even difficult to understand.
/2
Take roads. If we had no road rules or other customs around driving, if we all just went out there every day and drove however we liked, how ‘free’ would those roads be?
It’d be destructive chaos. A bit like former communist countries. That’s why they *look* ‘authoritarian’. /3
The most common assumptions about democracy, what it is or even should be, are wrong.
Democracy is not ‘the people’ running societies. That’s populism. That’s Homer’s car, the idea that ordinary people have the expertise to run a country.
/1
Democracy as we know it was never even designed to be ‘the people’ (never defined) running anything.
Their role is to select others to do that FOR them. Countries are by definition ‘top-down’ and hierarchical. We elect representatives to help operate these hierarchies. /2
Very little is different between the more feudal societies that preceded Western democracies, and democracy as we live it today.
We just added elections, to allow all of us to select who our lords will be. But they’re still lords. /3
Status runs societies, and historically that status was concentrated in families protecting their ‘line’. We still have dynasties (Murdochs, anyone?), but something in history profoundly weakened them.
It’s not what you expect, I will bet.
/1
Many of these family dynasties were maintained by inter-marriage between blood relations. Up to 10% of marriages in the world to this day are between blood relations.
What weakened this form of status hierarchy was the Catholic Church, with its campaign against incest.
/2
Joseph Heinrich, a Professor of Human Evolutionary Biology, and colleagues, have amassed amazing evidence of the impact of this breaking down of familial lines as the status hierarchies dominating societies.
This led to the rise of the now common ‘nuclear family’. /3