Look at the replies to understand why I call them The Proud Boys of Real Estate
Anyone who thinks to blame decades-in-the-making housing crisis on 1of11 Dem Socialist Supervisor who has been in office 3yrs & founded a statewide tenants advocacy org is insane, stupid or paid off.
Any honest observation is that San Francisco was sold off to Big Tech, commercial real estate & venture capitalists going back to at least Willie Brown’s administration.
And as South Bay cities were adding millions in creative office space for six-figure migrant tech workers…
SF didnt protect the affordable housing stock.
As a tenants rights atty & advocate, Dean & folk like him r the only reason it isnt worse for the remain SF low-income & working class.
Meanwhile SF’s tech engineer gentrifiers r famously NOT housing insecure. So y they so loud?
Trolls like @hollybiology r so delusional they cant just say they disagree on the path forward, they literally have to lie as part of their YIMBY pile on/circle jerk.
Everyone says they’ve never seen anything on the left as toxic as YIMBYs on Housing Twitter. There’s a reason…
B/c YIMBY is not of the left - it is famously of the right, started by anti-vacancy control, pro-Robert Moses libertarian Sonja Trauss & now funded by Big Tech, real estate & libertarian billionaires including the Koch Bros.
Dean isnt targeted b/c he is so much more powerful than other 10 SF Sups or Mayor. (The mayors seat in EVERY MAJOR 🇺🇸 CITY is pro-market rate housing, as is CA legislature & gov!)
He is targeted b/c he speaks up a/b right-wing/YIMBY effort at Urban Renewal 2.0 #gentrification
And YIMBY attacks anyone & everyone who might interfere with the YIMBY urban cleansing plan for private capital/speculation from former tenant rights attorneys/advocates, the unhoused, BIPOC, organizers, anyone.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2. Missing middle used to mean those who make too much for public housing & not enough to buy a home. Literally the equivalent today of the 50-80% AMI.
Then it came to mean moderate income (80-120% AMI).
Now it’s just less than a tech engineer wants to pay. 🤦🏾♂️
2. We’ve seen repeatedly the promise of zoning deregulation w/o affordability requirements leading to missing middle. It’s snake oil.
We saw that with small lot subdivisions in LA a decade ago. Same w/duplex laws.
Instead what we see is the new homes more often than not selling at higher price than the initial home acquisition price, & overall hikes in sq ft prices in markets where the splitting is feasible & desirable.
YIMBY not only dont give a 💩 a/b protecting tenants (& I’ll add at-risk homeowners) ur orgs oppose every effort to do something meaningful under the claim of it interfering w/the market.
Fact is YIMBY dont want vacancy control b/c u want to occupy the urban space BIPOC live in.
All of the meaningful things to protect tenants & long-time residents could be put in place by the legislature TOMORROW to create this “make it hard to displace tenants” world a reality. And yet YIMBY don’t direct their energy towards it. AND YIMBY NEVER WILL!
Stuff just as simple to pass as a blanket upzoning:
Statewide vacancy control
High flipper taxes
Tenant Opportunity to Purchase
Ellis Act repeal
Anti-harassment ordinances
Criminal penalties for habitability violations
Etc etc w/a comparatively small amount of💰 for enforcement
Oh YIMBY know how to yell. …at the elders, BIPOC & (especially on Housing Twitter) at the women who dare to point out how the blanket zoning deregulation policies lead to their eviction.
Lest we forget head YIMBY putting elders in the hospital pushing #SB827 🧵
Hard to not see that the Ca statewide ban on parking minimums #AB2097 convo is a reflection of typical shortcomings of white urbanists, and in particular their absence of understanding of equity & race, and refusal to see obvious conflicts with their urbanists dreams. 🧵
While white urbanists & politicians claim the bill advances equity, the actual anti-poverty orgs w/decades standing up for the low-income and people of color are saying different.
Here’s from the Western Center on Law & Poverty, Public Interest Law Project & CRLA Fndn:
“When AB 2097 passed the Assembly as well as Senate policy committees, it required that housing development projects of 40 or more units include affordable units in exchange for being relieved of complying with minimum parking standard…” #AB2097
And weird (but understandable) to see Garcetti carrying our flag.
#AB2097 eliminates the lone (paltry, flawed but better than nothing) optional inclusionary zoning policy (around transit stops) that exists for the 99% of CA cities.
Calling this a win for equity is insulting.
This is the result of a well-funded campaign to deregulate housing development & thereby ANY POSSIBLE LEVERAGE locals have to push speculative/for-profit market-rate developers to be slightly responsive to the current need for affordable & mod-income housing.
Won't someone do something a/b those NIMBYs at the Federal Reserve? They've done it again! 🙃
Zoning is & always has been a red herring. Wall Street determines when, where, how & what type of housing gets built. Been this way for 40+ years. #YIMBY