Obama in 2009: We need children to eat healthier in schools.
DOD in 2009: If we don't address childhood obesity, we won't be able to maintain our military readiness.
GOP "Fuck you!"
GOP in 2022: "Why are #recruiters having such problems finding 18 year olds who are qualified?"
For those wondering what I mean, let me explain:
Every June, recruiters get a list of the next years high school seniors from the counselor who didn't opt out of being contacted by recruiters.
We then have pool members from that school start marking off names.
We put a mark next to all of the females, those in special education classes, those who are physically disabled, and those who are excessively overweight.
The remaining names after that make up the QMA for that school (qualified male applicants).
The others aren't contacted.
In some cases that meant that >90% of high school seniors aren't viable applicants.
I had high schools myself were there were no applicants in the entire senior class.
And this is before we disqualify anyone for criminal activity, tattoos, or any of the 1000+ medical issues.
So before we've even found out they're anti military, anti-woke, anti-war, or had a scholarship to college - more than 70% of them were eliminated for being anti-salad before the school year ever started.
Recruiters are effectively competing with college sports at this point.
So no, we don't have an applicant problem. Recruiters are still getting their appointments, still meeting their canvassing numbers, and still getting people coming through the doors of their officers.
We have an enlistment problem. There's not enough QUALIFIED applicants.
note 1: I was a Marine Corps recruiter, and a RSS Non-commissioned Officer in Charge, meaning I ran operations for my area.
Army/AF/USN recruiters may not have done things the same way as we did, especially IRT female contacts.
We didn't actively recruit females. They might.
*offices.
Why? Well, the answer is pretty straightforward: The Marine Corps only has one female training battalion, only so many racks in those barracks, and we never having trouble filling those spaces at boot camp.
The only exception is if they could play a level 4 solo on the clarinet.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So on the way home from helping my GF's aunt with some electrical work, we were rear ended at a light.
No injuries, cosmetic damage to my car, none to his (he was very apologetic and professional, as was the NC state trooper that stopped)
I'm curious.
Would you feel a claim?
Basic details:
We stopped at the red light, he was behind us, the car at the front of the line went, but the jeep in front of us didn't. The driver behind us saw the 1st car go, and proceeded to drive into the back of us.
The state trooper pulled up having seen us pulled over on the side of the road, asked us if we were okay (me, my GF, him, and his son), and then followed us to the gas station before leaving us to exchange info.
Remember: Trump's legal team DEMANDED this response.
The DOJ was forced to reply to his "special master" request - and boy did they. They eviscerated him. They destroyed his legal "arguments" and they showed America a small subset of America's secrets he stole.
If anyone ever found these documents unsecured, meaning "not in a vault in a SCIF, or at DNI approved workstation or workspace", the entire facility would be locked down, everyone in the building at the time would surrender their devices and sign an Art 31 statement.
And if you were the ISSO or ISM of ANY facility where classified documents were discovered like this on Monday night, I'll guarantee by Friday you won't be.
In fact, you'd be lucky if you weren't incarcerated by Tuesday morning.
I'm torn on this assessment, particularly the part about your curriculum is at fault if you can't teach it in 40 minutes or less 3-5 days a week. It doesn't work for every subject, nor every student. But should homework be tabulated in grades? I think no. It should be test prep.
On one hand, let's be honest: in a 50 minute class, you may have 40 minutes of actual learning time, with the first 5 minutes spent w/ students powering on laptops or opening books, and the last 5 w/ them thinking about getting to their next class. 20% of class time is lost.
but on the other hand, you run into the dilemma where EVERY teacher thinks that they're the only teacher giving homework, so they pile it on.
So instead of 1-2 hours of homework, you end up with 4-6.
That fact + ADHD = I was usually up till 3 am writing reports at 14 years old
If Dems do manage to end the #filibuster, and then NOTHING is passed afterwards, will you vote for Dems in the midterms?
And if you hesitated for even a second before saying yes, then that's exactly why Dems won't end the filibuster.
Because if Dems end the filibuster, then their voters need to come out no matter what is blocked by senate procedure, stripped by the parliamentarian, etc.
What do I mean "if nothing is passed?"
Because there are a LOT of ways to prevent legislation from passing that aren't the filibuster.
The filibuster is the easiest to defeat, just need 60 votes.
By saying "abortion isn't enumerated in the Constitution", Alito is making the 10th amendment argument, sidestepping the "when does life begin?" issue altogether.
But because of that, since codifying abortion into law would not change its lack of enumeration...
it would be challenged by any state with a ban (TX), quickly sail through the district court (stacked w/ Trump appointed Rs), enjoined by the circuit court (stacked w/Trump appointed Rs) and end up where? Right back in Alito's lap because he oversees the 5th circuit.
The reason abortion was never in direct danger by SCOTUS was because up until 2017, the Republicans never controlled a district/circuit/SCOTUS combo where they also had the state legislature/governor
So any time they'd try this insanity, it'd get squashed before SCOTUS.