Having finished it, one of my big takeaways is that Savarkar--a major early articulator of Hindutva--embraced religiously-focused violence, as a virtuous activity for Hindus, again and again.
Savarkar's views on violence went far back. For example, in the early 1900s, Savarkar and Mahatma Gandhi discussed the Ramayana and Gita, two Hindu texts.
Gandhi saw the violence in both as metaphors. Savarkar saw it as real and a justification for more Hindu-enacted violence.
In fact, Savarkar saw Hindus as the original colonizers of India, in a sort of mythological blow-up of the theory of Aryan invasions (a theory at the time).
Here's the kicker -- For Savarkar, this early Hindu colonization was a good thing, to be celebrated.
Savarkar was big on mythology as history. As Chaturvedi puts it, he embraced conjecture in writing about the past. He also sought a history of inspirational Hindu heroes, often defined as such by their violence.
Consider this passage, in which Savarkar represents himself as following the example of Shivaji (a 17th-century ruler in central India) in targeting mosques --
Savarkar argued for “super-savage cruelty” against enemies, saying this was "the holiest duty" exemplified by“[G]ods and god-like emperors."
One example he gave was Narasimha, a Vishnu avatar who demonstrated “merciless valour” by “tearing open the entrails of Hiranyakashipu.”
Savarkar favored the use of violence against many enemies, especially Muslims. For example, in the same month as Kristallnacht, he said:
“If we Hindus grow stronger in time these Moslem friends of the league type will have to play the part of German-Jews”
Indeed, Savarkar was a tad cozy with Nazis. They published approvingly about one another (e.g., in 1938). Savarkar gave an address in 1939 at a Hindu nationalist political meeting described as his "Mein Kampf."
Savarkar's life was also shaped by violence. He was tried for two murder conspiracies, and convicted for one (and widely believed to be involved in the other, which led to him being largely shunned in later years).
There is far more to say about Savarkar and his Hindu nationalist embrace of violence. Dr. Chaturvedi has laid it all out for us. For those who want more --
Folks are arguing about whether there was "Hindu religion" during Chola rule (a medieval south Indian dynasty).
Buckle-up folks, it gets complicated, fast.
Key issues here include terms, the definition of religion, the Hindutva obsession with origins, and more.
Starting point -- It really depends on how you define "Hindu" and "Hinduism," both of which are originally etic terms. There is no Sanskrit equivalent of the Perso-Arabic "Hindu".
If we could go back in time, and ask Rajaraja I, in Tamil: Are you Hindu? He wouldn't understand the question. He certainly never identified himself this way.
But talking about religions and identity is often about more than specific terms.
Hindu nationalism may be on the rise in New Jersey. Here's why.
This piece highlights how much our elected officials have to learn about #Hindutva (Hindu nationalism), a pernicious form of hate that threatens progressive, inclusive values.
One thing that this article makes clear is this -- The defense of virile Hindutva in New Jersey rests on the argument that Hindu nationalism is Hinduism.
That's factually incorrect. More to the point for our politicians, perhaps, it is deeply offensive to many Hindus.
Consider this -- How many politicians would feel comfortable reducing Christianity to white Christian nationalism? I won't even give the equivalent for Islam because to do would be Islamophobia.
This is no different for Hinduism, a broad-based religious tradition.
Educational moment on a #Hindutva group: the Infinity Foundation.
For those just joining, I am going through the five groups mentioned in a recent Democratic committee resolution in NJ against far-right Hindu nationalism.
Buckle-up and let's learn about right-wing hate.
The Infinity Foundation was founded in the 1990s. It is a Hindu nationalist organization, aligning in objectives and methods with the global Hindutva movement, a far-right movement that many academics consider fascist.
Many Hindu nationalist groups have a specific focus. The Infinity Foundation attacks academics.
In fact, the Infinity Foundation has the dishonor of being one of the most frequent sources of Hindutva attacks on US scholars over the last 30 years.
Educational moment on Hindutva (Hindu nationalist) groups in the US -- Today focusing on the VHPA.
The VHPA is one of five Hindu nationalist groups named as such in a recent resolution by a local Democratic council in New Jersey.
Some history on this Hindu nationalist group:
Standard notes --
I'm a historian; I've been engaged in a research project on the US-based Hindu Right for close to 2 years.
Hindutva is not Hinduism (and it is offensive to conflate the two).
Hindutva is a political ideology, a rather hateful and right-wing one.
The VHPA (Vishwa Hindu Parishad - America) was founded in the US in 1970 by four RSS members.
Recall that the RSS is a violent paramilitary group in India; their most famous contribution to history is that an RSS man assassinated Mahatma Gandhi in 1948.
There's some discussion at present of Sewa International, a Hindu nationalist group within the service wing of the RSS's family of Hindutva organizations.
A short 🧵 reviewing the basics of Sewa International #Hindutva
There are lots of Hindu nationalist groups, both in India and overseas. The RSS (a paramilitary group) is at the center, with other groups often focusing (VHP / VHPA on religious issues, BJP / OFBJP on politics, etc.).
Sewa is a key international group in the service branch.
Here's a paragraph from a forthcoming publication of mine (peer-reviewed), that succinctly describes Sewa International --
It is an offshoot of the HSS (i.e., the RSS overseas).
It serves Hindutva (Hindu nationalist) ends.
So many more folks in the US and the UK are learning about Hindu nationalism over the last several weeks, thanks to great coverage by the BBC, NYTimes, Guardian, and others.
That's a silver lining but on a very dark cloud of anti-minority hate, pushed by Hindu nationalists.
Right now, in response to rather mild attention to their US-based activities, far-right Hindu nationalist groups are falling back on their usual tactics of intimidation, indignation, and propaganda.
This serves several purposes. The intimidation often works. Also...
Hindutva temper tantrums aim to distract.
So long as we are talking about who is screaming among the Hindu Right, we're not talking about the religious minorities -- especially Indian Muslims -- that are threatened by Hindu nationalist aggressions.