“Politics stops at water’s edge” is a famous saying in 🇺🇸 foreign policy. Clearly this is NOT a principle for SYRIZA.
They are deliberately misrepresenting the NDAA and hoping to mislead a Greek public that isn’t familiar with the nuances of the American legislative process.
They are also tragically regurgitating Turkish talking points by assigning responsibility for the #NoJetsForTurkey campaign to the Mitsotakis government. #Nonsense.
This campaign-which incidentally had a counterpart during their tenure in government-was and is driven by
This alliance - NOT the Tsipras government - launched the anti-F35 efforts in 2018. This alliance - NOT the 🇬🇷 government - is leading the efforts now.
If SYRIZA wants to cheer against this alliance so be it. Maybe the pro-Castro crowd they appear to adore can be their ally on this side of the Atlantic.
Just like like SYRIZA’s opposition to the MDCA, their critique here does not reflect how Congress works.
We can clear up whether this is deliberate or a failure on the party’s part to understand the #NoJetsForTurkey campaign: @TasouliAlexia is willing to host a conversation between me and whoever their “expert” on this campaign and Congress is.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Long overdue recognition of the #ArmenianGenocide is in sight. The memory of those lost to this genocide were dishonored by the stubborn and immoral refusal of the @WhiteHouse & @StateDept to recognize this crime. But as @ANCA_DC points out, this is not merely about the “past”.
If we are ever going to be serious about “Never Again”, we have to acknowledge what happened in the first place. As @DavidHarrisAJC and @AJCGlobal have long pointed out, punishment of the Turkish perpetrators of the Armenian Genocide might have affected Hitler.
And as @USCIRF detailed this week, Turkey carries on the legacy of genocide today by oppressing its religious minorities - including the Armenian, Greek and Assyrian communities against which it perpetrated genocides a century ago👇
When I studied in the U.K., I enjoyed hearing people refrain from calling b.s. on specious arguments and analyses and using the epithet “rubbish” instead.
This analysis by @FT qualifies as “rubbish”. Let’s count the reasons why:
1. Let’s start with the overly simplistic premise of the whole analysis, the alleged “Dash for Gas”. @FT should have just asked @ntsafos to turn this tweet thread👇 into an opinion, because what its team produced falls into the “neat, simple, and mostly wrong” category
2. The description of the situation in the #Aegean is thoroughly disingenuous. “The Turkish coastline is dotted with Greek islands”? How about the Aegean is dotted with Greek islands? And is not simply a matter of Greece believing that these islands have territorial rights,
Some describe the 46 year occupation of #Cyprus as a “Frozen Conflict” but that is neither an accurate nor an honest description.
Cyprus’ occupation is an ongoing crime, a crime in which too many have served as accomplices of #Turkey.
Today, we do not simply “commemorate” a historic event - we bear witness to one of the longest standing war crimes (and one of the longest standing issues before the @UN Security Council: a sovereign member of the UN (and EU member) remains occupied and forcibly divided.
Many may think, “So what? Why does this Greco-Turkish tension matter to me?”
For those astonished by #Turkey’s treachery on matters like the S400s or ISIS, five decades of appeasement by @StateDepartment on #Cyprus convinced Ankara that Washington would not hold it accountable.