Jennie Hodgers, an Irish woman who emigrated to the US in 1859 is believed to be the first woman to cast a vote for a US President. Jennie achieved this by posing as a man in order to avail of employment not available to women at the time. irishtimes.com/opinion/when-j…
Some have speculated that Jennie was a trans identified female, i.e. she felt herself to be more of a man than a woman. Others believe she simply used her male persona as a passport to access, successfully, more opportunities.
One thing is certain, however. She was born female.
She wasn't "assigned female at birth" as @RyanTubridyShow described it on his show.
What is wrong with saying "born female"?
It is the fact she was female, was a woman, that makes her life story all the more interesting and fascinating.
From 11.37 rte.ie/radio/radio1/r…
If you are tired of gender non-conforming women who broke social barriers and the constraints of their sex, like our namesake Countess Markievicz, being appropriated by the trans train then please let RTE know.
Email: info@rte.ie Phone: 012083111/012083434
We are thrilled to announce that the word "woman" will not be removed from our Maternity Protection Act 1994. The Work Life Balance and Miscellaneous Provisions Bill 2022 has been amended, and the word "woman" has been reinstated. #ThesesWordsBelongToUs data.oireachtas.ie/ie/oireachtas/…
When we launched our campaign #TheseWordsBelongToUs to defend the word "woman" we were contacted, and supported by so many women who felt deeply how unjust it was to erase us from legislation that pertains to women, and only women. #TheseWordsBelongToUs
However, The Work Life Balance and Miscellaneous Provisions Bill 2022 still removes section 7(2) from our Maternity Protection Act 1994: 7(2) References in this Part to an employee are references to a female employee only. The words "He and "his" will be included.
“Labour Party leader and chair of the gender committee Ivana Bacik gave her backing to keeping the word “woman” in the laws that cover maternity rights in Ireland” from @irishexaminer
While this is of course welcomed Bacik said on sport, “There has to be compromise” and favours a “case by case” approach. What this means is some males should be able to compete in female sports. @runthinkwrite has written extensively about the issues with “case by case basis”
“Suppose you have a case by case policy. If it is at all effective, it must exclude some TW... It would do so by applying a test to TW...that it didn't apply to females.”
“You either accept peoples gender ID as the determining factor, or you don't...”
The substantive matter which has not been addressed yet is this: can a school in Ireland fire a teacher for refusing to comply with gender ideology? It matters not what the religious beliefs of the teacher or school are, the point is the teacher does not agree w/ the new religion
Second, the social transition of children with or without parental consent is far from harmless, it is a therapeutic intervention, it can lead to requests for hormones (medical transition) and it is the affirmation of something that is objectively, scientifically impossible.
Third, the co-morbidity of mental health distress and disorder that accompanies opposite-sex ideation gets swept aside by the so-called silver bullet of transition, much to the detriment of the child and their care and safeguarding. All these issues legal and ethical must be
Hugely important and significant piece in today's @IrishTimes by Michael McDowell, former Attorney General, Tánaiste, Minister for Justice, currently serving as a Senator and Senior Counsel, on the importance of #SexNotGender for women's equality. irishtimes.com/opinion/2022/0…
He questions "whether society or the Irish Constitution is bound by anti-discriminatory principles to regard everyone for all purposes simply as a human citizen with an innate human right to self-identify as male, female, fluid, transgender, or, indeed, non-gendered", and goes on
to say "That trans people experience rejection as a consequence of our civilisation’s social recognition and distinctions of sex and gender does not confer on them an absolute human right to erase gendered thought and language on a widespread basis."
@ibec_irl to their own delight, recently announced that it had issued new trans guidance with TENI.
In it they suggested that staff who are uncomfortable with trans identified males using female facilities should under go some sort of training. archive.ph/gkkoU
As it happens with a lot of these companies, their idea of women's rights aren't so shiny.
IBEC recently made a submission to the committee of the Work Life Balance Bill.
They are opposed to the extension of breastfeeding breaks from 6 months to 2 years,
worried about the "cost burden" to businesses.
They go on to imply women may use these breastfeeding breaks even if they are not breastfeeding, as a birth cert,
"does not establish that the employee is using paid time off for the purposes of breastfeeding."
WOMEN are being removed from our Maternity Protection Act 1994 via the Work Life Balance Bill, with the "replacement of “woman” with “person". @SenatorKeogan spoke in the Seanad about the removal of Women and female. #WeWillBeHeard#SexNotGender
The law exists in a state of flux, as do the prevailing social opinions of the people it governs. These two aspects of our shared existence act upon each other — sometimes, changes in the law affect people’s opinions — more often, legislators and government wait to see which way
the wind is blowing before making a decision.
Where this balance fails is when government and legislators are beholden, not to the prevailing, widely held opinions of the public, but to the carefully curated and concentrated views of a vocal minority who have been given powerful