All Penn State student groups have the right to invite speakers to campus and use university resources for expressive events.
(See FIRE’s Model Policy for Allocating Student Fees. TLDR: Universities must allocate them in a viewpoint-neutral manner.) /2 thefire.org/introducing-th…
We encourage students who object to McInnes’ views to use their own #1A rights to peacefully protest, listen to his message and ask tough questions during Q&A, or ignore him.
These are far better alternatives to censorship — which undercuts everyone’s expressive freedoms. /3
This evergreen piece from @WillatFIRE is as relevant as ever. /4
Make no mistake: When students call for censorship of even the most controversial views, they are asking to limit their own rights. /5
Universities should hold firm when asked to de-platform, de-fund, or otherwise censor speech on campus. We applaud Penn State for standing by its free expression policies despite immense pressure to abandon them. The First Amendment was made for these fraught moments. /6
Reminder: FIRE defends the right of controversial speakers on all sides of the aisle. /7
Every year, incoming med students across the country get their white coats and pledge to “First, do no harm.” 🩺
But this year, @umnmedschool appears to have made its incoming class pledge allegiance to a controversial set of ideologies — ones not all students may agree with. /1
The University of Minnesota Medical School’s student-authored Hippocratic Oath contained a variety of sentiments authored by a small committee of just 15 members of the class, including… /2
…a land acknowledgment, a vow to fight “white supremacy” and foster a culture of “anti-racism,” and a promise to “honor all Indigenous ways of healing that have been historically marginalized by Western medicine.” /3
Today, FIRE and @CollegeInsights released the third annual College Free Speech Rankings, ranking the speech climates of more than 200 of America’s largest and most prestigious campuses from top (@UChicago 👍) to bottom (@Columbia 👎). /1
This is the largest survey on student free expression ever conducted, adding almost 45,000 voices to the national conversation about campus speech freedom and … 𝗪𝗘 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗖𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗘𝗗. /2
Our report finds that many of those college voices surveyed are afraid to speak out on campus. /3
Today, we sued on behalf of a University of South Florida professor, student, and student group. The suit challenges politicians' attempt to prohibit certain discussions of race and sex in higher ed.
We must protect professors' ability to teach and students’ ability to learn.
Sam Rechek doesn't want the government to dictate what conversations can happen in college classes.
That’s why he’s fighting censorship with a lawsuit against Florida’s unconstitutional Stop WOKE Act.
Today, FIRE called on the Judge Rotenberg Educational Center to drop its threat of litigation against NeuroClastic, a small non-profit that advocates for autistic people, after it published research criticizing the center’s use of electric-shock devices on autistic people. /1
“I was terrified when I got a letter from the Judge Rotenberg Center’s most notorious lawyer,” said NeuroClastic founder and CEO Terra Vance. “But the autistic people at the Judge Rotenberg Center cannot defend themselves — so we will.” /2
In our letter to the Rotenberg Center we make clear that its threatened defamation claims against NeuroClastic are meritless. /3
DEI initiatives are trending in higher ed as universities debate how to best serve their students. But what if faculty were told there’s a certain way they 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 to talk about, teach, and promote DEI — or else? It’s happening now @uoregon. 🧵 /1
FIRE is calling on the University of Oregon to stop requiring current and prospective faculty to submit statements endorsing and demonstrating how they’ve advanced the university’s narrow, politicized conception of “diversity, equity, and inclusion.” /2
UO is “committed to antiracism and other forms of anti-oppression” — but the First Amendment protects faculty from being forced to to promote any political framework — whether its anti-communism, individualism, patriotism ... or, yes, DEI. /3
With Roe overturned, some states are rushing to criminalize not only abortion — but 𝗧𝗔𝗟𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚 about abortion.
Here’s what you need to know. 🧵
2/ Legislators in South Carolina wasted no time introducing a bill that would make it a 𝗙𝗘𝗟𝗢𝗡𝗬 to “knowingly or intentionally aid, abet, or conspire” with another person to obtain an abortion.
3/ In other words, sharing information about obtaining an abortion — even, seemingly, a legal abortion in another state — with the knowledge that such information might be put to use 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐛𝐞 𝐞𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥.