As I explained at #MapCamp ... the majority of Western executive functions are operating in landscape they do not understand. They are relying on the "market" as a substitute for awareness ->
This problem is common across finance, retail, defence, agriculture, construction, healthcare, energy and almost every industry I have looked into.
The only landscapes we have a good handle on are territorial such as the theatre of air, sea, land and space which are related to territorial sovereignty.
When it comes to economic, political, cultural and digital sovereignty then we have poor awareness of their theatres ...
i.e. landscapes of both physical and digital supply chains exist but we have very poor awareness of this. At best we have bill of materials and vendor lists which is the equivalent of knowing how many trees and farms exist in the UK and a list of farmers and tree surgeons.
If I said to a General, "here is a count of trees and farms plus a list of farmers and tree surgeons .. go plan our defence" then I'm pretty sure they'd ask for a map of the landscape. We have none in physical and digital supply chains. No maps, no radars, no situation rooms etc.
Instead, we have a lot of outrageously confident people making significant decisions in landscapes they do not understand nor are aware of whilst invoking the power of a mythical "market" that will solve all our problems. This isn't just a Government problem, it's rife.
I don't care about private companies being led by the blind and regularly going under ... that's fine, that's commonplace and someone else will replace them.
Unfortunately, you can't afford to do this with Government nor with the Military which is why I'd like to see ...
... a complete ban on the use of management consultants or "business" people across all Military and Government functions including healthcare.
In general they do not provide any experience or situational awareness of value.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ah, the Telegraph has got the order to soften people up for more austerity, A new reason but always with the same result and "hard choices". They'll hoodwink a bunch of people along with the faithful into supporting it ... "we have to make cuts" etc ->
The shifting of the narrative from "we're going to need to cut costs in order to be competitive" to "we're going to need to cut costs because of brexit" ... it'll be just cover for more austerity.
Well, we voted for these neoliberals. They will deliver -
335,000 dead from austerity between 2010 and 2019 ... jech.bmj.com/content/jech/e… ... plus a disporportionate amount from poverty with covid. Must be close to 0.5M poor by now. Cost of living crisis will probably give that number a boost this winter. Well, we voted for this.
X : Thoughts on Biden's strategy with China?
Me : This - whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl… - I haven't read yet. I wrote a report on US vs China back in 2015/16. I concluded there was stuff to be done but this is 7 years later and we're only talking about a strategy ...
... I'll read Biden's strategy but the battle for decades has not been over territorial sovereignty (theatres of land, air, sea and space) but economic and technological sovereignty over theatres of both physical and digital supply chains, and the West ... we suck at awareness.
X : Is wardley mapping a model, a framework or a tool?
Me : Hmmm ... to me, it's something that I find useful. I suppose it's a bit of all, an imperfect model which includes some frameworks and tools. What drives me is whether I find it useful or not.
X : Why do you find it useful?
Me : A common language to understand a space combined with a mechanism to challenge assumptions. It's the challenging assumptions that I find most useful.
X : Doesn't mapping reinforce assumptions?
Me : I find it helps expose them ...
Me : ... of course, the danger is that someone starts to believe that the map is "right" which is why so much effort goes into explaining how the map is "imperfect" because all maps are imperfect representations, that have to be, in order to be useful.
X : Can you describe #mapcamp this year?
Me : In a tweet? I started with a hypothesis on awareness, I watched a day of presentations point to a lack of executive awareness and it finished with @CatSwetel saying that if we are to have any hope we need to improve awareness.
X : What did you learn at #mapcamp
Me : In a tweet? That's not possible. Huge amounts from library science to economic theory to brazil nut production in the Amazonia to team organisation to sustainability and different models of exclusion to ... we, will be here a long time.
It will take me months to go through and digest all the stuff ... I've only seen a 1/3 of the talks and I do need (and want) to watch those again.
#mapcamp isn't like a vendorfest conference where I spend most of my time falling asleep and never want to hear the speakers again.
X : What is the standard notation for a Wardley Map?
Me : That is evolving, as it should. There will be different notations. In the near future, as the foundation forms then the foundation will decide what the standard notation is.
X : Foundation?
Me : Speak with @spurkis
X : Who can be involved in the foundation?
Me : Anyone. It's a volunteer led group. Speak with @spurkis who leads it. There are two things the foundation needs ... funding and volunteers. It will form as an entity when it has enough of both.
What's the next wave of neoliberal exclusion ... Tobey gets the topic started with some definitions #mapcamp ... looking forward to this.
Love it ... Vikesh gets into challenging assumption and uses a map to do it. #mapcamp
Now we're into exploring the retail market and @jdcarlston is brought into the equation. Now we're onto the different forms of exclusions. Oh, I'm enjoying this #mapcamp