OpIndia is notorious for publishing toxic content like this. Now the Guardian is having to appeal to them to end their public attacks on a respected Guardian reporter.
If you work in advertising, today would be a good day to exclude Opindia.com from your online ads:
"Spreading hatred against Muslims within the majority community is what was happening there... I quit. I did not become a journalist to spread hatred" - ex OpIndia employee newslaundry.com/2020/01/03/fak…
Given OpIndia's toxic track record, it's no surprise that so many brands have already taken action to exclude them from their advertising. More background here: newslaundry.com/2020/06/23/opi…
"One of the OpIndia articles cited [a] researcher from the Henry Jackson Society, who told GB News that several Hindu families had left Leicester due to threats of violence from Muslims... Police... were unaware of any reports of families having to leave" bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-tre…
The BBC found that *half* of all tweets about the disturbances in Leicester were from accounts geolocated in India - along with "classic signs" of "inauthentic activity" - i.e. "that individuals are deliberately using multiple accounts to push a narrative" bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-tre…
"engagement patterns for the hashtag #HindusUnderAttackinUK strongly suggest the use of coordinated networks and bot accounts with a large proportion simply retweeting, a common sign of network manipulation" isdglobal.org/digital_dispat…
"Online activity was driven by influential accounts, bot-powered networks, and fabricated content... Many of the low-grade accounts in the networks (often used primarily for retweeting content) also contained pro-Russian content" valent-projects.com/news-insights/…
"Iranian State-backed channel Press TV... sent one of their UK-based journalists to Leicester. His reports claimed that a "shroud of terror has descended onto the streets of Leicester" ...and that "British Muslims are fending off Hindu extremist attacks"" isdglobal.org/digital_dispat…
Martin Luther King wrote that "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere... Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly". This is all the more true in an age when hate & misinformation narratives can travel so quickly around the world: africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/L…
Islamophobic narratives pioneered in India are increasingly being aired by divisive media internationally - for example this Daily Mail article promoting the "love jihad" conspiracy theory: archive.ph/j4dxs
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Reading this Daily Mail headline - and the related wave of UK media coverage - you might easily get the impression that a teacher was jailed for mis-gendering his student...
Despite what the Daily Mail's headline might imply, the defendant was jailed for contempt of court, after defying a High Court order not to attend his workplace while under suspension pending the outcome of a disciplinary review: reuters.com/article/factch…
Britain urgently needs a media that informs rather than misleading us. It's no surprise that the UK press has regularly been found to be the least trusted in Europe reuters.com/article/factch…
Hi @AudibleUK - there's some more background here on the toxic Islamophobic "Love Jihad" conspiracy theory, which the Daily Mail has now been promoting: theguardian.com/world/2022/jan…
It's worth contrasting the Daily Mail's inflammatory article with the BBC's reporting of the same shocking story: bbc.co.uk/news/world-asi…
Following the appalling violent attack on author Salman Rushdie, today's Daily Mail asks "What's the difference between an Islamist fundamentalist and a trans rights extremist?", suggesting that "Where crushing free speech is concerned, they are very much on the same page"
How does the Daily Mail define "trans rights extremist"? Well, they have previously aired suggestions that Europe's largest LGBT campaign organisation, Stonewall, whose methods are entirely peaceful and legal - is a "trans extremist" group archive.ph/gZsxP
The year that #StopFundingHate launched in 2016, there were over 100 anti-migrant front pages across UK newspapers - most especially in the Sun, Daily Mail and Express. 1/
Together we've shown that when enough of us speak out, advertisers will respond - and it can make a real difference. In recent years, there's been a marked reduction in anti-migrant UK front pages. #StopFundingHate works: thedrum.com/news/2019/08/0… /2
But now the Daily Mail & other UK media have shifted towards a new target. They are repeatedly running toxic & inflammatory "clickbait" stories about trans people, and the problem is escalating. /3 pinknews.co.uk/2022/01/25/cou…
Earlier this year Stop Funding Hate was the subject of a complaint to the CIC Regulator, alleging that our work was in breach of the law and amounted to “political” activity. This allegation was wholly unfounded and we are pleased to confirm that it has not been upheld. /1
Self-evidently, #StopFundingHate’s work seeking to persuade private companies not to advertise with toxic media does not fall under the definition of “political” activity outlined in the CIC rules here: legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2005/1788…
/2
Around the world, those challenging racism and campaigning for human rights are frequently subjected to false allegations of illegality & law-breaking. While it's sad to see this happening in the UK, #StopFundingHate will not be diverted by this. /3 frontlinedefenders.org/en/violation/s…