Version 1.0.0, headline figures
Sunak - 4️⃣3️⃣% chance
Johnson - 3️⃣4️⃣% chance
Mordaunt - 1️⃣3️⃣% chance
Someone else - 2️⃣% chance
Chaos as procedure rendered invalid - 7️⃣% chance
This diagram is rather different to the ones in the past, for there are three inputs - assessing whether each of the 3 candidates who are favourites will indeed run, and then if they will actually get to the ballot of Tory members
The crux is this:
- if Johnson runs (currently .5-.5), he likely gets the 100 MP nominations, and then wins
- Sunak will almost certainly run (currently .9-.1), will get the 100 nominations, but would lose to Johnson
- Mordaunt’s chances increase markedly if Johnson does not run, but she will struggle to beat Sunak among MPs, but might fare marginally better among members
There are a few assumptions
- Regardless of what happens among MPs, Johnson will not stand aside if he makes the final two, Sunak likely won’t have to as he will win among MPs, but Mordaunt might stand aside
- No other candidate currently (Wallace, Braverman, Badenoch) is currently in with a chance - this can only really change if 1 or 2 of the frontrunners choose not to stand
- There is a chance online voting failure blows the whole thing off course
And the limitations
- This only goes as far as 28th October, and not beyond - so that Johnson wins and then is PM but has to resign due to the conclusions of the Privileges Committee is not on the diagram, but that part explains why it is currently 50-50 that he runs
- We have scant little data to work with, so this is all based on a lot of educated guess work. It is however based on the assumption that Tory MPs still maintain the idea in their heads that Boris Johnson is an electoral asset, even if actual evidence for this does not exist
As ever I will update these diagrams as the race progresses
Feedback is most welcome - but *please* don’t just go “you’re wrong” - that is not very handy! Please tell me what arrows are missing, or probabilities are wrong - then we all get a better outcome!
/ends
If you put chances of Johnson running at 1 (rather than the current .5/.5) his chance of becoming the next PM then becomes 7️⃣0️⃣%
(Oh and of course were this to happen… it’s going to kick off one hell of a fight. Imagine Johnson gets 105 public backers, declares he is running… and then the results from the 1922 show 95 MPs for Johnson. It’d be 💥)
This isn’t about what I want to happen, or what ethically should happen, but is about what could well actually happen - basically there are no value judgments in here
The Q: which MPs that could stand will get 100 nominations?
Sunak - highly likely
Johnson - possible (he’s already at 41)
Mordaunt - probably
Wallace probably doesn’t want to run - and that’d be to Sunak’s advantage
Braverman, Badenoch: unlikely to get 100
So that leaves us with 2 or 3 candidates in the MP ballot
There’s a question implicitly being asked in UK politics just now: how could Britain end up with someone so obviously ill suited to the job of Prime Minister as Liz Truss? And is she even intelligent?
I think I can partially explain it
For the record: I’ve never met Liz Truss. I have however met and worked with a bunch of notionally successful politicians in the UK and elsewhere over twenty years
One particular story starts when I was a wide eyed 22 year old, working for a MEP in Brussels
Completely by chance I met then, and continued to know and later work with, a person who would become a MP in the UK, and a rising star in their party
I am now known enough in EU rail circles to be invited to chair panels at events
However I’m currently earning ZERO from rail advocacy, so finding €125 for Thalys home from that event is tricky… and the “pay” to chair is free attendance
And to those saying “if they want your time they should pay”, the response sadly is no, not really. Organisers would find loads of people who could replace me who’d have all their costs covered by their employers in the rail industry… so it’s at my costs, or not at all.
Basically: this’d be useful #CrossBorderRail follow up. But my funding for that project is done. I can cross-subsidise some rail advocacy from other comms work I am doing. But there will be some things - like this one probably - where however useful it is, I will have to not go.