Cuddlers 2-4 hours, sitters exactly 3, touchers went into rooms for unknown period of time. Those rooms were previously inhabited by an infected baby. Infectious aerosols would still have been floating.
❌ Ventilation.
We don't know the ACH of the room each baby was in. Was it the same room even?
❌ Aerosol production. People produce more aerosols when yelling. A crying baby will produce more aerosols than a quiet baby.
This is particularly important as more cuddlers were
infected than touchers than sitters.
It should be noted that sitters are a test of far field aerosols.
❌ We also don't know if the sitters were sitting in a location that had a ventilation return grill between them and the baby. Would easily explain lack of far field
infection.
Cuddlers are a test of near field aerosols and droplets....and those subjects got the most sick. Which is typical of aerosols - this is why the UK CoVid Human Challenge declined to test aerosols.
Let's move on from that study which is cited by every IPC org.
That poll is the latest poll from September 2023. You probably would not have thought that less than a year ago, right? That's because the Covid Cautious tend to avoid crowds.
But we have a first amendment right to go and protest, or listen - as you have pointed out.
From the newspapers of the time, a masking cartoon.
Side note...I had alt text for all the pics. @elonmusk's POS app refuses to send the rest of this thread, so I am not resurrecting Alt text, as I am having to do this manually.