All this is wrong—the initial line of thinking and self-correction; wrong historically and wrong conceptually—and I aim to write a RETRO article on this soon. The main thing is that the phenomena Rosen identifies are pre-internet, and digital hyper-atomization poses a *solution*.
Teaching journalism at UNH, I saw that much scholarship in the field is turgid because it engages digital-era infrastructure but not digital culture, and is insufficiently interdisciplinary. The internet remains our best hope for beating autocracy—but not in the way most suppose.
Digital culture both supersedes and organically erodes digital infrastructure—this is #metamodernism at work—so those still grappling with the latter are ill-equipped to even enter (let alone start) a conversation about how digital *culture* will be the final arbiter of this era.
In other words, it’s not about what the internet lets people do—but how it enables them to feel and relate to themselves and others. The former is a bounded set, the latter unbounded. Looking only at the former makes the future seem inevitable; the latter, perpetually transitory.
Just yesterday, Liz Cheney, who follows this feed, echoed something I wrote years ago: Trumpism has initiated the end of the Republican Party. The question was always how dangerous things would get during the variably long period in which this happens.

It remains a key question.
Yes, of course the internet renegotiates our relationship with reality. That is banal. But that renegotiation preceded the internet, and in fact the internet operates as a quickening that hurries us *past* the growing pains of this process faster than would otherwise be the case.
The question is not, is the internet changing us, or could we have avoided that change, or how destructive will that change be, but will digital culture—chaotic as its transitions are—be *efficient* enough at hurtling us through this period of human evolution, or linger overlong.
One can get discourse on this phenomenon as easily from academia alone as one can learn about both sides of the Force by speaking only to a Jedi.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson

Oct 25
No city was burned down and no leader applauded arson. Analyses concluded the looting was largely by organized crime. I don’t know what a climate tantrum is but imagine it involves agreeing with 98% of scientists. I publicly opposed statue-toppling.

Bradley—you sound hysterical.
PS/ Bradley, understand that when you leave your far-right safe spaces you enter Adult World—where everyone knows no “city was burned down,” climate change is provably real, mass looting is something gangs of opportunistic organized criminals often pursue, and people change jobs.
PS2/ Asha needs no one to defend her, and is indeed far tougher than me. I write you, @BradleyDevlin, because for some reason you’re a follower of my feed—and therefore I can be certain you’ll see it when I dress you down like the recalcitrant child you’re working so hard to ape.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 24
(🔐) NEW at RETRO: Bothsidesism Invades Westeros: An Incredible First Season of House of the Dragon Ends with a Wet Fart

This comes from a big fan of Season 1—and its source material. But the complaint I have is one I haven’t seen anyone else write about. retrostack.substack.com/p/bothsidesism…
(PS) I’ve been watching the showrunner commentary after every episode, which I think surprises my wife (who has no interest in it). But I’m glad I did, because what Ryan Condal said after the season finale caused me to realize one big way HOTD could go off the rails in Season 2.
(PS2) My problem with how HOTD:S1 ended bears no connection whatsoever to my problem with LOTR:TROP. My problem with the latter was, uh... just about everything *except* the casting, which I thought was fine. More at RETRO’s “TV & Film” section, here (🔐): retrostack.substack.com/p/its-time-to-…
Read 6 tweets
Oct 24
L: Georgia gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams’ skin color.

R: Abrams’ skin color in the cover image of the new @politico hit-piece on her.

Foreign Policy reports Politico owner Axel Springer SE “has a decades-long record of bending journalistic ethics for right-wing causes.” Image
I’ve read the Politico hit-piece on Abrams, who’s currently down 52-44 in the “poll of polls.” The sum and substance of it is that she may have overpaid a law firm that handled a major election case for her and that she chose to work with a law firm run by someone she knows well.
There’s no scandal here. Were Stacey Abrams a white man named—just spitballing—“Donald Trump,” this situation wouldn’t breach his Top 1000 scandals. But Abrams is held to a different standard for reasons that... well, I think the Politico cover image makes it all very clear, yes?
Read 12 tweets
Oct 24
I wrote this tweet 3.5+ years ago, @mtaibbi, contra your claim that journalists only recently abandoned the term “Russiagate” you pro-Kremlin hacks have been slinging as orchestrated counter-messaging for years; and since you searched my feed for “Russiagate,” I *know* you saw it twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Remarkable how little respect you have for your readers, @taibbi. You say that journalists abandoned the term “Russiagate” once they saw that the allegations against Trump were “falling apart”—which of course they never did—then quote me using the term in March 2017, pre-Mueller.
A search of my 130,520 tweets, @taibbi, shows me using the Kremlin-ally-coopted term “Russiagate” all of *one time* after 2017—not counting two times I was directly quoting one of you Kremlin apologists. You are a fraud and a liar, and you haven’t been a journalist for years now.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 24
(🔐) NEW at RETRO: Bothsidesism Invades Westeros: An Incredible First Season of House of the Dragon Ends with a Wet Fart

I’m pretty steamed right now. I absolutely adored Season 1 of HOUSE OF THE DRAGON. And then tonight happened.

I pull no punches here. retrostack.substack.com/p/bothsidesism…
As I’ve been noting since mid-month, RETRO is celebrating its first birthday. Through Halloween, all annual subscriptions are 20% off ($40). All you have to do is click the link atop this thread to get the discount—the largest RETRO’s ever offered. Hope you’ll check out the site!
(PS) I have to say, it seems like many people were disappointed in the HOUSE OF THE DRAGON season finale—as I was, though perhaps for different reasons (see article at RETRO). What is odd is that when I bagged on THE RINGS OF POWER, unlike HOTD a horrid show, folks *flipped out*.
Read 6 tweets
Oct 23
I don’t know how it happened, but the Trump biographers who knew this for certain because of their research in 2016 and 2017 were outsold by Bob Woodward 10-to-1 despite him only coming to this conclusion now. A failure of media, or of publishing? Or both? msn.com/en-us/news/pol…
In any event, I’m glad Woodward is saying this. He won’t face any of the attacks from the left that other Trump biographers faced for years after saying this half a decade ago, but at least the arrogant major-media establishment may listen now. I mean, if they see a profit in it.
To be clear, if someone is actually a threat to democracy it requires an immediate and dramatic change not just in how they’re covered by major media but in the very philosophy undergirding that coverage. Major media should consistently position Trump as a threat to this country.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(