Ulrich Kühn Profile picture
Oct 26 10 tweets 7 min read
The global nuclear order—built on policies of nuclear deterrence, nonproliferation, and disarmament—is unjust. In our latest for @BulletinAtomic @franziskastaerk & I examine Nuclear Injustice along two axes: political & temporal. A 🧵 thebulletin.org/2022/10/nuclea… via @BulletinAtomic
Political #1: nuclear deterrence facilitates Putin's war against 🇺🇦. So far, 🇷🇺 & NATO are 'safe' behind their arsenals. All other NNWS are not. Waltz called that concept "nuclear peace". We call it Nuclear Injustice.
Political #2: nuclear nonproliferation contributed to 🇺🇦 fate. The NPT allows the P5 to have nuclear weapons. All others (except 3) committed not to pursue nukes. 🇺🇦 even gave up Soviet nukes under NPT + then became victim to one of the NPT depository states - Nuclear Injustice!
Political #3: nuclear disarmament is stuck since years. Even worse, while NPT has compliance mechanisms in place for the nonpro pillar, the NWS get a free pass because there is no mechanism in place in case of Art. VI disarmament non-compliance = Nuclear Injustice.
Temporal #1: already in the past, ethnic minorities, mostly from the Global South, had to bear the consequences of nuclear testing. See e.g. the works from @seb6philippe on 🇨🇵 nuke tests. These victims are still waiting for compensations. Nuclear Injustice.
Temporal #2: today, 🇺🇦 suffers from the unjust nuclear order and for the first time the humanitarian consequences of the stability-instability-paradox play out full scale in the very heart of Europe with millions of refugees and IDPs. Nuclear Injustice.
Temporal #3: future generations will have to live with the consequences of today's injustices, in the worst case of large-scale deterrence failure with the consequences of global nuclear fallout and winter. Nuclear Injustice basically outsources these costs to future generations.
Our article is a call to researchers, particularly NextGen, to adopt the Nuclear Injustice lense in order to expose the non-viability of the current order. Right now, the future looks like a mere repetition of the past. Let's change that!
@franziskastaerk and I will be at the @carnegienpp Nuclear Policy Conference starting tomorrow. Just get in touch and tell us your opinion about Nuclear Injustice.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ulrich Kühn

Ulrich Kühn Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrUlrichKuehn

Feb 22
We need to talk about the threat of inadvertent escalation (IE) btw Russia and NATO in an ongoing Russian invasion into Ukraine proper and/or after an illegal occupation. We need to think about possible contexts that could lead to IE and how to diminish the risk of IE. Short🧵
1: full-fledged Russian war against Ukraine will see an early employment of 🇷🇺 airforce. Fighting could see inadvertent incursions into NATO airspace (Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania) and immediate NATO escorting efforts that could be misread by 🇷🇺 pilots already under duress.
2: Certain NATO countries' possible efforts to continue sending further mil. equipment to Ukraine, perhaps via the Romanian border, could be met with direct 🇷🇺 mil. strikes at the border or perhaps even on NATO territory very close to the border.
Read 9 tweets
Mar 28, 2018
A quick thread outlining the main takeaways of my @CarnegieEndow report on "Preventing Escalation in the Baltics. A NATO Playbook" carnegieendowment.org/2018/03/28/pre… @carnegienpp @james_acton32
1/n I start from the premise that in order to preserve @NATO unity min response to #Russia, the alliance should focus on three topical areas, i.e., deterrence and assurance, resilience, and risk reduction. My recommendations are as follows:
2/n Ensuring trip wire is pulled in a conflict, US should deploy a US Army battalion, split equally among the 3 EFP deployments in the Baltics; task: continuously patrolling/monitoring borders with Russia. NATO should avoid additional large-scale force deployments to the Baltics.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(