Joeri Rogelj Profile picture
Oct 27, 2022 24 tweets 11 min read Read on X
Where are global emissions heading and where should they be going to keep #globalwarming well below 2C and 1.5C?

Today, @UNEP released the 2022 #emissionsgap report.

A look at the key messages

but caution, not much good news ahead 🧵/1
Countries’ new and updated pledges (NDCs) submitted since COP26 reduce projected global GHG emissions in 2030 by only 0.5 gigatons of CO2 equivalent (GtCO2e) compared with projections based on pledges at the time of COP26.
Some pledges result in even higher emissions /2
Countries are off track to achieve even the globally highly insufficient NDCs. Global GHG emissions in 2030 based on current policies are estimated at 58 GtCO2e. The implementation gap in 2030 between policies and NDCs is about 3 to 6 GtCO2e. /3
The emissions gap in 2030 is 15 GtCO2e annually for a 2C pathway and 23 GtCO2e for a 1.5C pathway.

This assumes full implementation of the unconditional NDCs, and is for a 66 per cent chance of staying below the stated temperature limit. /4
If, in addition, the conditional NDCs are fully implemented, each of these gaps is reduced by about 3 GtCO2e.

We do know how deeply emissions should be reduced to be on track to limit warming to 1.5C or well below 2C /5
Policies currently in place with no additional action are projected to result in global warming of 2.8C over the twenty-first century. Implementation of unconditional and conditional NDC scenarios reduce this to 2.6C and 2.4C respectively. /6
Depending on what is assumed to happen to emissions after 2030, these projections can be higher or lower by half a degree Celsius. /7
To get on track to keep warming to 1.5C, global GHG emissions in 2030 must be reduced by 45% compared to what policies currently in place deliver, and they must continue to decline rapidly after 2030, to avoid exhausting the limited remaining atmospheric carbon budget. /8
Furthermore, global GHG emissions could set a new record in 2021, rebounding fully from a short slump because of COVID lockdowns. /9
These global GHG emissions are, however, highly uneven between and within countries /10
Total and per capita emissions for major emitters in 2020 /11
Consumption-based GHG emissions per household in 2019 /12
Despite the call for countries to “revisit and strengthen” their 2030 targets, progress since COP 26 is highly inadequate.

Indeed, we see less than 1 GtCO2e improvement in NDCs since Glasgow #COP26, @COP26

Where is Egypt's leadership on this, @COP27P ? /13
G20 members are far behind in delivering on their mitigation commitments for 2030, causing an implementation gap.
In other words, in aggregate, the highly inadequate commitments are even not achieved because of a lack of effective policies /14
Globally, the NDCs are highly insufficient, and the emissions gap remains high /15
If announced net zero targets are achieved global warming could be much lower than the 2.8C implied by current policies.
However, in most cases, neither current policies nor NDCs currently trace a credible path from 2030 towards the achievement of national net-zero targets. /16
“The credibility and feasibility of the net-zero emission pledges remains very uncertain” /17
Important to remember:
Under current policies there remains a 1-in-5 chance that warming ends up beyond 3C until the end of the century, continuing to increase thereafter.
In the best of worlds with all net zero targets there is a similar chance for warming still exceeding 2C /18
Finally, very often the high cost of climate action is mentioned.
We now put these estimates in perspective and show how costs compare to baseline GDP growth and gains achieved by cleaning up the economy and avoiding climate change.
A quite compelling picture if you ask me. /19
In addition to these high level messages, the report also dives deeper into some of the transformations needed to bring GHG emissions down (Chapter 5), the potential for GHG reductions in food systems (Chapter 6) and how to transform the finance system (Chapter 7) /20
If you want to read the entire report, check it out online:
unep.org/resources/emis… /21
As every year, it was a privilege and a pleasure to contribute to this @UNEP initiative and work alongside so many impressive colleagues.
@joanna_portugal @micheldenelzen @tarynfransen @TakeshiKuramo @Kelly_Levin_ and so many others /22
Also a big thank you to the contributing authors on my chapter I was responsible for:
@JKikstra @RobinLamboll @gauravganti @CarlSchleussner @alexkoberle @shivikamittal1 @CleaSchumer /END
Just noticed, it was @schumerclea not @CleaSchumer !
Apologies to both and thanks a lot, Clea!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joeri Rogelj

Joeri Rogelj Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JoeriRogelj

Dec 5, 2023
Breaking news on #CO2 📢🔥🌍
The new @gcarbonproject emissions numbers are out with an analysis by @CarbonBrief

What do the numbers tell us?
Spoiler alert: they are quite the party pooper for prospects of global peaking 🥳💩😢 (1)
Global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and the production of cement increased yet another 1.1% since 2022, reaching their highest level yet.
36.8 billion tons of CO2 in 2023!

Total CO2 emissions that include land use increased by ca. 0.5%, a tie with the 2019 record (2) Image
Any positive news here?
Land-use CO2 emissions have been declining slightly, but not at a pace that would be consistent with pathways meeting the Paris Agreement 1.5C ambition.
And their estimates are still accompanied by large scientific uncertainty. (3) Image
Read 8 tweets
Dec 4, 2023
Two quotes by two scientists have caused a bit of confusion. 👇

I am one of them.
So let me explain what I'm referring to here. (1) @KarlMathiesen
The latest @IPCC_CH mitigation report shows different ways in which warming can be kept to (close to) 1.5°C.
See the light-blue range in the figure below which shows global GHG emissions. (2) Image
Emissions also decline for carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) individually, but to different levels. Only CO2 reaches net zero and goes net negative. (3)
Image
Image
Read 18 tweets
Nov 14, 2023
Hot off the press - new climate research 🚨🌍🔥
Will warming stop once we reach net zero CO2 emissions?

Open-access publication @FrontiersIn assessing what we know and don't know about whether warming will stop once net zero CO2 emissions are reached. /1
frontiersin.org/journals/scien…
With #NetZero targets established as key components of international and national climate policy, it becomes ever more pertinent to closely understand what reaching net-zero emissions will deliver and what it doesn't. /2

iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…
That's why we, with an international team of scientists, take a deep look at the 'zero emissions commitment' or ZEC. In other words, how much warming (or cooling) can be expected once global emissions are brought down to zero.

For various reasons, we focus our effort on CO2. /3
Read 18 tweets
Jun 14, 2023
Today, the @esabcc_eu published its advice for the @EU_Commission's #2040ClimateTarget proposal and accompanying #GreenhouseGasEmissionsBudget

Interested in how the advice was developed?
Here’s a slightly longer explainer of the underlying report

🧵

climate-advisory-board.europa.eu/reports-and-pu…
1/n
The Advisory Board recommends the EU to take up a 2040 emissions reduction target of 90–95% compared to 1990 to keep the EU’s GHG budget to within 11 to 14 Gt CO2e between 2030 and 2050. #2040ClimateTarget #GreenhouseGasEmissionsBudget

Where do these numbers come from?

2/n
To arrive at this #2040ClimateTarget advice, the @esabcc_eu implemented its earlier recommendation to the @EU_Commission to follow an approach that is systematic, transparent and guided by EU values, when preparing its EU 2040 climate target proposal. 4/n
Read 23 tweets
Jun 14, 2023
In 2021, the European Climate Law created the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change @esabcc_eu and tasked it to inform the EU’s #2040ClimateTarget and 2030-2050 greenhouse gas (GHG) budget.

Today, @esabcc_eu published its advice.
Here’s the short version 🧵1/n Image
The Advisory Board recommends the @EU_Commission to take up:

a 2040 emissions reduction target of 90–95% compared to 1990

to keep the EU’s GHG budget to within 11 to 14 Gt CO2e between 2030 and 2050.
2/n
This advice is based on an assessment of what would be both a fair and a feasible emissions reduction contribution of the EU to the global challenge of keeping warming to 1.5°C. 3/n
Read 7 tweets
Feb 7, 2022
Excellent conversation going on about how media messaging following the @IPCC_CH 1.5 report sating we have "12 years left" until [your favorite climate pandemonium term] has been a disservice to science communication, and is damaging to date 👇
(1/n) @guardian @Fridays4future
As one of the coordinating authors of the report I can only wholeheartedly agree with @bobkopp @PFriedling @theresphysics and others that this is a dangerous misrepresentation of the report's assessment and messages.

Let me explain why

(2/n)
Ironically, the "12 year left until climate catastrophe" message (with years being reduced as time passes) is wrong and damaging in two opposite ways:

misrepresentation through exaggeration and driving complacency through inaccurate messaging
(3/n)
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(