The Washington Post is reporting that "Obamacare premiums are rising 4%" based on @KFF's estimate that *benchmark Silver premiums* are increasing by around 4% in 2023 vs. 2022. 1/ washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/…
That's an important distinction, as *overall* #ACA premiums are increasing by a bit more than that (around 6.2% across 32 states + DC): 2/ acasignups.net/22/10/26/updat…
However, the reality is that for the vast majority of #ACA enrollees, premiums won't be going up by either 4% or 6.2% thanks to the premium tax credits (aka financial subsidies) provided for by the #ACA which are dramatically enhanced by the #InflationReductionAct. 3/
In fact, if you earn < 150% of the Federal Poverty Level, you're eligible for a $0-premium #SecretPlatinum plan (aka "CSR Silver"...they're branded as Silver plans but are actually the equivalent of a Platinum plan in terms of deductibles/co-pays/etc. 4/
If you earn 150 - 200% FPL, you're ALSO eligible for a #SecretPlatinum plan for no more than 2% of your income (no more than $34/mo if you're single & earn $27K/yr, or no more than $93/mo for a family of 4 earning $55.5K/yr). 5/
What if you earn MORE than 200% FPL, however? Well, thanks to #SilverLoading (aka "Premium Alignment" via @greg_fann), MILLIONS of people can get GOLD plans for *less* than Silver after subsidies are applied. In many cases they can get a FREE Gold plan. 6/ acasignups.net/21/05/15/my-si…
In fact, in 2023, according to @bjdickmayhew, over 1/3 of all HCgov subsidy-eligible enrollees could get a Gold plan for $0/month.
Many of these also eligible for the $0 #SecretPlatinum as well, but it's still a #BFD.
Anyway, I discuss this and much more at my updated 2023 #ACA Open Enrollment Period tip list. Open Enrollment has already started in Idaho & opens in other states starting Tuesday: acasignups.net/22/10/27/its-t…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨 I know I've been spamming my feed w/these fundraising links, but we only have 12 days left & the Muskening is about to commence, so yeah I'm gonna use Twitter to help raise as much for Democrats as I can before he does whatever it is he's gonna do. 1/
We desperately need to keep the #HouseBlueIn22! If the GOP takes control you’ll have racist, anti-science lunatics like MTG, Matt Gaetz & Lauren Boebert in charge. DON'T LET THAT HAPPEN.
Yes, the “horn” thing is a real question we get asked. It happened to me my first week of college at Michigan State. The girl who asked wasn’t being hateful about it, she was genuinely curious. She thought it was “cool” and was disappointed when I told her it wasn’t a thing.
YIKES! I decided to look up the origin of the myth about Jews having horns (I know it dates back to a mistranslation re. Moses coming down of Mt. Sinai and a sculpture of him by Michelangelo), but I mistyped "origin" and... 👀
ANYWAY, here's an interesting article about the origin of the "horn" myth...it turns out to be more complicated than a simple mistranslation: haaretz.com/jewish/2018-03…
Since Jerry Lee Lewis is in the news, I'm reminded that back in summer 1989 when I was an usher at Showcase Cinemas in Pontiac, Michigan, both "Batman" and "Great Balls of Fire" were in theaters at the same time. 1/
We had the films showing in theaters next to each other, and the mini-marquee in between the doors was too small to fit the full titles for both films, so I did the obvious:
1988: GOP Pennsylvania state representative Stephen Freind falsely claimed that women "secrete a certain secretion that tends to kill sperm" when they're raped.
1995: GOP North Carolina state representative Henry Aldridge claimed that when women are raped, their "juices" don't "flow" and their "body functions" don't "work" thus making it nearly impossible for them to become pregnant.
Didn't watch any of the debates tonight as my kid had a concert, but it sounds like the takeaway from the PA Sen debate will be:
--Oz wants state legislators doing pelvic exams of pregnant women
--Fetterman stumbled on fracking
Anything else?
The best political debate *format* I've ever seen (and I've only seen once) was the 1st 2006 MI Gov debate between Jennifer Granholm and Dick DeVos.
There were *no time limits* on any individual answer--but each candidate was only given 30 minutes of *total* speaking time. 1/
This meant each had to judge whether to give a simple "yes/no" or a lengthy in-the-weeds diatribe, since once the 30 min was up they couldn't say anything.
I *loved* this, since some Q's only require a simple answer while other positions can't be boiled down to a sound bite. 2/2