Regarding the awful attack on Paul Pelosi: it's important not to get ahead of verified facts. We know little yet about the suspect's circumstances & motive. That said, it's worth highlighting again more broadly the dangers of #StochasticTerrorism that I’ve long written about. 1/x
We’re in an era in which the Trump-dominated GOP has more openly accepted—and participated in—dangerous political incitement. It will cause further bloodshed. And let's be clear: There is little if any equivalent behavior from the Democratic Party. motherjones.com/politics/2022/… 2/x
The incitement Trump has long used—which is knowingly enabled by his GOP and Fox News allies—has had a grim effect. As I reported recently, new research shows that Americans have grown more accepting of political violence, foremost partisan Republicans motherjones.com/politics/2022/… 3/x
And while the public and press may be inured to it by now, are sick of it... Trump is continuing to spew rhetoric that stokes fear, anger, contempt, and hate. Right now, in campaign speeches throughout the country. Pay attention—because extremists are motherjones.com/politics/2022/… 4/x
GOP leaders especially should denounce the election lies and political incitement. There is no longer any denying the connection to bloodshed. Unfortunately, most probably won't, b/c they fear Trump or see him as the ticket to power. But they should. cnn.com/2022/10/28/pol… 5/x
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ I know many are sick of this and just want to tune him out, but many millions of Americans still back Trump—including partisan extremists who think political violence is justified. What happens when “armed citizens” patrol polling places on November 8? motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
3/ Trump’s efforts to dehumanize and breed contempt for his purported enemies increase the risk for political violence, research shows. And he has spread these tactics. Republican leaders aren't rejecting his dangerous incitement—they're now copying him motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
"12 percent of 'strong' Republicans indicated support for violence to 'return Trump to the presidency this year,' and 17 percent indicated the same to 'stop an election from being stolen.' They were also more likely to agree that 'armed citizens should patrol polling places'" 2/x
Threat assessment experts I spoke with this month told me that that they continue to see alarming levels of political extremism in threat cases, foremost driven by Trump’s rhetoric and the so-called ultra MAGA movement motherjones.com/politics/2022/… 3/x
NEW: Trump continues to escalate his dangerous incitement. My latest reporting on this disturbing pattern of behavior from the ex-president motherjones.com/politics/2022/… 1/x
Trump declares on Fox News that a top elected law enforcement official really “hates” America. At a rally, he calls the FBI “vicious monsters”—knowing a Truth Social user tried to attack FBI agents with an AR-15.
He also knows the January 6 committee is about to return to the headlines with further grim evidence of his malfeasance. As Liz Cheney just put it, Trump's rhetoric about possibly being charged represents a “direct” and “credible” threat of violence motherjones.com/politics/2022/… 3/x
NEW: Trump has spread incitement of violence throughout the GOP. Here's my latest reporting on the growing danger from one of the ex-president’s darkest legacies motherjones.com/politics/2022/…#StochasticTerrorism
The temperature has risen ever since Trump and his allies went ballistic over the seizure of highly classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, with various GOP figures helping fuel the fire. Violence experts told me they’re deeply worried about the incitement motherjones.com/politics/2022/… 2/x
What’s so insidious about 'stochastic terrorism' is that politicians engaging in this form of rhetoric give themselves cover to deny responsibility for violence that isn't specifically predictable but that is likely to come from extremist followers motherjones.com/politics/2022/… 3/x
It seems clear here that Dan Crenshaw does not actually understand what a ‘red flag’ law is. It’s not a criminal procedure—it’s a civil one. A judge determines whether to remove a gun temporarily from a person based on evidence that person poses a danger to himself and/or others
Shouldn’t a member of Congress first actually understand what a law is before taking a stand against it? @DanCrenshawTX
Politicians like @DanCrenshawTX and @GregAbbott_TX blame mental illness as the cause of mass shootings (wrong), grandstand about keeping guns away from troubled people—and then oppose a law designed to do exactly that. Kids were just massacred. End the BS. motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
NEW: What are the warning signs of a potential mass shooter?
In this @WSJ essay adapted from my new book TRIGGER POINTS, I detail eight areas that prevention experts use to assess troubled people who may be turning dangerous wsj.com/articles/how-w… 🧵 1/x
Rage targeting women is a growing factor in mass shootings, as I further document in TRIGGER POINTS. Domestic abuse, "incel" ideology and other violent misogyny and extremism are rising concerns for threat assessment experts. [🎙️: Mark Deakins] 2/x
At the FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit, I dove deep with leaders of a specialized team who do key research on shooter warning behaviors. I call them the "new mindhunters," as their profiling work is distinct from that of previous FBI agents who famously tracked serial killers. 3/x