(They were going to finish Hobart Deputy Mayor first but evidently the plan changed somewhere perhaps because the LM and DM counts were taking so long.)
This was not an opinion poll - an opinion poll is a small sample of a much greater whole that may be subject to weighting errors and random sample noise. This was a compulsory vote in which 84% of enrolled Hobart voters voted with only 5% of those declining to express a view.
This said an opinion poll on the issue if remotely well designed would also show an overwhelming no (and I suspect already has though the results of the poll that was being done were never released.)
It is indeed only one municipality, and some voters who voted No would be against aspects of the current move proposal or the timing and not necessarily permanently against the concept fullstop. But "just an opinion poll" = "only a flesh wound".
It may well be that surrounding municipalities have a very different view. If so a well designed (actual) opinion poll would demonstrate that, if conducted by a quality pollster with all results, wordings and methods transparently released.
A few things about the elector poll being restricted to Hobart.
The elector poll was conducted because the Save UTAS Campus group went through the process to get a poll on the ballot in Hobart. The bar for getting a poll on the ballot is quite low.
An elector poll does not have to relate to something in that council area. In the past we have seen a Hobart elector poll about a proposed pulp mill at the other end of the state, for example.
Threshhold is lesser of 5% of electors or 1000 electors, following a public meeting.
There was nothing in principle to prevent a "Move UTAS Campus" group setting up in surrounding councils and doing the same thing to canvass support for a move in those councils. If, that is, enough people cared and thought it was a thing worth doing,
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Kingborough, Burnie, Meander Valley all done now so seven to go. Surprising that Central Coast is one of them since that was at 50% on Wednesday and is quite small.
Exclusion order interesting here though I highly doubt anyone catches Burnet. Also, Briscoe is currently provisionally losing his councillor seat (though I think still some chance to retain, albeit difficult) #lgtas
#ResolvePM Vic (state) ALP 42 L-NP 28 Green 12 IND 12 (likely to be inflated) Others 6. My 2PP estimate if that happened on election day 61-39 to Labor but that is conservative; it could be even higher given IND issue. #springst
"In the lead-up to the 2010 state election, public polls gave the then-Labor government a similarly commanding majority, but Labor ended up losing in a surprise twist."
Not really. The 60-40 poll linked to was 20 months out from the election not 2. 2 months out it was 52-48.
Results can be as all over the place as they like but if that poll occurred the Coalition would be looking at a loss of about 11 seats and the only question would be how many went to Labor and how many went to indies.
#ResolvePM (federal) ALP 39 Lib 32 Green 10 ON 6 UAP* 2 IND 8 (may be exaggerated) others 3
My 2PP estimate 57-43 to Labor. Previous poll which came out at over 61 was an outlier.
* polls may still include them in spite of deregistration as have said they intend to run again
Report on #ResolvePM republic polling here which has 54-46 against at this rather meaningless time for polling the issue. However the question published appears to be the follow-up for initially undecided voters; what was the primary question?
In the previous Resolve republic poll the primary question was "Are you personally in favour or against Australia becoming a republic independent of the UK?" (The problem with that question being that Australia already is independent of the UK.)