COVID is killing thousands of Australians who would have otherwise lived, likely to be 20-30,000 by year's end. This fig shows that, after saving lives in 2020 (another story), once this line crossed the zero in late 2021, we were in ‘excess’ territory. 1/
Only shown to June 26, this ABS report has more recent data showing that XS deaths continue unabated abs.gov.au/statistics/hea…
We had 2,500 XS deaths in July alone. 2/
Around half of these XS deaths are formally assigned as due to COVID. Singapore data tells us that the remainder are also driven by COVID in 3 months bf death. There are no XS deaths in people who have not had COVID in the last 90 days.
We don’t have that information for Oz but likely to be similar. See also the Actuaries for a more curated view on XS deaths. But the scale & message are almost the same, 13-17% more Australians are dying this year than in previous non-COVID years. 4/
COVID continues to kill people at an extraordinary rate, even now in our lowest point we are losing 10-20 people each day who would otherwise not have died. By way of comparison we have lost 308 people this year to influenza, yet COVID deaths are over 13,000. 5/
These are preventable deaths. 2022 tells us we cannot ‘ring-fence’ the most vulnerable, nowhere near well enough anyway. It is all our responsibility to reduce transmission & save lives. Not to mention prevent acute & chronic disease in large swathes of our community. 6/
This is not to create fear. But to promote #VaccinesPLUS action. I am on a train as I write this with prob 100 others. I'm the only one with a mask despite it being strongly recommended. Why would they wear one? I suspect most have no idea of the ongoing impact of COVID. 7/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
And understand that self reporting is incredible accurate - @VirusesImmunity estimates it to be 94% in her and @PutrinoLab 's landmark biomarker work. 2/
So @PatsKarvelas is spot on with her estimate of ~400,000 with LC. In fact, it's the 9 million cases that is probably under, given serological surveys show many more have been infected that have a reported positive test - kirby.unsw.edu.au/news/june-almo… 3/end
The scale is breathtaking, as is our nonchalance towards it. Key points: (1) On track for 20-30,000 deaths more than usual in 2022 (2) COVID causing ~50%, the rest also likely COVID as in Singapore (3) Last wave our worst (4) These are true XS, ie, no 'catch up' on previous years
A national day of mourning in their honour is necessary.
And then we can reset around boosters and reducing transmission through airborne controls, testing (to iso get treatment), & judicious use of high quality masks. The continued emphasis on handwashing for COVID is bordering on ridiculous.
Grateful to Peter Shergold & his 3 colleagues for their COVID review "Fault Lines" released today. I have only just seen the report & so am not yet in a position to comment in detail. But I do love the 'dedication' & wish we were hearing more like that. 1/ independentcovidreview.com
At a glance, although there are some key conclusions I have some issue with, I do acknowledge it's impossible in a report like this to satisfy everyone. Most importantly, it's difficult not to be impressed by this list of recommendations. 2/
This is serious analysis & deserves to be treated as such. But it's not the only review we need, the central Q is too immense for that: With pandemics, how can we can we achieve as little disruption as possible while protecting our community from widespread death & disability? 3/
Imp. paper. Imprinting is not new but powerfully shown here. Means that not only does SARS-Cov-2 continue to evolve to escape protective antibodies, newer variants are less effective at generating broad-based protective antibodies, making life easier for the next variant. 1/
They conclude "Together, our results suggest herd immunity established by natural infection could hardly stop RBD (receptor binding domain) evolution & end the pandemic, & vaccine boosters using BA.5 may not provide sufficiently broad protection against emerging sub-variants 2/
This paper comes at the same time as a host of impressive recent work summarized here 3/
I’m relieved & moved by what I see of the new federal govt; vision, strength openness, empathy, respect have returned. Which makes the tolerance of COVID’s phenomenal impact, that especially targets our most vulnerable people, all the harder to reconcile. #COVI19Aus. 1/
It’s not that nothing is happening. HM Butler, a person I respect greatly, has put COVID on the agenda, the AHPPC published a strong update & it was terrific to have intervention on isolation payments. But COVID is still treated nowhere near the national emergency it is. 2/
In what was predicable & predicted, we have wave after wave of an evolving new virus of humans. Around 13 million Australians have been infected this year, now commonly re-infected, millions with a 5-10 day illness that is devastating our hospitals & wider society. 3/
A thread on easing of public health interventions. In short, debating individual public health measures is not where to start the conversation. It is not very meaningful if the overall strategy is unclear. Most importantly, how much value do we put on reducing transmission? 1/
Clearly it’s good for health to have less COVID but what about the operations of aged care, health care, business in general, retail, travel, hospitality, schools? Are more or less infected people good for their operation? 2/
If the answer is less (of course it is), what package of approaches has the best impact on reducing infections with the least disruption on a functioning society? 3/