🧵We wrote in @Salon, "The 2022 midterms are a referendum on how well America's newsrooms have conveyed the authoritarian threat to the voting public."
We called on media to urgently uplift truth & democracy with election coverage. With a week to go... 1/ salon.com/2022/10/23/med…
Things aren't going great. We outline 3 main requirements for pro-democracy election coverage: 1) make threats to democracy clear 2) protect Americans against disinformation 3) treat elections as if they are more important than the sports page
This @AP article fails all 3. 2/
To make threats to democracy clear journalists need to stop saying stuff like candidates "embrace...Trump's lies about the...election." Candidates are lying all on their own. Say so. Timidity from newsrooms is creating a nationwide permission structure to "deny" elections. 3/
To make threats to democracy clear, journalists must convey that MAGA Republicans are strategically lying - to make it harder to vote and ignore the will of the people when they lose. Or worse.
Newsrooms should consult fascism experts like @ruthbenghiat, who explains: 4/
To protect voters against disinfo, reporters must convey the strategic #BigLie effort to undermine democracy, as @DrewGriffinCNN does here. Such context is too infrequent. @AP instead quotes Big Liar Rick Scott praising a "risky" candidate. Not great. 5/
Brings us to stenography. GOP election liars rely on reporters to dutifully amplify whatever they say. Repeating disinfo & normalizing liars fails the journalist's mandate to inform the public. To protect American's against disinformation journalists can't be like @nbc here. 6/
Treat elections as if they're more important than sports. Covering who's up & down in funding trivializes what's at stake & crowds out the substantive information voters need to make decisions in their self-interest. Talk about consequences of candidate's policy proposals. 7/
Democracy is at stake in this election. Candidates who are willing to lie to voters have no place in elections and newsrooms should forcefully convey as much. We are rooting for a big pro-democracy coverage push from national media. It's never too late to #FixMediaNow. 8/
More that journalists can do:
-Celebrate election workers, so they don't remain abstracted & easy to demonize.
-Feature those working to enfranchise voters, like registration drives led by youth organizations.
-Make newsrooms a one-stop shop for voters' information needs. 9/
The @PhillyInquirer has a link to an election newsletter prominently featured on their homepage. Newsrooms can write voting how-to guides, publish editorials, opinion columns, and community sourced pieces of personal stories on democracy. Whatever it takes to uplift voting. 10/
A journalist's duty to democracy and the truth means keeping anti-democratic candidates from power by providing clear warnings to the public. Journalists will be doing our country a service by reporting from a pro-democracy stance. #FixMediaNow 11/11 salon.com/2022/10/23/med…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A🧵
Leading news orgs deceive the American people about the profound unfitness of Trump.
One way they do this is “sane-washing” the abnormal & his incoherency.
This is not journalism-it’s journalistic fraud & propaganda.
Editors of all 3 leading news orgs ran A1 stories. Giving prime real visibility. Instead of objectively reporting his pathologic incoherence. They cherry picked nuggets to report. “Musk” “efficacy commission”.
A 🧵The @nytimes is failing democracy & being run as a Trump/GOP protection racket. Editorial #FrontPage CURATION shapes narrative. What is - and isn’t prioritized - reflects opinion & bias. 1/n cc: @MarkJacob16 @ruthbenghiat @mtomasky @anatosaurus @AnandWrites @NewsJennifer
Given the breadth of PUBLIC information about corruption and impropriety this is long overdue.
Thank you @propublica for doing journalism. NYT is bitter and jealous about you receiving the Pulitzer for your heroic work.
NYT is vanishing SCOTUS corruption.
2/
@propublica .@AOC introduces substantial articles of impeachment.
NYT does not deem a New York Congressperson taking such a drastic measure #FrontPage worthy.
Is @nycscribe deciding whether such articles receiving a vote in a GOP-led House make it newsworthy? 3/
@jonathanvswan @maggieNYT @jdawsey1 @peterbakernyt @danbalz @semaforben @AsteadWH @nytimes @washingtonpost @WSJ @NBCNews @AP @CNN @CBSNews @ABC @MarkJacob16 @NewsJennifer @ElieNYC @NoLieWithBTC Trumps plan will kill and maim children AND defund public schools. There is no doubt of this.
#TrumpIsUnfit but corporate media refuses to say so. This enables and licenses Trump.
@PostGuild @NYTimesGuild have you any say in the newsroom? Is this the Fourth Estate?
ALERT: #FraudulentEuphemism
Editors’ language choices have tremendous impact on Americans understanding of our world.
Today WaPo normalizes dictatorship & makes destruction of American democracy sound sexy with: “muscular Oval Office”
1/n
@ruthbenghiat @mcopelov @Will_Bunch
This piece provides important context and “stakes” of the 2024 election. Thank you @bethreinhard
It’s unfortunate WaPo editors have softened the edges of the facts presented by their choice of euphemisms.
FYI “Post-constitutional” = dictatorship
2/ @TimothyDSnyder
@bethreinhard @TimothyDSnyder We need regular Project 2025 coverage and discussion of dictatorship and fascist movements, not soft-pedaling “violating norms of exec overreach”.
IDEA: How about a weekly Sunday deep dive A1 on Project 2025?
🧵BREAKING: Newsrooms Rush to Communicate That Trump's Felony Conviction Doesn't Matter
While many front pages prominently carried news of Trump’s guilt, our most influential newsrooms are already communicating to the public that they should not consider this a very big deal. 1/
Newsrooms can make a big deal out of, and paint as a beyond the pale scandal, anything they want. That they haven't made those choices for Trump suggests a willful desire not to. News execs are choosing to normalize Trump and downplay his disqualifying behavior. Terrifying. 2/
Would any other politician receive such framing? Consider, none of the articles had to be written at all. Each of those outlets could have chosen to use the occasion of Trump’s historic conviction to instead call for him to drop out of the race. Alas, a bizarre whitewash. 3/