@teo_leibowitz, @xin__wan, and @AustinAdams10 of Uniswap's Venture and Research arms sent a scathing thread saying that my analysis "took the cookie 🍪" on chart crime vs @Uniswap, claiming that it was wrong in every dimension.
Uniswap's team claimed that I was not counting fees in my analysis, and that @Uniswap's ETH/USDC pool was actually profitable by $150M since inception🤯
It has been over ⚠️5 days⚠️ since and they have not retracted their statements, compelling me to write this thread to prevent misinformation.
It is important to me to share the truth about the state of the DeFi world 🌎
12/
I don't mean to wax poetic in the next few tweets, but the fact that the @Uniswap team thinks it was reasonable that 💵$150M💵 in profit was made providing passive liquidity in the ETH/USDC pool is simply astounding to me🤯
13/
HFT desks with insanely fast connectivity infrastructure with armies of PhD quants competing in a market 50x the size of crypto would be happy to make half as much of that profit.
How could a passive liquidity provider with no information even come close?
14/
The confirmation bias of the @Uniswap team is clear
They believe that the realities of financial markets simply don't apply to them
They truly think that they have invented perpetual motion, a posthistory money printing machine with no alpha generation required
15/
This misinformation and lack of truth from @Uniswap has spread like a virus among venerated members of the #DeFi community who trust the Uniswap brand and who haven't dug into the data themselves.
Other naive lemmings have followed them off of the cliff, claiming that they, too, have solved the problem of financial alchemy, turning lead into gold
"Execution quality doesn't matter"
"with brownian motion assumptions, fees should be 0..."
The truth is simply this. Capital is overallocated to providing liquidity in the ETH/USDC pools.
This is not a knock on AMMs or the Uniswap team. That is just the reality of the current state of the world.
18/
I'm not pointing this out to play negative sum status games or to beat my chest and shill my own protocol.
DeFi is in an existential crisis and we as a community need to be intellectually honest to ourselves about what we've accomplished.
19/
AMMs are an amazing tool for stable swaps and for bootstrapping liquidity on long-tail assets
Rivaling CeFi technology and execution quality for highly liquid symbols is something we as a community are still trying to solve. It may not ever be possible
20/
There is simply too much capital on-chain looking for yield. This results in almost every opportunity yielding in negative risk premiums, Uniswap pools non-withstanding.
21/
There is over $70B+ of stablecoins sitting on ETH looking for productive use cases.
There are not enough productive use cases for this capital, especially in an environment where risk free rates are over 4%
22/
Switching costs for liquidity is high.
Most of the capital hasn't woken up to the stark reality that #DeFi is a teenager going through puberty confused about its own identity.
We are sitting on a blessing of capital that most of the #DeFi community is taking for granted.
23/
#DeFi is racing against time trying to convince this capital to stay.
Innovation, creativity, and real productive use cases are necessary for the ecosystem to survive.
We cannot rest on our laurels because DeFi is nowhere near a sustainable end state.
24/
A good friend of mine recently talked to me about the difference between precision and accuracy that I think encapsulates #DeFi's existential problem.
25/
Precision is the ability to hit the target.
the inflow of capital and talent into the space has been remarkable.
talented builders have gathered in the space to solve big problems that will help the world that could execute anything that it puts its minds to.
26/
Accuracy is making sure you're aiming the right target.
What problem is DeFi actually trying to solve?
In the last cycle, the world needed a growth narrative (aka unregulated casino) for a historic injection of liquidity.
27/
We as a community need to abandon the promises of financial alchemy and perpetual motion machines of the last cycle and focus on long term sustainable sources of innovation that DeFi can actually solve.
28/
I hope this can be a wakeup call to the builders of the space.
Many of us have been incredibly lucky to amass capital and build through the bear market.
Let's make sure we're aiming at the right target because we owe it to society to make it a better place.
END THREAD
29/
I want to add that this is not meant to FUD Uniswap or imply that it is not safe for retail.
Things will always be over allocated or under allocated.
I just view it as a societal good to share accurate information about the state of the world.
30/
@haydenzadams and the @Uniswap team are truly innovative and I look to them as leaders in DeFi.
I hope this message allows them to reflect on their responsibility to the DeFi community and their focus on aiming their resources in the right direction to help the world.
31/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Altcoin valuations pushed hard this year to a point where the altcoins were emitting over 250M of supply a day, more than the average daily inflow of the bitcoin ETFs
h/o @BillyDishman for the chart
2/
the altcoin markets were able to push to this irrational and obviously sustainable level due to the reflexivity of its market participants
receivers of this supply don’t sell as soon as they get the coins. They sell when they are forced to.
3/
though I expect both APT and SUI to go to zero in the longer term, I do think pairing SUI long against an APT short in anticipation of the upcoming unlock will be a great trade for a 3-4 month duration
Aptos and SUI are both move based alt L1s that are heavily marketed towards Korean retail. They both have very similar idiosyncratic exposures when it come to alts which makes it an attractive pair to hedge versus each other.
An interesting phenomenon in the chart is that APT/SUI has been up only since the launch, which is a little counterintuitive.
SUI is a newer token that currently has a 3.5x lower circulating supply (was like 10x lower at the start). Why has SUI done so poorly vs. Aptos?
Because SUI has a monthly unlock of circulating supply hitting the market, whereas Aptos hasn't unlocked a *single* token since its launch
In roughly 1 week, Aptos will unlock 25mm tokens a month to team + investors, roughly 150mm usd every single month for the next three years.
Because of this dynamic, I think APT will severely lag behind SUI on a 4 month timeline until SUI has their massive unlock as well.
We saw this exact dynamic play out earlier this year with arbitrum and optimism. As optimism approached its large unlock the arb/op pair ripped faces up 80%. Arbitrum was a new launch with no new supply for a year.
I expect this same exact dynamic to play out with APT/SUI that the market isn't pricing in yet.
another thing to keep in mind is that SUI has more TVL than Aptos
many of their developers and ecosystems are on both chains, with many stopping development on Aptos to move to Sui instead
Like I said earlier, I think you can naked short both of these and be fine on a longer term horizon.
But if you want a delta neutral trade that doesn't make you net short alt degeneracy, this is a good bet
there will probably be shenanigans with more partnership announcements and mercenaries looking to squeeze the aptos leg over the next few weeks
this is a structural trade over a longer term time frame