Artificial Lawyer is the go-to source for legal tech news. Come for the comprehensive news & updates; stay for the on-point think pieces by Richard Tromans (the founder).
Another fantastic source for legal tech news and stories. The affiliated podcast about legal innovation, LawNext, is very good too. @bobambrogi is an authority in this space.
Awesome forum for anyone interested in legal tech. So many ways to find value – discussions with fellow stakeholders; free webinars presented by experts; daily emails w/ great startup content
Articles that go many layers deep, particularly on theory & data of legal tech. Strong group of dialed-in contributors, including @lucybassli, @marclauritsen, @jaesunum, and @smuckwell.
News source geared towards in-house counsel. Legal Tech & Emerging Issues topics are particularly relevant and writers like @RobertFreedman and @lylemoran get points across effectively.
One-stop-shop for reviewing and researching legal tech solutions, tools and services (there are many!). The operators, @Nicola_Shaver and @jplink, are incredibly well-versed in this space.
Useful breakdown of the main players of legal tech. @Clevy_Law, who’s a key evangelist of legal tech and a great follow on Twitter & LinkedIn, features illuminating Q&As throughout his blog.
This Substack features great content that stretches beyond just legal tech. @R44D has also shared very useful & actionable insights about raising capital as a legal tech company.
If I’ve missed any legal tech websites or newsletters, please drop a comment below!
Needless to say, there’s a TON of great content shared elsewhere. On any given day, you can find a Twitter thread or LinkedIn post with great insights, healthy debate, etc.
When I embarked on my legal tech journey, I couldn’t find an organized breakdown of websites and newsletters. So, hopefully this is a useful resource, whether you’re a #legaltech rookie or veteran.
If you found this 🧵 helpful, please retweet and share!
If your experience ends up being similar to mine, you'll encounter gaps. Sometimes legal tech-ers miss certain considerations that are really important to users. Other times they focus on considerations that barely move the needle.