The Supreme Court has delivered it's judgement on EWS and sustained the amendment made by Parliament saying that it is Constitutionally valid. The first question that comes to mind is, under what provision is the Parliament authorised to introduce a new principle in the,
1/8
Constitution? Article 368 says that under the power of amendment, addition, variation and deletion can be made. Addition can be made to the already existing social principle, which is already accepted by the SC. There is no variation, as this (Economic) is a new principle.
2/8
There is no deletion as well.The SC itself says that social,economic reservation are different.Since these two are different,the principle of social reservation,which is the basic structure of the Constitution,has been amended and put to rest by introducing this new principle
3/8
Secondly, since a new principle is allowed to be introduced, the SC must specify the source from where Parliament derives this power. This has not been done. The Parliament serves the People. People are the masters, Parliament is the servant. Servant can only exercise the,
4/8
rights given by the Master, and nowhere have the People stated that economic principle shall be the criteria for reservation. And therefore,this is an intellectually corrupt judgement. It cannot be sustained under any circumstances. Further, the condition that those availing,
5/8
social reservation cannot avail economic reservation is infact the introduction of manusmruti by backdoor. It has consequently compartmentalised society on the basic of social and economic reservation.The constitutional principal of social mobility, which ia the basic,
6/8
Structure Of the Constitution, has not only been damaged, but also destroyed by this judgement. This judgement hits the basic structure of the Constitution, and hence cannot be sustained. As this judgement has breached the 50% limit, many social groups such as Marathas,
7/8
Gujjars, Patidars, Jats etc.will be on the streets clamoring for reservation, including OBCs for 52%. We hope that like minded people will stand against this judgement and ensure the avoidance of ensuing chaos.
#EWS आरक्षणावरती सुप्रीम कोर्टाने आज निकाल दिला.हा निकाल पाहता हा वैचारिक भ्रष्टाचार आहे असेच याबद्दल म्हणता येईल. मागच्या दाराने पुन्हा मनुस्मृती आली आहे. संविधानामध्ये नवीन तत्व घालण्याचे कुठेही प्रावधान नाही. संविधान दुरुस्त करण्याचा अधिकार आहे.हे करत असताना आर्टिकल ३६८,
१/७
असं म्हणतं की तुम्हाला addition,variation आणि deletion करता येतं. ते सुद्धा जी कलमं आधीपासून आहेत त्यामधेच. आर्टिकल १६ मध्ये सामाजिक आरक्षण देता येतं. हे सामाजिक आरक्षण आर्टिकल ३४१ आणि ३४२ नुसार यादी करून दिलं जातं. ही यादी कायमस्वरूपी आहे असं नाही. या याद्यांमध्ये include,
२/७
किंवा exclude करण्याचा अधिकार संसदेला आहे. संविधान सामाजिक तत्व मानत असताना हे नवीन आर्थिक तत्व कोणत्या आर्टिकलनुसार अंतर्भूत केलं ते सांगा. असं कोणतंही प्रावधान नाही. त्याचं काहीच स्पष्टीकरण या निर्णयात आलेलं नाही. सुप्रीम कोर्ट स्वतः म्हणतंय की, सामाजिक आरक्षण आणि आर्थिक,
३/७