Several large institutions’ equity investments in FTX were eviscerated today after FTX asked Binance the #1 crypto exchange to bail them out after they became insolvent following massive withdrawals of FTX’s crypto deposits. #XBT -11% to $18.5K. theinformation.com/articles/ftx-v…
I will continue to warn about #btc falling in the aftermath of the takeouts of FTX. #btc has no cash flows or earnings so there’s no intrinsic value. There’s no way to even put a comparable multiple of anything on it. It’s a greater fool theory asset. It’s value should be zero.
Huge difference between $TSLA and #btc: whether you agree or not, you can put a value on $TSLA based on earnings or cash flow. There’s no way to do that with #BTC. With fine art and collectibles there’s scarcity value and comparables. BTC isn’t scarce with 21M coins possible.
You #btc bulls are so funny. You can buy a 1961-D (Denver) Franklin Half Dollar in mint condition for $25. Total mintage ~21M so same scarcity as #BTC = .0026% per person in the world. And they’re 90% pure silver with silver content alone worth ~$12.50 each. Not worth $18K.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let’s give @elonmusk a break. No one should have believed the argument that he wouldn’t sell $TSLA shares again; my view (repeated frequently) was that he meant he was done selling for that 3-day tranche in Aug and that he still had some $5.4B to raise if the deal went through.
2/ The pattern of Elon’s selling the past three days fits April and August: biggest piece on the first day; smallest piece on the last day. I think he’s likely done selling for now. But don’t expect him to give that assurance because many here misinterpret his assurances.
3/ Does $TWTR need cash now? No.
As of 6/30, TWTR had $6.1B cash and $6.7B debt. YTD thru 6/30 TWTR had:
- Adv Revs $2.2B
- Subscription fees $0.2B
- Costs and OpExp $2.8B
- EBITDA $111M (2Q)
- CapExp -$320M
Before I went to WS, I was a product manager for J&J and before that with Kraft General Foods. Like PMs, advertisers hate noise, and they hate change. They won’t spend their ad budgets on $TWTR until it becomes clear how the changes @elonmusk and team are making impact ad $ ROI.
Several high profile advertisers have stopped spending on $TWTR. Others will follow - not just because of concern about perceived product adjacency, but because of the uncertainty created by turnover and the change in focus toward user fees, which may or may not impact ad $ ROI.
Let’s not confuse $TWTR customers and users. TWTR’s customers are overwhelmingly national advertisers, who paid $2.2B thru 6/30 YTD vs $195M user fees. Elon is trying to change the model but in the meantime, ad $ pay the bills and particularly the $1B/year int bill on $13B debt.
IMO, @elonmusk likely selling TSLA shares today. 1/ China price cuts were expected (came a week early) 2/ WS hasn’t cut 4Q or FY’22 ests (I estimate $+.05/share 4Q eps accretion) 3/ China price cuts have not generally impacted TSLA price before (three in the past two years).
Debate is how long after $TSLA files 10-Q does TSLA trading window lift (it appears 24 hours after 10Q filed)? If filed on Fri night b/t 530-10pm it would be stamped Mon am by SEC, but technically TSLA trading window could reopen 24 hours after the “filing time.” @Holgerdanske9
$TSLA has responded to me the trading policy shown above is “not our trading policy.” It is “an old disclosure connected with a cap raise.”
My conclusion: Today’s -1.9% decline could reflect Elon selling. The China price cut is actually accretive to 2022 EPS.
$TSLA sellers missing the big picture. Elon trying to raise more equity for TWTR deal so that he doesn’t have to sell TSLA shares at such depressed levels. Even if he can’t, a $5B sale is just 1% float. Once $TWTR deal closes next week, TSLA should recover as TWTR overhang lifts.
Three most positive comments from yesterday’s call:
- Zach projecting that FY’2022 delivery growth should be “just under 50%.”
- Zach’s comment that ex-reg credits and ex-Austin/Berlin, auto gross margin would have been nearly 30%.”
- Elon’s comment that the new $30K compact was now “the primary focus of our new vehicle development team” and “could certainly exceed production of all other vehicles combined.”
$TSLA conf call:
- Zach guided to “just under 50%”deliv growth for FY’22 - implies 4Q delivs ~450K+
- Elon: 4Q delivs “epic”
- Elon said $5B-$10B buyback likely in 2023
- Auto GM% probably weak due to ramp of Berlin/Austin
- M-$30K vols will be bigger than all models combined
2/ No reason to have X umbrella structure for all Elon bizs
- FSD release by end of FY’22 but wouldn’t commit to L4/L5 or timeline for reg approval
- 4680 ramp 300% QoQ and tracking at 1K cars/week
- Elon thinks $TSLA market cap could exceed $AAPL/Aramco combined ($4T).
3/ $TSLA -5% AH but mgmt very confident about 4Q delivs
WS FY’22 EPS $4.32 could fall 2-3% tomorrow - 4Q vols up/GM % down.
With no talk on CC about whether Elon has to sell more TSLA shares, $TWTR overhang persists.
OTOH, $TSLA very washed out past 3 wks (-22% vs -3% NDX)
$TSLA beat slightly on Adj EPS ($1.05 vs $1.02 WS and vs my $1.09), but missed on auto gross margin ex-RC (26.8% vs 27.7% WS). While they guided to 50% avg multi-year delivery growth, they didn’t speak to 4Q delivery growth. No buyback in release. Conf call 530 ET.
2/ $TSLA missed on Revs $21.5B vs $22.0B WS. $1.05 Adj EPS beat the $1.02 Adj EPS est because of low tax rate (8.3% vs my 15.0% est) and by leveraging SGA ($961M flat vs 3Q; I exp a +25% incr). Reg credits were light ($286M vs my $300M est). Shorts will argue low quality beat.
3/ Positives: 1) $3.3B free cash flow after all capexp; 2) $21.1B cash at qtr end and no debt; 3) Operating margin 17.2% vs 14.6% in 2Q; 4) Energy profits $104M vs my $60M est. 5) Very low FD share expansion between 2Q and 3Q