At a Sept. 6, 2022 city council meeting, when the floor was open for public comments, Mayor Monique Owens abused her power as the presiding officer by shouting down and cutting off critics.
You can watch some of Owens’s unconstitutional highlights below 👀 /2
Mayor Owens repeatedly interrupts and shouts down two constituents who stood at the podium to express their support for Councilman Harvey Curley, who has been involved in an ongoing dispute with the Mayor. /3
Eastpointer Mary Hall-Rayford explains, “Mayor Owens may not want to hear our feedback, but we have the right to speak up.”
FIRE will make sure that Owens and other mayors tempted to abuse their authority get the message that the #1A trumps their egos. /4
/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
FIRE is concerned by the recent spike in students disrupting campus events, including last night’s student-organized speaking engagement at @Cornell featuring conservative pundit @AnnCoulter. /1
Video shows students playing circus music and screaming at Coulter, with one student yelling, “We don’t want you to speak here. Your words are violence. They’re threats. You cannot be speaking here.” /2
We condemn those students’ actions.
Shouting down speakers and disrupting scheduled events is not free speech or peaceful protest — it’s an impermissible “heckler’s veto.” /3
"Criticism targets 𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘢𝘴 for elimination, avoiding ad hominem attacks; canceling targets 𝘪𝘯𝘥𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘶𝘢𝘭𝘴 for elimination, seeking to destroy the reputations and livelihoods of those it attacks. " - @jon_rauch
"Censoring words and ideas because they are hateful gives them far more power than allowing them to be aired in the marketplace of ideas." - @samk_harris
In March, after pro-Russian messages were found on a bulletin board on campus and reported to the university’s bias reporting system, @SyracuseU launched an investigation and described the messages as “graffiti.” /1
The messages were written on a board put up for student expression.
There was never anything more to this story than some free speech on a free speech board. /2
Instead of reaching this obvious conclusion, the university contacted state and local law enforcement “to identify those responsible for [the] graffiti.”
The investigation identified no suspects and did not result in any disciplinary sanctions. /3
Faculty at @NYUniversity shouldn’t be punished for delivering an education worthy of “a private university in the public service.” /1
In a letter to #NYU protesting the due process-free firing of chemistry professor Maitland Jones, Jr. after students complained his #orgo class was too hard, @thefireorg addresses the implications for students, faculty, and society at large. /2 thefire.org/fire-letter-to…
NYU senior lecturer @MoleListon summed up the “many significant issues” raised by Jones’ case: “student-driven faculty dismissal, demands for grade inflation, the value of organic chemistry in undergraduate pre-health education, and the precarity of contract faculty”... /3
Every year, incoming med students across the country get their white coats and pledge to “First, do no harm.” 🩺
But this year, @umnmedschool appears to have made its incoming class pledge allegiance to a controversial set of ideologies — ones not all students may agree with. /1
The University of Minnesota Medical School’s student-authored Hippocratic Oath contained a variety of sentiments authored by a small committee of just 15 members of the class, including… /2
…a land acknowledgment, a vow to fight “white supremacy” and foster a culture of “anti-racism,” and a promise to “honor all Indigenous ways of healing that have been historically marginalized by Western medicine.” /3
All Penn State student groups have the right to invite speakers to campus and use university resources for expressive events.
(See FIRE’s Model Policy for Allocating Student Fees. TLDR: Universities must allocate them in a viewpoint-neutral manner.) /2 thefire.org/introducing-th…
We encourage students who object to McInnes’ views to use their own #1A rights to peacefully protest, listen to his message and ask tough questions during Q&A, or ignore him.
These are far better alternatives to censorship — which undercuts everyone’s expressive freedoms. /3