Parents, mainly Muslims & Christian & some of no faith objected with legitimate concerns
No dialogue
Bear in mind, in 2019 Anderton Park HT said in an article that the word ‘consult’ (with parents) was inflammatory, so DfE guidelines = 🔥
to activists birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-…
Parents vilified
Media Diplomacy
Democratic system is failing concerned parents say 5’000+ parents
discourse on ‘political Islam’ in the policy circles of
European elites as a manifestation of the further criminalization of Muslimness emanating from deradicalizion programs
This article discusses the emergence of a discourse on ‘political Islam’ in the policy circles of European elites.
It interprets this discourse on one hand as a manifestation of the further criminalization of Muslimness emanating from programs of countering ‘extremism’ &
“This is the background..
You couldn’t have created that Jewish exclusive state without oppressing or expelling the local population
It’s the longest ethnic cleansing operation in the 20th & 21st Century & it’s still ongoing “ #Nakba
He compares the situation in Israel to his experience with the Holocaust. Maté writes, that “as a Jewish youngster growing up in Budapest, an infant survivor of the Nazi genocide, I was for years haunted by a question resounding in my brain with such force that sometimes my head
I was for years haunted by a question resounding in my brain with such force that sometimes my head would spin: ‘How was it possible?
How could the world have let such horrors happen?’
It was a naïve question, that of a child. I know better now: such is reality.”
@jordanbpeterson
How can we learn history, faith & politics on this tour of The Holy Land when Shapiro’s ignorant hatred is such he can’t name all three Abrahamic Faiths?
👇Cradle of Civilisation they want to demolish as you well know
Dangerous Minds’? Deconstructing Counter-Terrorism Discourse, Radicalisation and the ‘Psychological Vulnerability’ of Muslim Children and Young People in Britain
Vicki Coppock and Mark McGovern
Abstract
Current British Government strategies to counter terrorism
Current British Govt strategies to counter terrorism (exemplified in the #Prevent policy & #Channel programme) are based upon a problematic fusion of certain dominant explanatory models of the ‘causes of terrorism’ (specifically, ‘psychological vulnerability’ to ‘radicalisation’)
based upon a problematic fusion of certain dominant explanatory models of the ‘causes of terrorism’ (specifically, ‘psychological vulnerability’ to ‘radicalisation’) with discourses of ‘child protection/safeguarding
Author of the classic Understanding Terror Networks, Sageman has become only more critical of the U.S. govt’s approach to the problem.
He argues that U.S. society has been transformed for the worse by an extreme overreaction to a limited threat—limited, he insists,
by an extreme overreaction to a limited threat—limited, he insists, despite spectacular recent incidents, which he takes fully into account. Indeed, his discussion of just how limited the threat is marks a major contribution to the discussion and debate over the best way to a
just how limited the threat is marks a major contribution to the discussion and debate over the best way to a measured and much more effective response.
They wanted him to pose as a Muslim convert and infiltrate mosques throughout Southern California, home to an estimated half-million Muslims, a diverse set of Islamic worshippers living in shadows of Disneyland in sprawling Orange County.
Monteilh spent the next 18 months secretly recording conversations with unsuspecting Muslims and providing intelligence back to the FBI about scores of men and women whose only apparent transgression was practicing their religion.
The name of the FBI program, Operation Flex, came from Monteilh being a lifelong gym rat. By offering his services as a fitness instructor to Muslim men, the FBI figured, Monteilh could build trust and identify potential security threats.