First, the Luhansk town, Bilohorivka, Russia, controls the northern outskirts of the town, and they are attacking the south. Capturing this town is a priority for Russia. To my knowledge, they've had no success attacking in the past few days.
The other Bilohorivka is also contested. Wagner appears to control the southern half of the town, as I have it marked on the map. While this isn't confirmed, it seems likely true, so I have marked it this way on the map. The map could change if more information comes out.
There is heavy fighting around Yakovlivka. Russia cannot attack the town head-on, so they have been trying to move around its flanks for months. They've yet to make progress, especially compared to the months of fighting.
Although in recent days, they may have moved a little more. I am unsure of the extent, so the map is unchanged.
In Soledar, there is heavy fighting, but I don't see much movement. Only a lot of casualties for both sides. Russia still controls the Knauf Gips factory and a few minor streets to the north of the factory. Note that everything south of the factory is Bakhmutske and not Soledar.
Russia is pushing south from the Knauf Gips factory into Bakhmutske, which isn't a new development. They've been attempting this for weeks. They now claim to have captured control over the bits of Bakhmutske south and east of the T1302 highway. I haven't seen proof.
Russia is attacking Bakhmut from the east and southeast. I have kept the front lines the same since I lack new information on the exact locations of the fighting. The fighting here is very heavy, with many casualties, but it isn't the primary concern for either Ukraine or Wagner.
Russia is attacking the Opytne/Ivanhrad area. Ivanhrad is essentially a street parallel to Opytne and is either partially or fully contested.
Opytne is under heavy assault, and some Russians claim to have rooted Ukraine out of the town, but I have not seen any proof, so I keep it marked as Ukrainian-controlled.
The most alarming parts of the Bakhmut area are Klishchiivka and the towns south. In the past three or so days, Russia has pushed substantially west, and as their infantry moves up, so do their artillery pieces.
As a result, Ukraine's supply roads (or whatever is left of them) are under heavy bombardment. If Russia continues pushing in this direction, they will eventually reach the highway, dramatically weakening Bakhmut.
Zelenopillya, Kurdyumivka, and Ozarianivka are in a similar position as Klishchiivka, although perhaps fairing a bit better at the moment. They are similarly under considerable pressure from infantry attacks and artillery strikes, but they have not lost as much ground.
This area south of Bakhmut is critically important to the city's defense. Russia performs human wave-style attacks on these positions, supported by massive artillery barrages and tanks.
The loss ratio in these attacks is somewhere between1:5 and 1:10. Meaning every lost Ukrainian is 5 to 10 lost Russians, depending on the attack. But Ukraine is also suffering a lot of casualties in these attacks.
Artillery bombardments have long since erased the terrain features, and as a result, there are very long sight lines, and one can see attacks and movements from very far away.
Wagner attacks so many places from so many angles simultaneously that Ukrainian artillery cannot cover it all. And they do so with the size and frequency that they are slowly capturing ground and are getting critically close to essential roadways. The situation is precarious.
That said, the defenses within Bakhmut are strong, and Ukraine is well prepared for urban combat. Wagner knows that any attempted assault on this city would come with very high casualties, which is why they send human wave attacks to reach the highway.
They think the enormous losses in these attacks are less than what they would suffer within the city. Keep that in mind when you hear Russian claims that they are already inside Bakhmut.
Further south of Bakhmut, Russia is still assaulting Ukrainian positions near Mayorsk. Mayorsk is a fortified train station and has been on the front line since 2014.
Russia is attempting to surround Avdiivka; its capture, along with Bakhmut, is a primary goal for Russia.
To the north of Avdiivka, Russia is attacking the tiny town of Vesele. So small it isn't even labeled on the map. The town is under a small hill just over 200 meters tall.
South of Avdiivka, the small town of Opytne is in trouble. The entire village is contested, and Russia could take control of this town in the coming days.
This capture would weaken the defense of Vodyane, which is adjacent to the west, the southern flank of Avdiivka, and the towns immediately north of Opytne and Vodyane, such as Sjeverne and Tonenke. You also wonder about the fate of Zenith to the east (the blue castle icon).
There is still fighting in Vodyane, but I do not have particular news of the town. It is intimately connected to Opytne to the east and Pervomaiske to the west. Both are adjacent and connected to Vodyane.
Russia attempted a breakthrough in Pervomaiske using two tank companies supported by infantry. A tank company is ten tanks, although typically you only use half in an offensive operation, so this attack was likely around ten tanks plus infantry with their BMP/BTR.
Ukraine repulsed this attack, and Pervomaiske remains in Ukrainian control.
South of Pervomaiske, Russia has attempted multiple breakthroughs in Nevelske over the past few days. Russia heavily shells the area with heavy artillery between these offensive actions.
Like the area south of Bakhmut, Russia is using large waves of attacks on Pervomaiske and Nevelske to overwhelm the Ukrainian defenders. Combined with the substantial artillery barrages, they slowly widdle down the defenses and push Ukraine out of their positions.
It is unclear how long Ukraine can withstand these attacks, but they inflict massive casualties on the Russian attackers. Albeit with significant attrition to their forces as well.
Krasnohorivka is south of Nevelske and Pervomaiske, but its fate is linked to theirs. After capturing Nevelske, Russia plans to turn south and attack Krasnohorivka from the north and east. For now, Krasnohorivka is taking light mortar fire and occasionally small arms fire.
South of Krasnohorivka is Marinka, which, like Nevelske, is suffering absolutely enormous artillery barrages followed by large infantry attacks.
Russia claims to be making some moderate progress in the northern part of Marinka. Still, Ukraine firmly controls the west, and Marinka is a mercurial place where minor advances come and go.
South of Marinka, Russia is attacking Novomykhailivka. Their goal is to push through Novomykhailivka and Paraskoviivka to get to Kostyantynivka. From there, they could begin to attack Marinka from the south and west. However, they cannot crack Novomykhailivka.
Southwest of Novomykhailivka, you have Pavlivka and Vuhledar. Russia is expending significant resources attacking Pavlivka, and today they posted a propaganda video as "proof" that they captured the town.
They hoisted a flag in the southeast, one black into the city, where I have placed a flag marker, this area has been contested for about two weeks, and placing a flag here does nothing to show a "capture."
This video did little more than sucker gullible people into believing there could be a capture when the reality is nothing on the ground changed in an embarrassingly transparent attempt to cover up their total failure in Kherson.
So ends my trip around the Donetsk front. It contains the vast majority of the ongoing fighting, the heaviest fighting, and the most casualties (for both sides).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Seeing Russia use BM-35 to attack the front line is funny. These drones were supposed to take out Ukrainian logistics, the way ukrainian drones are destroying Russian logistics, but elon musk snapped his fingers and poof. Without America, Russian "technology" is garbage.
They use these things like molniya now. A mockery of their original purpose.
Whats funny is that Ukraine has taken their own Darts and Blyskavka and turned them into long range logistics hunters while Russia has them tied to the front line to blow up random houses.
Russian telegram channels are going through their old videos editing out war crimes. Things they were once proud to show are being secretly removed. They apparently don’t realize their videos and messages are archived.
Example: here is a video uploaded April 10th, at 1:20 in the video you see of the deadliest terrorist attacks on Ukraine this year (filmed from far away, don't worry about gore or anything)
(i sincerely didn't think it would take telegram 1 metric eternity to download this video)
and here is the edited reupload, removing the terrorist attack
For the past two years, we have discussed how Ukraine is building drones that can hit targets 100 to 150 kilometers away. These drones are being produced in enough numbers to disrupt Russian logistics. During this time, some people doubted this was possible, calling it too optimistic or asking, "Why can't Russians do the same thing?"
To me, the answers were clear. Ukraine has better technology across various forms of communication, either on its own or with allies' help. Starlink is one example, but it is not the only or even the most important one.
Ukraine also has more experience and stronger command-and-control systems for drones. While these systems are not perfect, they are better than what Russia has, especially at the scale needed for this kind of operation.
Ukraine developed many different technologies and weapons in parallel, and for a good deal of time, none of these projects had much, if any, impact on the war itself. So, for a long time, it seemed nothing was happening, and this, along with Russia's media narrative (and the profound willingness of people to fall for Russian propaganda), led many to believe Russia was inevitably winning, which was never true, and is certainly untrue now.
Now, these technologies and weapons have reached the front line at about the same time, within a few weeks or months of each other. Some are better or more specialized than others, and some will be countered or may fail. Still, the fact that they all appeared together makes it very hard for Russia to adapt and stop them.
Ukraine will be able to send very cheap drones with a range of over 100 kilometers into Russia's rear areas. These drones can be guided by many different methods to hit every important target at first, and probably, in time, every target.
Russia has already had to close some roads and routes because of the threat. This is just the start. The danger will only grow as Ukraine increases production over time. These drones are cheap and easy to make, and Ukraine will produce them in large numbers. Russia does not have any technology that can handle this threat right now.
SHORAD can create small protected areas, but if it is used often, it will eventually be destroyed.
Electronic warfare probably will not solve the problem, but it might help a little.
Nets along highways will help, but only slightly. And nets can pose risks and hazards of their own. When they collapse, they can close roads, forcing vehicles through chokepoints that can be mined and attacked.
Interceptor drones can work, but they need a lot of resources that would otherwise go to offensive operations.
The Russian military is dealing with a problem no army has faced before, and there is no clear solution. Their best option is to spread supplies across many vehicles and use every possible road and path to move them forward. However, this is very inefficient and only helps as much as Ukraine's drone production allows.
The "russia will figure it out" crowd should sit down and give me your list of excuses for how Russia still doesn't have heavy bombers after more than 4 years of trying to replicate them.
Russia doesn't have an answer to bombers or their own bomber. They have nothing. And you think they can solve strike drones? Something an order of magnitude harder to develop and harder to stop? On what basis do you think this? It is just cope.
Russians waving flags in Verkhnia Tersa, a lesser known highly pro-Ukrainian town in Zaporizhzhia. I remember reading the news story about the first civilian KIA in this town, and how shocking it was to them, in 2023 I think. Seeing the place like this now is sad.
Here is translated text from Al Ta about the situation in Ukraine. He is a Russian propagandist, a soviet anti-Putinist who views reviving the full Soviet Union (including Poland) as the primary number one goal of this war. He's also pretty honest about the situation. Its long. (racial slurs and whatnot are removed btw)
Preservation of one’s own forces and resources (including manpower).
On paper, everything looks neat and classical: we strike the enemy at its foundations and core, while we ourselves conserve strength and wait for the right moment for a decisive blow. But in reality, everything is both simpler and more complicated at the same time.
If you think through the basic principles of a classical war of attrition, then at the initial stage, when the enemy’s potential is being destroyed, when strikes are delivered against its economy, communications, and supply routes for raw materials and weapons, the side that holds the initiative should remain on the defensive, abandoning unimportant territories and максимально protecting its soldiers. This attrition is carried out through the remote destruction of the enemy’s potential.
Strictly speaking, the correct strategy in such a war should include:
1. Readiness for total and continuous mobilization.
We remember that this kind of war is one of mobilizing all the strength of the people. Total mobilization is necessary to achieve a manpower advantage, which should allow final military actions to be carried out quickly once the enemy’s ability to resist is completely broken. In addition, prolonged combat, even in a well-organized defense, still leads to losses, which are unavoidable. Therefore, there is a constant need to replenish the front with personnel.
2. Readiness for total destruction and the deaths of the enemy’s civilian population (and your own, if the enemy is not weaker than you).
It is extremely difficult, more likely impossible, to “delicately” destroy a country’s economic foundation. Therefore, a country that begins such a war must be prepared to act decisively and harshly. This is the price of survival.
3. Defense as the foundation of the first phase of such a war.
Preserving soldiers’ lives is the key to a future victorious offensive. It is physically impossible to conserve personnel while conducting offensive operations. Many are familiar with the standard ratios required for an attacking force to outnumber a defending one. Even taking into account more advanced and destructive weapons, the need for such a ratio remains, it will never be 1:1. In essence, the main function of troops (infantry supported by tanks, artillery, and aviation) in such a war is to occupy territories where the enemy can no longer resist. Frontal or stubborn assaults are not characteristic of a war of attrition.
4. Seizing territory in the initial and main stages of such a war is not the primary objective.
Territory should be taken either after the course of the war has been turned and the enemy’s ability to resist has been broken, or through the imposition of postwar conditions.
5. Emphasis on firepower.
The enemy should be subjected to an overwhelming barrage of destructive force using every possible means. Everything available should be directed at the target. Naturally, this places emphasis on highly destructive weapons: artillery and aviation. The nature of the current war has also added UAVs (unmanned systems). We already see strike systems in the air and at sea, and soon ground systems will be added.
The goal is to inflict unacceptable losses on the enemy before you yourself suffer unacceptable losses. If you like, it resembles a boxing match: both sides exchange blows, but in the end the stronger one wins. At the same time, for every artillery shot fired at you, ten should be fired in return; for every drone launched, ten drones should respond. Only this way.
Yet, for example, by the results of March 2026, “so-called Ukraine” surpassed us in the number of drones launched at our territory.
Each of you can compare these principles with what is actually happening at the front. After all, “we haven’t even started yet,” if some leaders are to be believed.
I want to start by saying I don’t have access to official documents or meetings, so I’m piecing together their motivations based on what I observe and logical reasoning. Keep that in mind as you read on.
This year, Russia's goals are threefold. First, to capture the eastern bank of the Dnipro River. Second, to capture Kostyantynivka. Third, to capture Slovyansk.
Each of these goals has necessary steps. To capture the bank in Zaporizhzhia, you must first capture Orikhiv. To capture Slovyansk, you must first capture Lyman. You could argue that to capture Kostyantynivka, you must first capture Chasiv Yar.
These goals are very ambitious and, honestly, impossible to fully achieve. So let’s think of them as aspirations and focus instead on how close Russia might get to reaching them.
Ukraine launched several counterattacks in the Verbove and Ternove areas of Zaporizhzhia. They were quite successful, pushing Russia out of several settlements and possibly capturing some. This also threatened Russia’s main supply route to the west. Because of this, Russia has to do two things: divert resources from their main attack to stabilize the area and try to recapture this ground to keep pushing west toward Orikhiv. Meanwhile, Ukraine gains time to strengthen defenses, plan their strategy, and prepare for more counterattacks, something Russia worries about given their timeline.
This has already delayed Russia’s offensive by months, and it will take many more weeks for them to regain their previous position.
Recently, Russia tried an armored assault on Orikhiv, which failed badly (A). They also tried to advance through Mala Tokmachka (B) before, but that failed too. A direct attack on Orikhiv is unlikely to succeed without heavy losses, so Russia wants to avoid it unless they have no choice. Still, based on past experience, they might end up having to take the town this way.