Alexander Stahel 🌻 Profile picture
Nov 12, 2022 21 tweets 12 min read Read on X
TAM mirage + crabbing market share + nerdy talk is how money is destroyed fastest.

What is unacceptable is that quality VCs still fail to DD investments properly while having zero macro process. They deserve to be sued by LPs.

@sequoia @FTX_Official @SBF_FTX
Inside job - not sure why that is even a debate.
Marc Cohodes explains a thing or two
Filings showed that Alameda has more than 100,000 creditors.
First comes the draw down, then comes the sell down

@WifeyAlpha @DrastikThomas
Optimistic, but John Ray seems to see some „assets“ for now…which of course allows him to pay out his salary

@WifeyAlpha @DrastikThomas @kittysquiddy
Why? FTX’s biggest asset as of Thursday was $2.2bn worth of a cryptocurrency called Serum. Serum’s total market value was $88m on Sat, acc to CryptoCompare. Personally I doubt 10cent on $ will be returned to creditors in some years.

@DrastikThomas @WifeyAlpha @kittysquiddy
Bankman-Fried personally seems to own shares in Robinhood.

Some value there to be recovered for FTX creditors in a lengthy court process but by now it’s obvious the guy used FTX funds to finance his personal holdings.

@DrastikThomas
He wanted to sell at a 20% discount - too little too late

@DrastikThomas
Given how young this unregulated space is: (a) assume more „FTX issues“ to come to light soon; (b) expect most retailers wanting to liquidate their coins (if they even can) to buy safe $ bills 💵 (oh the irony); which (c) pushes all coins (much) lower in coming weeks.

#Bitcoin
Lesson 1:

If an exchange goes bust, its users’ „digital assets“ (funny name I know) will go into the bankruptcy estate that lawyers & advisors divvy up: Creditor rankings for payouts means „customers“ come last. Watch & learn with laser eyes…!

wsj.com/articles/a-cry…
Lesson 2:

The only thing that matters for any asset when trust vanishes is liquidity. For an exchange however, it always was the only thing that mattered. An exchange going bust & lawyers taking over for years is the mother of “self-feeding” coin value destructions.

#Bitcoin
Lesson 3:

In a bankruptcy process, the administrator is by definition a destress seller which makes it hard to recover fair value even for the best trophy assets.

Now take a look at the asset & liability table of FTX…

@DrastikThomas
d1e00ek4ebabms.cloudfront.net/production/7ab…
First, imagine being the administrator and receiving an excel scribble like this for an Enron-like size filing!

Let’s look at the liability side first:
USD 5.1bn in debt (likely in form of client deposits or 3rd party lending) is a pretty good starting point.

#FTXbankruptcy
The list divided assets into liquid, less liquid & illiquid.

SRM (Serum) is the largest single asset at $2.2bn valued. We don’t have ownership no but SRM is distressed (-27% as I write this) with a total market cap of $67m for 100% of tokens. Assume nil value!

@DrastikThomas
Next: Solana (SOL).

Again, we don’t know how many Alameda owned but at least there seems a $5bn market cap left, although that is falling quickly…I suspect some value is recoverable here but never the quoted $900m. Perhaps $50-100m ?
Next: FTT was FTX/Alameda’s own token: a zero buy definition - not $550m - although the market hasn’t fully priced that yet (market cap still $230m for 100% tokens).

@DrastikThomas
And MAPS, quoted at $616m value? Well, the whole token cap is $3m while the coin is -28% as we write this.

Prima vista #FTX is a likely write off for 100,000 depositors (creditors) after studying the 4 largest positions as stated by mgmt.

@DrastikThomas @BobgonzaleBob

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alexander Stahel 🌻

Alexander Stahel 🌻 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BurggrabenH

Apr 3
On this platform, certain perma bulls keep pushing a bullish crude narrative based on relative U.S. inventories—day after day, for three years now.

Their logic: Total U.S. crude inventories (including the SPR) are at 838 million barrels (orange line), 200 million barrels below the 10-year average → bullish!

Yet, inventories keep falling, and prices remain stuck in a range. Clearly, they are wrong.

1/9 @UrbanKaoboy @Iris62655179 @BrentRuditLeoImage
The problem with their logic?

a) The U.S. is no longer the marginal importer of crude oil—Asia is (or was).

b) U.S. inventories are artificially high on a 10-year average due to the shale boom, which took off in 2014. Shale growth and Covid distort the data, keeping inventories (ex SPR) elevated. So any 5- or 10-year comparison is meaningless—period.

2/n US Crude Oil Inventory ex SPRImage
Including SPRs, the picture looks more normalised - but not tight. But does the US really need 700mb of strategic reserves in 2025? I don't think so.

3/n US Crude Inv incl SPRs Image
Read 9 tweets
Mar 23
Yesterday, I shared a few thoughts that I’d like to expand on, especially given how volatile the current tariff landscape under this admin has become.

Navigating it isn’t just difficult—it’s nearly impossible to avoid missteps. Hopefully some traders will expand on my thoughts...

1/n
What do we know?

As at 23 March 2025, Comex copper price in New York is trading at 14% premium to LME in London. Buying a tonne of copper in NY costs $11,213 versus 9,842 in London, $1,371 per tonne more than in London.

2/n Image
Why is that? Because of tariff FEARS, not tariffs.

Traders are hedging future risk of potential tariffs on all forms of the raw material, such as cathodes, concentrates, ores, and even scrap. But there aren't such tariffs in place for copper yet (unlike alumnium).

3/n
fastmarkets.com/insights/us-ta…
Read 9 tweets
Mar 22
A few thoughts on copper.

The current Comex price action in the U.S. is basically a Trump tariff trade mirage and is otherwise as misleading of fundaments as the May 2024 price action of which I warned on multiple occasions.

1/n $/pound Image
In May 2024 however, U.S. price action was more in synch with London. But it didn't reflect weak Chinese housing & construction fundamentals which has been 15-30% of GLOBAL copper use for the past two decades. Today, U.S. prices trade as if borders close tomorrow.

2/n Comex - LME arb in $/tImage
Unlike May 2024, copper blue chips like $FCX, however, do not buy the rally. So at least it seems that the equity market understands the tariff aspect of the copper price mirage.

3/n Change in % Image
Read 15 tweets
Nov 3, 2024
Let's talk China: Episode 5 of 7

In this episode, we discuss China's 2nd of 5 economic paths it can follow.

This episode will also focus on Xi the leader. To understand Xi means to better understand China's economic path forward.

1/n #China Image
Can China replace malinvestment with more consumption?

Answer: Maybe a little bit & over a long time frame, but President Xi does not want to focus on this path. Instead, he wants to implement his socialist utopia.

2/n Image
Yes, China’s rising entrepreneurs were welcomed by the Communist Party for at least two decades. But all of that is in reverse.

Under Xi Jinping, China has moved full circle: from low growth & low freedom in the pre-reform era back towards something similar today.

3/n Image
Read 7 tweets
Oct 29, 2024
Let's talk China, shall we? Episode 4 of 7

In this episode, we discuss China's investment-led growth model & the first of 5 economic paths China can follow.

As you would expect, also this episode is full of Chinese characteristics!

1/n #China Image
Starting in 1990s, China’s economic engine has been fueled by capital investments.

Its central planning bureau defined GDP targets, picked winners and drove growth from debt-driven capital formations (green line).

2/n Image
Has any other nation tried this before, ever? Not to our knowledge.

We checked at ALL G20 economies and their respective growth models for past 70 years. 45% capital formation share is a unique experiment in economic history.

3/n Image
Read 6 tweets
Oct 20, 2024
Let's talk China, shall we?

Over the past 3 years, we made some controversial calls in commodities. We decided to exit our oil holding in Aug 2022, we went short natgas in early 2023 or called for copper to go lower in May.

Why? Because we have an egde on China.

1/n #China Image
Yes, mainstream media picked up pace on important issues facing China today.

Most came to understand that the property bubble burst, that the economy is slowing, that geopolitical frictions are emerging, that there is too much debt.

But do they understand the underlying forces that drive these issues?

2/n
While the majority of these facts are known, most Western observers, investors & industrialists do not fully appreciate their interdependence & the structural changes that are unfolding in China today.

For too long, the CCP had their back.

3/n
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(