Out of curiosity, I decided to take a look at how some of the long shot Senate races which there had been some minor buzz about ended up going.
In Missouri, there was hope that a beer fortune heiress billionaire might be competitive. She wasn't.
In Indiana, there were a couple of polls showing Tom McDermott might be competitive. He wasn't.
(again, this isn't a reflection on the candidates themselves, just about the state they ran in).
In Louisiana, there was some controversy on the Democratic side about whether to back a "safer" moderate candidate (Mixon) or one more to the left on issues (Chambers). It didn't matter--Kennedy ended up getting nearly twice as many votes as both of them *combined*.
In Oklahoma, *both* GOP Senate seats were up this year, with two women w/the same last name (no relation) running as Democrats. There was some buzz that Kendra Horn, at least, might pull off a massive upset. Didn't happen. :(
And finally, in Utah, Democrats decided to take a gamble on Evan McMullin to see if combining forces with independents & #NeverTrumpers might be a way to win in a deep red state. Sadly, it didn't work.
I'm not being snarky here--I raised money for all of these candidates (except for LA, where I just raised money for the state Democratic party instead), and I'm disappointed none of them managed to pull it off. I give huge props to Dems who stick their necks out in red states.
Oh yeah...there were also 2 long shot Governors races where the Dem candidate was either leading or competitive in several polls towards the end of the election cycle, in Oklahoma and South Dakota. Neither one ended up even close, I'm afraid :(
And finally, there's this year's "Amy McGrath" case study: Georgia's 14th House district, where Dems poured something like $15 million into a race where MTG ended up still crushing him nearly 2:1.
Again, not belittling Flowers for running *or* Dems for donating a few bucks to him--after all, Adam Fritsch *may* still end up pulling off a win against Boebert in CO-03. But there are limits, & there's a difference between an R+7 district (Boebert) & an R+22 district (MTG).
I almost forgot Iowa, which *I* was really hoping would be a sleeper upset. Franken had a mini-surge...which then faded out again at the end. Sigh.
As for my own fundraising, here's how it broke out for the Senate races. Notice how I didn't ignore *any* of the the long shot states but I did get more realistic towards the end of the campaign cycle.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
With early voting starting in just 65 days in a few states, David asked this very reasonable question. I'm not an expert, but my general understanding of the situation is this: 1/
There've been a number of polls claiming that Harris/etc. would perform a few points better...but that's all THEORETICAL.
We all know that the moment it became a reality the numbers could change dramatically...especially given all the other chaos which would surround it. 2/
The thinking seems to be that Harris has a higher ceiling but also a lower floor. If you're 100% certain that Biden can't win, it therefore makes sense to figure you have nothing to lose.
However, this would upset millions of Dems who voted for Biden in the primary... 3/
Thread. ~20 years ago, one of the minor controversies surrounding then-President George W. Bush was after being warned that something he wanted to do was unconstitutional, he allegedly angrily replied that the Constitution is "just a damned piece of paper!" 1/
I don't know whether this actually happened or not, but regardless of how appalling it my is, on the most basic level that's actually *correct*: The Constitution *in and of itself* *is* "just a damned peice of paper." It's not a talisman. It doesn't have any magical powers. 2/
The power of The Constitution is in the hands of whoever the American People happen to be at any particular point in time.
If those in charge *and* enough of those who aren't either actively want to ignore the Constitution or just don't care enough to defend it, guess what? 3/
🧵 I just had a lengthy conversation with someone who wanted some insight as to how I've been so successful with my Democratic fundraising project over the past few cycles.
(obviously it wasn't called that in 2020 or 2022) 1/Blue24.org
For those unaware, I've raised nearly $8 MILLION *directly* for hundreds of Democratic candidates since 2019. And I've done it *without* a mailing list or texting anyone. I've done it without a PAC or a staff.
It's all been done purely online via social media. 2/
The reason I started "formally" raising money for Democrats online (as opposed to just occasionally retweeting some candidates ActBlue link now & then) is because I kept seeing Dems griping that they didn't trust how the DCCC/DSCC was allocating funds, etc. 3/
I said it's our only *chance* of doing so. It would also require, within the next 4 years, either:
1. Both Alito & Thomas retire (hah) or pass away.
Or...
2. Congress passes legislation to either expand or otherwise modify SCOTUS.
Even THEN, the damage done by the SCOTUS majority (half of which appointed by Trump) *until* either of those things happens would still take YEARS or DECADES to repair.
And some of it can never be repaired.
...all because some of you refused to vote for Hillary in 2016.
As someone pushing HARD for folks to donate to Democrats up & down the ballot, I’d like to note something about the AIPAC money brouhaha re NY-16.
Yes, money CAN make a significant difference in a race, but only up to a point. After that there’s diminishing returns. 1/
My guess is the first few million dollars AIPAC spent on the NY-16 race probably helped Latimer by a point or two. After that, however, it probably didn’t make much difference at all & may have even hurt him a bit due to residents getting sick of the constant ads/mailers etc. 2/
As a different example, in 2020, the poster child for throwing money down the drain was Amy McGrath for Senate in KY. She raised an insane $90 million & lost by 20 points. Even more insane is she probably would have lost by about the same margin if she’d spent 1/10th as much. 3/