Out of curiosity, I decided to take a look at how some of the long shot Senate races which there had been some minor buzz about ended up going.
In Missouri, there was hope that a beer fortune heiress billionaire might be competitive. She wasn't.
In Indiana, there were a couple of polls showing Tom McDermott might be competitive. He wasn't.
(again, this isn't a reflection on the candidates themselves, just about the state they ran in).
In Louisiana, there was some controversy on the Democratic side about whether to back a "safer" moderate candidate (Mixon) or one more to the left on issues (Chambers). It didn't matter--Kennedy ended up getting nearly twice as many votes as both of them *combined*.
In Oklahoma, *both* GOP Senate seats were up this year, with two women w/the same last name (no relation) running as Democrats. There was some buzz that Kendra Horn, at least, might pull off a massive upset. Didn't happen. :(
And finally, in Utah, Democrats decided to take a gamble on Evan McMullin to see if combining forces with independents & #NeverTrumpers might be a way to win in a deep red state. Sadly, it didn't work.
I'm not being snarky here--I raised money for all of these candidates (except for LA, where I just raised money for the state Democratic party instead), and I'm disappointed none of them managed to pull it off. I give huge props to Dems who stick their necks out in red states.
Oh yeah...there were also 2 long shot Governors races where the Dem candidate was either leading or competitive in several polls towards the end of the election cycle, in Oklahoma and South Dakota. Neither one ended up even close, I'm afraid :(
And finally, there's this year's "Amy McGrath" case study: Georgia's 14th House district, where Dems poured something like $15 million into a race where MTG ended up still crushing him nearly 2:1.
Again, not belittling Flowers for running *or* Dems for donating a few bucks to him--after all, Adam Fritsch *may* still end up pulling off a win against Boebert in CO-03. But there are limits, & there's a difference between an R+7 district (Boebert) & an R+22 district (MTG).
I almost forgot Iowa, which *I* was really hoping would be a sleeper upset. Franken had a mini-surge...which then faded out again at the end. Sigh.
As for my own fundraising, here's how it broke out for the Senate races. Notice how I didn't ignore *any* of the the long shot states but I did get more realistic towards the end of the campaign cycle.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's an updated version of my "Dem Stop the Steal!" conspiracy theory thread which hopefully is less scattershot.
There's 3 main claims:
1. "How could there be 20M fewer voters than in 2020 w/"record-breaking turnout?"
2. "How could 15M fewer voter for Harris vs. Biden?"
3. "How could so many swing state voters vote for the Dem for Senate but not for Harris for POTUS?"
There's a few others, but these are the biggest ones, so let's tackle them first:
1. There weren't 20M fewer voters.
I've been compiling the data as it's being updated by CNN's tracking center via a Google spreadsheet. As of this writing, total POTUS turnout is ~147.6M, or ~10.8M lower than 2020's 158.4M.
Yesterday I posted a thread digging into the actual data behind the "20M missing votes!" and "15M fewer than Biden!" conspiracy theories being tossed around the past few days.
Via CNN, as of this writing, total 2024 POTUS votes are only down 13.9 million vs. 2020...with a likely 11.5 - 12.0 million ballots still to be counted across 30 states.
Total 2024 turnout will likely be ~156M or so...just a couple million fewer than 2020.
Again, using CNN's data & estimates, once every legitimate ballot has been counted, Trump will likely have around ~78 million votes to Harris' 75-76 million.
That'd mean he added ~4 million vs 2020 while she lost ~5-6 million.
...the vast majority of this discrepancy happened in districts/counties which were heavily red to begin with, which is why the MAGA COVID Death Cult factor only ended up making a decisive difference in exactly one statewide race: Arizona Attorney General: acasignups.net/22/12/29/updat…
At the House district level it didn't make a decisive difference in any races at all. To understand why, let's look at two extreme examples...
People have started asking why I'm still pushing fundraising for Dems just 5 days before Election Day. All the ad time has been purchased & the lit pieces printed & mailed out already, right?
There's several reasons: 1/
1. For state legislative races in particular, a last-minute cash infusion of even $50 can mean an extra few pizzas for tired & hungry canvassers or an extra burner phone for phone banking.
2. After the polls close, there's going to no doubt be some races which require recounts...which may or may not have to be paid for by the campaign requesting it, depending on the state and the margin. That's gonna cost money.
🧵THE DEAD POOL: Since @MikeJohnson and @JDVance are promising to Concentrate folks w/pre-existing conditions into separate Camps, let's talk about that. 1/ acasignups.net/24/10/04/dead-…
Let's go back to the pre-ACA healthcare landscape. This is what it looked like in 2012...*before* the ACA's major provisions went into effect.
Half the US had employer coverage. Another third had Medicare or Medicaid. ~11M had "individual" insurance; ~48M had nothing at all. 2/
The ACA had 2 main goals:
1. Reduce the number of uninsured Americans as much as possible by making coverage more affordable & accessible;
2. Provide protections from insurance industry abuses, *especially* for the individual market where the abuses were the most blatant. 3/