False and defamatory claims about the AEA DeAngelo investigation are being circulated online by anonymous accounts.
If our institutions aren’t going to protect us, we have to protect ourselves. Time to set the record straight.
There was a Title IX complaint filed at CGU before the AEA complaint. This is the AEA investigative report’s summary of that Title IX complaint:
Although the AEA investigation was not as thorough as I had hoped, it is not true that it found “no victims, no witnesses.” Here are 3 findings from the AEA investigative report:
I'm planning to be completely offline this weekend so please get your #EconMeToo allegations in by Friday. 🙃
More seriously, I've spent the past few days basically running a giant switchboard, putting victims & witnesses in touch with interested reporters. If you have a story to share, no need to tell me any details, just email/DM me asking for the journalists' contact info.
No need to go on the record at this point. The goal is to starting building external pressure that will force our institutions to make meaningful changes for the better.
Another problem w the AEA process (in addition to those in this thread): It makes clear to all parties that the final report from the investigation is confidential and should not be shared, to protect the accused. This sounds reasonable in theory but is harmful in practice. /1
It sets us up so that the perpetrator can selectively quote from the report in their defense, while those on the complainant/victim side feel we risk sanctions if we share the full report or highlight other, more incriminating sections. /2
This is to say: If you're seeing selective quotes from a perpetrator or his supporters, please consider the possibility that you are not getting the full story, as the other side is limited in what it can share. /3
@APeichl@VfS_econ I greatly appreciate that you’re taking this seriously but want to offer a word of caution based on experience w an AEA investigation. This lack of investigative power is a real constraint. /1
@APeichl@VfS_econ The AEA similarly has no power to subpoena information, etc, and so their year-long investigation into a serial predator turned up little - not bc there was little to be found (more soon!) but bc they couldn’t compel the release of documents. /2
@APeichl@VfS_econ The AEA also does not protect the confidentiality of victims/witnesses who come forward - not sure if that is a choice or legal constraint as well but obviously it means people w info do not share it. /3
Recent allegations of sexual harassment and worse against Armin Falk & Philip Dybvig are super troubling, not least because the economics profession & academia more broadly have demonstrated *zero* ability to hold people accountable for such behavior.
What gives me hope is that women are not tolerating this bullshit anymore. Social media + the press are our friends, in a world where our employers & professional associations keep letting us down. More on this soon. 🔥
I'll add 1 more name to this list, bc I literally cannot stand having this info anymore. I've heard several credible allegations against GMU's Dan Houser—that he gropes women PhD students at conferences. Apparently this is an open secret; if you have more info, please speak up!